A reflection on Horcruces and Dumbledore
Feb. 3rd, 2011 11:49 amI've argued before that Dumbledore knew from the start that Harry had become Tom's Horcrux.
But, if he were as smart as he thought he were, he should have realized that that fact alone proved that Riddle had others (or some other means of avoiding death when his body was destroyed, and Horcruces do seem to be the only known means).
He deduced that Riddle had planned to manufacture a Horcrux from the baby's death, right? Not either of the parents' deaths.
Therefore, the death that created the soul-fragment that landed in Harry, was Riddle's own from that reflected AK.
If he hadn't already been anchored to life by another Horcrux somewhere, he should have merely died.
So Dumbledore ought to have started looking for another Horcrux in 1981....
But, if he were as smart as he thought he were, he should have realized that that fact alone proved that Riddle had others (or some other means of avoiding death when his body was destroyed, and Horcruces do seem to be the only known means).
He deduced that Riddle had planned to manufacture a Horcrux from the baby's death, right? Not either of the parents' deaths.
Therefore, the death that created the soul-fragment that landed in Harry, was Riddle's own from that reflected AK.
If he hadn't already been anchored to life by another Horcrux somewhere, he should have merely died.
So Dumbledore ought to have started looking for another Horcrux in 1981....
no subject
Date: 2011-02-04 08:42 pm (UTC)Wouldn't that tend to indicate that if you make a lot of horcruxes, you're bound to create another whenever you "die"? Or that you're highly likely to?
If so, Harry didn't kill (or may not have killed) Voldemort after all.
Furthermore, once you create n horcruxes, you're safe from death even if all n horcruxes are destroyed, because you'll just create a new one when you "die." At least until you, um, run out of soul. (Gah, I hate the way these books treat soul as a physical thing.)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-04 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-04 11:26 pm (UTC)Now that I think of it, creating n horcruxes wouldn't make you entirely safe from death. If someone destroyed your death-throes-horcrux while you were disembodied, presumably you'd just die.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-05 01:28 am (UTC)That's an interesting point - before Horcruces were added, I assumed Vapourmort was similar to a ghost. Does the disembodied spirit of a Horcrux-user need the Horcrux once its body has actually died, or does it merely need something to anchor it during the process of dying? (Maybe Vapourmort was more like a ghost than I thought and is in fact a mere echo of the original Voldemort, with Horcruces merely anchoring a ghost rather than the original soul, giving another possible reason for the mental deterioration).
no subject
Date: 2011-02-05 05:52 pm (UTC)Or perhaps suicide while having a Horcrux (as opposed to just 'dying' while having a Horcrux).