oryx_leucoryx (
oryx_leucoryx) wrote in
deathtocapslock2011-03-12 09:56 am
Entry tags:
GOF Chapter 11: Aboard the Hogwarts Express
Amos Diggory's head in the fireplace is talking to Molly and Arthur. This is Harry's first encounter with floo-calling.
Amos wants Arthur to 'smooth things over' to prevent Rita from finding about the curious incident of the dustbins in the night-time. Because Moody ( a recently retired Auror, if we believe Harry in DH thinking he personally trained Tonks) has a history of attacking things (and people, I suppose) for no reason. Later this book Sirius will describe him as one who did not kill suspects if he could avoid it, as if he were one of the saner in the bunch. So it seems his paranoia is a form of PTSD, developed after the war was over.
Of course we know the incident is the subdue of Moody by two dead men - Barty Jr and Peter. Had Amos and Arthur let the Improper Use of magic folks take care of things properly Voldemort's plot might have been halted in its tracks very early on. Voldemort will thank Arthur for his assistance in his resurrection by having Nagini bite him next year. Was Voldemort *counting* on Moody's friends rushing to get him out of trouble? And had it really been a case of Moody hexing Muggles in a bout of paranoia, would he have ended up in Azkaban, next to the DEs he arrested 13 years earlier?
So far Arthur's little ring of corruption includes himself, head of a minor office in the Department of Magical Law Enforcement, Amos in the Department for the Regulation and Control of Magical Creatures, Ludo Bagman in the Department of Magical Games and Sports, an unnamed contact in the Department of Magical Transportation and Alastor Moody, retired Auror. Four out of seven departments. Maybe his big disappointment with Percy was because his son wasn't willing to be his corrupt contact in International Cooperation.
Bill and Charlie share their parents' high opinion of Moody. Fred and George do not, nor do they have a particularly high opinion of their father, or even of Dumbledore's judgment (but somehow this doesn't make them evil).
Meanwhile the Voldie-Imperiurized Crouch is beginning to rely more on Percy. Not that any of his siblings care that he has to be at work rather than see them off to the train.
Sorry Molly, none of your husband's contacts was able to arrange transportation this year. You'll have to manage with taxis. (Why not use the Knight Bus? Because scaring Muggles with owls, fireworks and a clawing cat is more fun, I suppose.)
Charlie and Bill hint about an upcoming event at Hogwarts. Does Bill know he'll be coming to watch the opening of a maze for an hour or so? Molly joins the hinting - nobody will want to come home for Christmas! (Not even Ginny, who is too young to attend the Ball on her own.)
Is this really the first time the possibility that Draco would have attended Durmstrang comes up in a conversation with his friends? Because they are talking about the upcoming Tournament? Durmstrang doesn't take Muggle-borns and actively teaches the Dark Arts. This establishes the school as evil and everyone attending it as DE-equivalent. (Except in DH we learned that Durmstrang alumnus Viktor Krum was from a family that opposed Grindelwald.)
So Hermione read about Durmstrang and knows about the school's uniforms and curriculum, though not its (secret!) location nor the questionable history of its headmaster. I wonder if the school's 'horrible reputation' is because the book was written by a British wizard? Or a Dumbles supporter? How many British wizards are aware of said reputation? Or of the traditional rivalry between the schools? Ron certainly isn't. Oh, he heard of that school somewhere. Like, perhaps in an interview with his Quidditch hero? But he didn't realize Viktor was still a student. Ack! If wizards from different parts of a continent barely interact how can there be traditional rivalry between them? Or their schools? Maybe only the teachers are involved in the 'rivalry' anyway.
Yes, shame that Narcissa loves her son, indeed. In a few years Harry will be thankful to her for that. Or should be. (Is Ron evil for fantasizing about killing Draco the way Draco is evil for wishing the Heir of Slytherin would kill Hermione? Or is it IOIAGDI?)
Hermione is already learning the summoning charm because in 3 months time Harry will need her help with it.
To an innocent observer Draco may appear to be making friendly banter, but Harry and Ron take everything he says as a declaration of war. Until Draco catches that Arthur did not tell Ron about the coming year's events. Then Draco capitalizes on Ron's insecurity and sense of inferiority over his dad and his position at the Ministry. The entire scene comes across as being more about Harry and Ron's defensiveness than about Draco's verbal 'attack'.
Amos wants Arthur to 'smooth things over' to prevent Rita from finding about the curious incident of the dustbins in the night-time. Because Moody ( a recently retired Auror, if we believe Harry in DH thinking he personally trained Tonks) has a history of attacking things (and people, I suppose) for no reason. Later this book Sirius will describe him as one who did not kill suspects if he could avoid it, as if he were one of the saner in the bunch. So it seems his paranoia is a form of PTSD, developed after the war was over.
Of course we know the incident is the subdue of Moody by two dead men - Barty Jr and Peter. Had Amos and Arthur let the Improper Use of magic folks take care of things properly Voldemort's plot might have been halted in its tracks very early on. Voldemort will thank Arthur for his assistance in his resurrection by having Nagini bite him next year. Was Voldemort *counting* on Moody's friends rushing to get him out of trouble? And had it really been a case of Moody hexing Muggles in a bout of paranoia, would he have ended up in Azkaban, next to the DEs he arrested 13 years earlier?
So far Arthur's little ring of corruption includes himself, head of a minor office in the Department of Magical Law Enforcement, Amos in the Department for the Regulation and Control of Magical Creatures, Ludo Bagman in the Department of Magical Games and Sports, an unnamed contact in the Department of Magical Transportation and Alastor Moody, retired Auror. Four out of seven departments. Maybe his big disappointment with Percy was because his son wasn't willing to be his corrupt contact in International Cooperation.
Bill and Charlie share their parents' high opinion of Moody. Fred and George do not, nor do they have a particularly high opinion of their father, or even of Dumbledore's judgment (but somehow this doesn't make them evil).
Meanwhile the Voldie-Imperiurized Crouch is beginning to rely more on Percy. Not that any of his siblings care that he has to be at work rather than see them off to the train.
Sorry Molly, none of your husband's contacts was able to arrange transportation this year. You'll have to manage with taxis. (Why not use the Knight Bus? Because scaring Muggles with owls, fireworks and a clawing cat is more fun, I suppose.)
Charlie and Bill hint about an upcoming event at Hogwarts. Does Bill know he'll be coming to watch the opening of a maze for an hour or so? Molly joins the hinting - nobody will want to come home for Christmas! (Not even Ginny, who is too young to attend the Ball on her own.)
Is this really the first time the possibility that Draco would have attended Durmstrang comes up in a conversation with his friends? Because they are talking about the upcoming Tournament? Durmstrang doesn't take Muggle-borns and actively teaches the Dark Arts. This establishes the school as evil and everyone attending it as DE-equivalent. (Except in DH we learned that Durmstrang alumnus Viktor Krum was from a family that opposed Grindelwald.)
So Hermione read about Durmstrang and knows about the school's uniforms and curriculum, though not its (secret!) location nor the questionable history of its headmaster. I wonder if the school's 'horrible reputation' is because the book was written by a British wizard? Or a Dumbles supporter? How many British wizards are aware of said reputation? Or of the traditional rivalry between the schools? Ron certainly isn't. Oh, he heard of that school somewhere. Like, perhaps in an interview with his Quidditch hero? But he didn't realize Viktor was still a student. Ack! If wizards from different parts of a continent barely interact how can there be traditional rivalry between them? Or their schools? Maybe only the teachers are involved in the 'rivalry' anyway.
Yes, shame that Narcissa loves her son, indeed. In a few years Harry will be thankful to her for that. Or should be. (Is Ron evil for fantasizing about killing Draco the way Draco is evil for wishing the Heir of Slytherin would kill Hermione? Or is it IOIAGDI?)
Hermione is already learning the summoning charm because in 3 months time Harry will need her help with it.
To an innocent observer Draco may appear to be making friendly banter, but Harry and Ron take everything he says as a declaration of war. Until Draco catches that Arthur did not tell Ron about the coming year's events. Then Draco capitalizes on Ron's insecurity and sense of inferiority over his dad and his position at the Ministry. The entire scene comes across as being more about Harry and Ron's defensiveness than about Draco's verbal 'attack'.
no subject
It seems plausible to me that Hermione simply read that Durmstrang is well-known for teaching the Dark Arts, not just Defense Against them, and concluded (probably without thinking) that that translates to having "a horrible reputation."
...Actually, the juxtaposition of her own words suggests that that's it:
"Yes," said Hermione sniffily, "and it's got a horrible reputation. According to An Appraisal of Magical Education in Europe, it puts a lot of emphasis on the Dark Arts."
Maybe the "traditional rivalry" goes back to when the Tri-Wizard Tournament was a regular thing. It's just a really *old* tradition.
no subject
no subject
I do! It's hard to miss, really. Not only they are offensively stereotyped in every single case, they are also always portrayed as something less than British wizards, ridiculed at every opportunity and when there is any kind of rivalry between them and the British, the foreigners are always sure to lose. IMO this is one of the most annoying features of the “great plea for tolerance” that is Harry Potter.
no subject
no subject
Which keeps me thinking - but they are speaking a foreign language and communicating themselves rather OK! Just imagine Harry and his friends had to travel to one of the other schools - they'd either be total idiots or demand that their hosts accommodate them by speaking English all the time. Except for Hermione, who would be using a phrase book.
no subject
Victor is a "Bulgarian Bruiser", Fleur is a "French Fairy Princess", all important French characters are female love interests (in the movie all Beauxbatons students are female. And their introduction scene is pure WTF?) and all Durmstrang's students are presented as the stereotypical Eastern European "big, strong dolts". (Heck, the movie is even worse. In it they are hybrid young Communists / circus troupe.)
no subject
And considering that the author used to teach English to foreigners, it is an aspect of the stories that makes one go, "Hmmmmm...."
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
JKR's foreign students
(no subject)
Boarding school genre
The series started out as a revival of the boarding school genre, but in Goblet of Fire it first begins its gradual deterioration into sub par fantasy.
Re: Boarding school genre
Like Salazar Slytherin. Slytherin sounds like it has Anglo-Saxon roots (he's just a slithery dude), but Salazar is originally a Basque name. He probably had recent ancestors from northern Spain. And JKR did say she named him after the Portuguese dictator...
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
Re: Boarding school genre
no subject
Although, one of the Death Eaters (I can't remember his name - was it Rowle?) seems to be xenophobic, as shown by the scene where he hesitates to take Ron's hand in DH when Ron is disguised as a foreign wizard. And while Durmstrang is portrayed as being a shady school, Beauxbatons is not. So, I don't think that there was meant to be an anti-foreigner theme. I think that JKR just chose to stick to stereotypes, that's all.
no subject
Don't forget Gellert Grindelwald. According to an interview with JKR, he caused Dumbledore to temporarily "lose his moral compass."
Don't you have to have a moral compass to loose one? JKR can say what she wants but it's quite possible that Albus the teenager didn't really have a moral compass, or more like not one developed enough to be an actual moral compass. Maybe it was just the arrow (ha)
Someone with a moral compass would know that talking over and enslaving muggles is wrong no matter how pretty the words are spun to make it sound like a good idea. If DD had a moral compass he would have told Gellard straight away he wasn't into the idea of world domination.
Dumbledore only gained the idea that Gellard was bad when his sister got killed. Not unlike the wakeup call Severus got when Voldie wanted to hunt down Lily.
Both were young and stupid. Dumbledore apparently was blinded by teenage lust if he really was in love with Gellert. Technically we only have a interview saying Dumbledore was gay, there is nothing in canon that really says that one way or the other.
Maybe it's an easy out for JKR. Making Dumbledore gay outside of canon is a good excuse to use for Dumbledore inside canon. He was in love and stupid. No, he really didn't believe what Gellard was selling, he just wanted some hot Gellard action. The Dumbledore is gay almost makes a 'better' excuse for young Dumbledore doesn't it? In story there is nothing there, outside in an interview, JKR gives him a love/sex reason to loose his 'moral compass'. My question has to be did he really have one at 16/17/18 years old?
You can take the love/infatuation aspect out of it and think thats it's a pretty screwed up thing to do for someone who supposedly has a moral compass. Gellard looks like a used car salesman trying to sell a crappy car, and Dumbledore buys it.
The idea JKR sets up for quite a few of her characters is, they have this reversal of their ideals.
James Potter apparently had some sort of moral compass adjustment. Though we all have to question that since Sirius/Lupin says that Snape was still a special case even after the supposed moral compass ajustment.
Dumbledore has this moral compass adjustment when his sister dies.
Draco malfoy seems to have a moral compass ajustment by the end of the series, as well as his mother and father. Because if it wasn't for Narcissa' choice to lie, the last book might have ended very differently.
Severus Snape also had a moral ajustment when Lily was being hunted by Voldie.
So, it seems like quite a few characters apparently go and get a compass.
But I think it's quite possible that like all the other characters Dumbledore's 'moral compass' was questionable; hell I still question if it exists right now on certain issues in canon.
I don't think Gellard made him loose it, maybe it should be more like Gellard made Dumbledore find it. To me someone with a moral compass doesn't loose it, they choose to ignore it maybe but then thats not really loosing it, thats something else.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Severus in the DTCL
Re: Severus in the DTCL
Re: Severus in the DTCL
Re: Severus in the DTCL
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If Moody is one of the saner Aurors I'm afraid to think how crazy the others are.
Was Voldemort *counting* on Moody's friends rushing to get him out of trouble?
He probably did. For all the talk about fighting corruption and fairness the "good guys" are quick to do whatever suits them.
And had it really been a case of Moody hexing Muggles in a bout of paranoia, would he have ended up in Azkaban, next to the DEs he arrested 13 years earlier?
Nah, DD needed him to teach. No way would he allow him to end up in Azkaban for something as unimportant as hexing a few Muggles. /sarcasm
Fred and George do not, nor do they have a particularly high opinion of their father, or even of Dumbledore's judgment (but somehow this doesn't make them evil).
Fred and George are bullies who annoy me, but I give them points for not worshiping DD. The rest of the "good" characters think he is infallible and pretty much divine. :(
Charlie and Bill hint about an upcoming event at Hogwarts. Does Bill know he'll be coming to watch the opening of a maze for an hour or so? Molly joins the hinting - nobody will want to come home for Christmas!
That part always bugged me. Torturing the younger siblings with hints of "I know something you don't" it's traditional but most older brothers would actually tell all in the end.
Hinting and then letting the younger kids stew for days is not done.
Granted Charlie and Bill probably waited to start hinting until Fred and George where safely on the train.
If the hinted before they would have had to be careful with what they eat and ready to dodge hexes.
no subject
I was just surprised the text lets them get away with it.
no subject
no subject
Really? They will forego seeing their parents and spend weeks at school for the sake of a few hours at a ball? Why can't they go home and then come back for the ball? Or hold the ball at a more sensible time?
no subject
Why, in another school year, does Hermione forgo a ski trip on the continent with her parents during the Yule break?
Why in second year do Draco, Crabbe, and Goyle not go home for the Yule break? Especially since there's some sort of monster lurking within Hogwarts walls that year?
The answer is that certain students decide to not even spend one day with their families during the Yule break solely to suit the author's plot.
But what does that say about the author's own view of families, and spending holidays with them?
no subject
no subject
he didn't belong to the library, so he'd never even got rude notes asking for books back
Um. So if someone has an overdue library book and is keeping other people from reading it, the library's RUDE in asking for their property back? Riiiight. JKR started off subtle with the misplaced sense of entitlement and worked up to things like rules bending in favor of our protagonists and getting away with repugnant behavior.
I know it seems like a small thing to pick on, but...it really stands out to me, considering how she later depicts breaking rules and defying authority as virtues, and demonizes characters who try to enforce rules and standards.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Also, I love that idea, totally sounds like something Pince would do. Didn't she rig jinxes in the books to do nasty things to the kids if they mistreated it? (is that fanon? I seem to have a strong recollection of it, but that's no guarantee)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject