[identity profile] danajsparks.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] deathtocapslock
In some interview, J.K. Rowling apparently said that Britain's wizarding population is roughly divided into 25% muggle-born, 50% half-blood, and 25% pureblood. However, while JKR may have said that 25% of witches and wizards are muggle-born, this is not what she has actually shown in canon.

In Harry's year at Hogwarts, there are only two confirmed muggle-born students in canon: Hermione Granger and Justin Finch-Fletchley. JKR's early class list also shows Hannah Abbott and Terry Boot as muggle-borns, but she apparently later either forgot this or changed her mind, for we learn in DH that some of Hannah's family is buried in a wizarding cemetery, and Terry was able to attend Hogwarts when Voldemort was in control. JKR originally imagined Harry's class as having 40 students, but only 30 students are ever mentioned in canon, and only 25 are mentioned elsewhere besides the sorting ceremony. 2 out of 40 students would mean that 5% of the class is definitely muggle-born. 2 out of 30 would mean that 6.66% is muggle-born. 2 out of 25 would make 8% of the class muggle-born. Any of these percentages is much lower than 25%.

(Note: Apparently I can't count, so I've had to change these percentages a few times. Hopefully they're correct now.)

Furthermore, (as far as I can remember) we only meet 3 other muggle-born students at Hogwarts: Penelope Clearwater and the two Creevey Brothers. And we only know of three muggle-borns from the previous generation: Lily Evans, Ted Tonks, and Dirk Cresswell. Again, these numbers suggest that the percentage of wizards and witches who are muggle-born is much lower than 25%

ETA: Oryx reminded me Add Mary McDonalds and the Mary who was on trial during the trio's Ministry invasion (though the two may be the same person, under her maiden and married names).

Another sign of a low percentage of muggle-borns is the WW's ignorance of muggle culture and technology. If muggle-borns were really 25% of the wizarding population, I believe that they would have had significantly more influence on wizarding culture. Wizards would have assimilated and adapted more muggle sports, muggle board games, film, television, etc.

The data I used for these calculations can be found here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0Asq6Ul6gdxBCdDlMRHoxU0NVaHA5SXQtQzRiRFI0Smc&output=html If the blood status is in parentheses, that means it was shown that way in JKR's notes, but unverified or contradicted in canon.

Date: 2011-03-25 12:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lynn-waterfall.livejournal.com
Second, we don't know anything about population growth in the WW, nor the birthrate among purebloods compared to half-bloods and muggle-born.

Oh, absolutely. I had to assume that there was no difference in order to say anything.

Third, we don't know how many muggle-born marry other muggle-born, half-bloods, or muggles, instead of purebloods.

Also very true. I tend to think that when JKR came up with the ratios she did, she was probably figuring that most Muggleborns married someone who wasn't also a Muggleborn. (Or a Muggle.) If all Muggleborns marry non-Muggleborns, and no one in the WW marries Muggles, then the 25-50-25 fits perfectly. Even 1% of non-Muggleborns marrying Muggles produces 4x halfbloods, though.

I think it's probably safe to say that, while a majority of the population may technically be "pure," a significantly smaller percentage of purebloods have bloodlines that are completely magical for more than a few generations back.

Yeah. Even with Ernie's line in CoS, "you can trace my family back through nine generations of witches and warlocks and my blood’s as pure as anyone’s," that first part may only refer to one ancestral line after the three generations required to be a pureblood.

Date: 2011-03-25 02:23 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
Hem, Arthur's mother was a Black, so no. And one of Molly's uncles married a Black without her getting burnt off the family tree, so I doubt that, unless the Muggle component was on Molly's maternal line.

Date: 2011-03-25 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
Septimus was considered a blood-traitor. You can't be one without being pure-blood in the first place (or where would the treason be?).

Date: 2011-03-25 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
I thought the traitorous part might, in part, be that the Weasley men marry muggle-born or half-blood women every few generations in order to keep the line robust.

IMO blood-traitor means a pureblood who has odd, non-traditional political inclinations. The Weasleys are just like the Blacks, but with red hair and no style.

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2026 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios