The Muggle-Born Population
Mar. 24th, 2011 04:23 pmIn some interview, J.K. Rowling apparently said that Britain's wizarding population is roughly divided into 25% muggle-born, 50% half-blood, and 25% pureblood. However, while JKR may have said that 25% of witches and wizards are muggle-born, this is not what she has actually shown in canon.
In Harry's year at Hogwarts, there are only two confirmed muggle-born students in canon: Hermione Granger and Justin Finch-Fletchley. JKR's early class list also shows Hannah Abbott and Terry Boot as muggle-borns, but she apparently later either forgot this or changed her mind, for we learn in DH that some of Hannah's family is buried in a wizarding cemetery, and Terry was able to attend Hogwarts when Voldemort was in control. JKR originally imagined Harry's class as having 40 students, but only 30 students are ever mentioned in canon, and only 25 are mentioned elsewhere besides the sorting ceremony. 2 out of 40 students would mean that 5% of the class is definitely muggle-born. 2 out of 30 would mean that 6.66% is muggle-born. 2 out of 25 would make 8% of the class muggle-born. Any of these percentages is much lower than 25%.
(Note: Apparently I can't count, so I've had to change these percentages a few times. Hopefully they're correct now.)
Furthermore, (as far as I can remember) we only meet 3 other muggle-born students at Hogwarts: Penelope Clearwater and the two Creevey Brothers. And we only know of three muggle-borns from the previous generation: Lily Evans, Ted Tonks, and Dirk Cresswell. Again, these numbers suggest that the percentage of wizards and witches who are muggle-born is much lower than 25%
ETA: Oryx reminded me Add Mary McDonalds and the Mary who was on trial during the trio's Ministry invasion (though the two may be the same person, under her maiden and married names).
Another sign of a low percentage of muggle-borns is the WW's ignorance of muggle culture and technology. If muggle-borns were really 25% of the wizarding population, I believe that they would have had significantly more influence on wizarding culture. Wizards would have assimilated and adapted more muggle sports, muggle board games, film, television, etc.
The data I used for these calculations can be found here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0Asq6Ul6gdxBCdDlMRHoxU0NVaHA5SXQtQzRiRFI0Smc&output=html If the blood status is in parentheses, that means it was shown that way in JKR's notes, but unverified or contradicted in canon.
In Harry's year at Hogwarts, there are only two confirmed muggle-born students in canon: Hermione Granger and Justin Finch-Fletchley. JKR's early class list also shows Hannah Abbott and Terry Boot as muggle-borns, but she apparently later either forgot this or changed her mind, for we learn in DH that some of Hannah's family is buried in a wizarding cemetery, and Terry was able to attend Hogwarts when Voldemort was in control. JKR originally imagined Harry's class as having 40 students, but only 30 students are ever mentioned in canon, and only 25 are mentioned elsewhere besides the sorting ceremony. 2 out of 40 students would mean that 5% of the class is definitely muggle-born. 2 out of 30 would mean that 6.66% is muggle-born. 2 out of 25 would make 8% of the class muggle-born. Any of these percentages is much lower than 25%.
(Note: Apparently I can't count, so I've had to change these percentages a few times. Hopefully they're correct now.)
Furthermore, (as far as I can remember) we only meet 3 other muggle-born students at Hogwarts: Penelope Clearwater and the two Creevey Brothers. And we only know of three muggle-borns from the previous generation: Lily Evans, Ted Tonks, and Dirk Cresswell. Again, these numbers suggest that the percentage of wizards and witches who are muggle-born is much lower than 25%
ETA: Oryx reminded me Add Mary McDonalds and the Mary who was on trial during the trio's Ministry invasion (though the two may be the same person, under her maiden and married names).
Another sign of a low percentage of muggle-borns is the WW's ignorance of muggle culture and technology. If muggle-borns were really 25% of the wizarding population, I believe that they would have had significantly more influence on wizarding culture. Wizards would have assimilated and adapted more muggle sports, muggle board games, film, television, etc.
The data I used for these calculations can be found here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0Asq6Ul6gdxBCdDlMRHoxU0NVaHA5SXQtQzRiRFI0Smc&output=html If the blood status is in parentheses, that means it was shown that way in JKR's notes, but unverified or contradicted in canon.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 01:32 pm (UTC)Purebloods: Malfoy (S), Crabbe (S), Goyle (S), Parkinson (S), Greengrass (S), Longbottom (G), Weasley (G), Brown (G), MacDougal (R), Macmillan (H)
Halfbloods: Bulstrode (S), Potter (G), Finnigan (G), Thomas (G), Brocklehurst (R), Li (R), Abbott (H), Bones (H), Hopkins (H)
Muggleborns: Granger (G), Finch-Fletchley (H)
Unknown: Davis (S), “a girl with glasses“ (S), Parvati Patil (G), Padma Patil (R), Dunbar (G), “a ginger girl” (G), Turpin (R), Corner (R), Boot (R), Goldstein (R), Jones (H), Leanne (H)
Note: The Patil twins and Fay Dunbar are sorted as unknown, but given they knew Pansy before they started Hogwarts and some of their comments suggest they aren't familiar with Muggle technology etc., they must be either half- or purebloods. Same goes for Tracey Davis, Michael Corner, Terry Boot, Anthony Goldstein and Zacharias Smith.
So out of the total of 33 there are 10 purebloods, 9 halfbloods, 2 muggleborns and 12 students of unknown blood status (8 of whom are most likely half- or purebloods.)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 03:35 pm (UTC)Where are the mentions of the Slytherin girl with glasses or Gryffindor ginger girl? (At least in which chapter are they mentioned?)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 08:05 pm (UTC)Hannah Abbott is an interesting case. According to the class list, she was supposed to be Muggle-born. According to interview, she was pureblood in Rowling's head. When fans confronted her with the contradiction she made her half-blood in interview. So I don't take anything outside the books as canon, though some of it may indicate Rowling's thought process at some time point or other.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 03:59 pm (UTC)I don't quite understand how your friend settled on this list.
It looks like she included characters that appear in the films and video games. Leanne and Fay Dunbar are both in the films. And there's also a girl with glasses in Slytherin in the films.
Hopkins, Jones, and Li are three of the characters that are on the class list, but not in canon. But she didn't include the other 5 shown on the class list.
She also left out Moon and Perks, who were named in the sorting ceremony.
Zabini and Nott are also missing from this list.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:10 pm (UTC)Actually, I just realized that I had included Tracey Davis as being in canon, when she's not. That changes the results of my calculations slightly.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:12 pm (UTC)Yeah, I noticed that too when I first saw the table, but forgot to ask her about it later. The percentage doesn't seem perfectly correct, either. It'd need some polishing and proof-reading, but I think the table is something one can work with when trying to determine the structure of wizarding society, because Harry's year is the most complete sample we have. I won't be the one to correct the mistakes, though, I'm not nearly enough of an expert. :p
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 04:58 pm (UTC)https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0Asq6Ul6gdxBCdDlMRHoxU0NVaHA5SXQtQzRiRFI0Smc&output=html
no subject
Date: 2011-03-26 05:35 pm (UTC)