Sep. 25th, 2011

[identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com
Books are canon.

Movies are not canon.

Interviews are not canon.

Are we to regard Pottermore, and the information released in it, as canon?


I.e., when Pottermore contradicts something in one of the books, is that a canon inconsistency or do we just ignore Pottermore?

When Pottermore contradicts a pet theory, must we adjust the theory or ignore Pottermore?

Can we come to a group consensus on this?

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2026 03:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios