http://danajsparks.livejournal.com/ (
danajsparks.livejournal.com) wrote in
deathtocapslock2011-10-28 05:50 pm
Entry tags:
Wards
I'm wondering where the idea of magical protective wards comes from. It's a fairly ubiquitous concept in HP fan fiction, but I'm not finding anything about wards in the books. There is the blood protection on 4 Privet Drive, but I don't think that's ever called a ward.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Protective charms/enchantments are also mentioned when Sirius describes how his father protected 12GP. (Also Tom's protection of his cave by the sea and the locket within it.)
no subject
Sirius says that his father put "every security measure known to wizard kind" on Grimmauld Place, but only says specifically that it's unplottable.
But I did look more carefully, and Rowling does use the language of "enchantments" throughout the books. Hogwarts has an anti-apparation "enchantment."
However, "enchantment" seems to be a rather vague term in the Potterverse. The teachers call the various protections around the philosopher's stone "enchantments," and none of those really fit the concept of wards that we find in fan fiction.
no subject
no subject
I just performed a quick word search and found lots of mentions of medical wards and St. Mungo wards, but no protective spell wards. :-)
no subject
However, searching for just "enchantments" gave me some hits in the earlier books.
Hermione says in PoA, for instance, "The castle’s protected by more than walls, you know. There are all sorts of enchantments on it, to stop people entering by stealth. You can’t just Apparate in here."
And, in HBP, Dumbledore lifts the "anti-apparation enchantment."
So, I guess there are a few examples of magic in canon that may be conceptually similar to fanon wards.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The term has been around in fantasy writing for decades. I suspect that it may be a legitimate import from people who actually researched magical ritual and theory before writing their stories, and wanted to get the vocabulary right. Of course there is no guarantee that they did so, or that the term hasn't shifted through use by people who *didn't* do their research first, but it was probably a real term once. Even if only a hypothetical one.