deathtocapslock | HBP Chapter Two: "Spinner's End"

Current Mood: bored
Current Location: Spinner's End

Entry tags:

HBP Chapter Two: "Spinner's End"

* So it turns out Snape lives in a dilapidated northern ex-industrial town. Hmm. Somehow I just can’t get my head around GrittyWorkingClass!Snape. Still, at least I can amuse myself by imagining him saying all his lines in a Yorkshire accent.

* So Bellatrix AKs the fox and kills it. I thought you had to really feel the hatred in order to cast an Unforgiveable properly? Maybe fear is a good enough motivator as well. Or she thought it was an Auror, and her hatred for them meant she could do the curse. Although “I thought perhaps it was an Auror” makes it sound like she wasn’t really sure. Maybe Bella just hates everything.

* “We must be the first of our kind ever to set foot—” Interesting. So apparently Bellatrix doesn’t consider half-bloods like Snape to be “real” wizards, and apparently Eileen didn’t count either – anybody know what her blood status was? I’d thought that she was a Pureblood, though I’m not sure where I got this from – if she was, then maybe Bella considers her to have forfeited her magical status by running off with a Muggle.

* “The place had an air of neglect, as though it were not usually inhabited.” So, is this because Snape only lives here during the school holidays, or does he normally spend the holidays in Hogwarts, and the house seems neglected because he doesn’t live here at all? I suppose it would make sense for Snape to live in Hogwarts – his room there is probably nicer than Spinner’s End – but I’m not sure why he’d have suddenly started living out.

* Snape lives with Wormtail, apparently without killing or seriously harming him, even though Wormtail betrayed Lilly to her death. So, either Snape doesn’t know who betrayed the Potters, or he’s got a really impressive amount of self-control, or the whole Lilly thing was just an explanation to give to Harry.

* Wormtail’s storyline in the later books makes no sense. For one thing, why did he go back to Voldemort? JK Rowling wants us to believe that only Voldemort could keep him safe, but why not just find a Muggle family to live with? Or a family of foreign wizards? I doubt that, say, the Japanese would know the story of Peter Pettigrew, so he’d probably be safe there.

* And the way everybody treats him with total contempt is unrealistic too. Finding and resurrecting Voldemort was quite an achievement. He ought to be given (at least grudging) fear and respect, not scornful rejection.

* And the cowardice charge seems a bit off after GOF. Cutting off his own hand as part of a magical ceremony? Eek. I know I couldn’t do that.

* Also, WTF is up with everybody calling him “Wormtail”? Why use his childhood nickname, instead of his actual name?

* I don’t know why, but the elf-made wine just seems really jarring to me. Maybe because all the other mentions of elves make them out to be low-status menial servants, not high-quality vintners. It sort of reads like JKR has just ripped something out of another fantasy world and put it here without thinking about whether it was really consistent with what she’d written elsewhere – or, to put it another way, like mediocre fan fiction.

* Most of Bellatrix’s reasons for distrusting Snape actually have a really obvious answer. He was spying on Dumbledore, so he couldn’t do anything too suspicious else he’d blow his cover. Duh.

* “And – forgive me – speaking of dangers… you were facing six teenagers, were you not?” Ooh, burn. Although as fun as it is to see Snape verbally bitchslapping people like this, I can’t help but think it would be better if rather than having characters mock the villains for their incompetence, JK Rowling had just written less incompetent villains.

* The same applies with Snape’s screed against Harry’s ineptness and extraordinary good luck. Whilst it’s nice to have a character acknowledge this for once, it would be even nicer to have a more intelligent protagonist.

* So… apparently the half-blood Snape is “Draco’s favourite teacher”, “Lucius’ old friend”, “the Dark Lord’s favourite, his most trusted advisor” – even allowing for a bit of exaggeration here, can you imagine a Jew being told something like this in fascist Germany? No, neither can I. Surprisingly tolerant bad guys 1, pasted-on Nazi analogies 0.

* Sooo, with the Unbreakable Vows… who gets to decide whether Snape is really helping Draco “to the best of his ability”? Or whether it seems that Draco will fail at his task? Is that the Bonder’s job?

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Heh, I loved this chapter just for the verbal skewering. But word on the incompetent villains and all.

I actually found working-class Snape immediately believable, I think for a number of reasons. Partly it fits with the sense I always had of him as someone who knew deprivation of some kind, but partly it comes from his habits, especially his rigid formality. Those born to the higher classes don't work so hard at formality and or loudly insist on maintaining it - they act like Draco and Lucius, comfortable and entitled. The ones who put such *visible* effort into constant formality and demanding shows of respect tend to be those striving for acceptance into a class higher than the one they were born into, and acutely conscious therefore of all the little things they are having to learn and work at in order to not appear lower-class. (But YES on Yorkshire Snape. Heh. XD Though he'd probably have worked at ironing out his accent as part of the trying-for-posh bit.)

RE Eileen, the Trio assume she's a pureblood, but we're never given confirmation of this fact. I like the Princes = purebloods idea myself, but there's relatively little direct canon support for it; it's really supposition. (Though I'm sure that JKR *meant* us to read her as pure, and to thus read Snape's story as a parallel to Voldie's, Voldie-lite, just as she meant Voldie's story to parallel the legend of Hitler's Jewish ancestry.)

I hear you on the cowardice thing. I think we're meant to read him as a coward because he preferred living, and doing whatever it took to stay alive, to dying. See Sirius' rant in the shack - 'courage' = willingness to die, the more pointlessly and grandstandingly, the better. That's why Gryffindor 'bravery' is meant to be the moral opposite of Slytherin cunning and self-preservation, and Harry's passive unthinking lamb-act is the thing that will defeat Voldie's Evil focus on never dying. The 'Wormtail' moniker: I have no Watsonian explanation (why and how would the DE's even know the nickname?), but Doyalistically I feel that it's probably an unconscious expression of JKR's contempt for the character. Just like the way she *always* has to remind us that the evil Slytherins are ugly according to conventional standards, with thinning hair or thick waistlines or pimples or bad teeth or greasy hair, etc.

Elf-made wine: WORD. I think she slipped into conventional fantasy pseudo-Tolkienism there for a minute and nobody in her editor's office (did she still have one?) noticed because hey, she DOES have elves.... Unless we were supposed to think of Dobby's cousin laboring to painstakingly squeeze each grape by hand, and conclude that *obviously* Snape is evil like the Malfoys because he relies upon exploited elf labor for his leisure?

It's not just the Malfoy connection and 'most favored' bit that require a bit of stretching when looked at in the context of what JKR TOLD us about the DEs and Snape - it's the whole idea that he ever voluntarily became a DE at all. Why on earth would a literal half-blood, even one with father issues, want to join a pureblood supremacist movement, and, more importantly, why on EARTH would these supposed supremacists want HIM in their exclusive club? Bella clearly doesn't think he belongs at this party, and it's not like he's on the list of political or strategic must-haves like Barty. So why did Voldie issue nobody-Snape the gilded invitation, and why did Sev accept it? (Also, what is up with Hagrid's assertion that Voldie tried to recruit the Potters?) I think a lot of the (admittedly very interesting) speculation about abusive!Tobias and Voldie feeling some personal connection to a fellow rejected half-blood come out of a need to make sense of this. I think the pasteded-on-yay Nazi imagery serves more to distract us from the actual specifics of what's going on more than it helps to clarify anything, grr.

I hear you on the cowardice thing. I think we're meant to read him as a coward because he preferred living, and doing whatever it took to stay alive, to dying. See Sirius' rant in the shack - 'courage' = willingness to die, the more pointlessly and grandstandingly, the better. That's why Gryffindor 'bravery' is meant to be the moral opposite of Slytherin cunning and self-preservation, and Harry's passive unthinking lamb-act is the thing that will defeat Voldie's Evil focus on never dying.

You know, to me this seems a lot less brave than just plain stupid. I mean, just to be pragmatic, isn't it a lot better to survive and be able to fight again, so you can be, y'know, actually useful?

Also, you make a really good point about Snape and the DE's. It kind of seems like JKR wanted to lump all of her bad-ish guys together, even if it didn't make sense. Other than Umbridge, but she is actually is an effective villain. I didn't originally feel this way, but the more that she tried to bring in Nazis, the less it really worked. I mean, Nazis and pseudo-nazis are kind of the go to villain, but they have been horribly overused. I know that villains can be hard to write- heck, I have had issues with this myself as an amateur writer, but nowadays Nazis are kind of a cop-out. Especially when the writer doesn't seem to understand how the original ones got into power in the first place.

"I hear you on the cowardice thing. I think we're meant to read him as a coward because he preferred living, and doing whatever it took to stay alive, to dying."

So that means Voldemort is a coward for making all those Horcruxes? ;)

Although seriously, that's another reason why Voldemort shouldn't show so much contempt for Pettigrew. He *knows* how powerful a motivator fear of death can be. If Voldie's spent most of his life trying to conquer death by making loads of Horcruxes, he ought to be a little bit more cautious of Pettigrew. Because after all, being willing to betray your best friend and mutilate yourself to avoid death isn't pathetic, it's *scary*. There's no telling what such a person might end up doing.

Hmm, maybe that's why Voldemort treats Peter so badly: he's trying to crush the man's self-esteem, make sure he won't turn on Voldemort like he turned on Lilly and James.

/So that means Voldemort is a coward for making all those Horcruxes?/

Well, considering that Harry told him to “be a man” when he was taunting him about feeling some remorse in DH, I think that we are supposed to think of him as a coward in a way. Especially since Dumbledore tells him that he’s wrong for thinking that there’s nothing worse than death in OotP.

/that's another reason why Voldemort shouldn't show so much contempt for Pettigrew. He *knows* how powerful a motivator fear of death can be. If Voldie's spent most of his life trying to conquer death by making loads of Horcruxes, he ought to be a little bit more cautious of Pettigrew. Because after all, being willing to betray your best friend and mutilate yourself to avoid death isn't pathetic, it's *scary*. There's no telling what such a person might end up doing./

Exactly! Voldemort should be the one to truly see what Peter’s potential is, to see through Peter’s show of subservience. In fact, that could be a good reason for why Peter became a Death Eater in the first place, because he felt that Voldemort was the only person to truly appreciate his gifts, instead of mocking him and writing him off as a fawning toady like everyone else did. But, of course, Voldemort’s appreciation of Peter would show him in a somewhat positive light (regardless of his actual motivations for enlisting Peter), so he has to constantly mock Peter to show how evil he is.

/maybe that's why Voldemort treats Peter so badly: he's trying to crush the man's self-esteem, make sure he won't turn on Voldemort like he turned on Lilly and James./

But then if the reason why Peter betrayed Lily and James was because he didn’t feel properly appreciated by them and was boiling in resentment, then Voldemort’s contempt would definitely the wrong approach to maintaining Peter’s loyalty.

It's too bad we never got to see a flashback or memory of how Voldemort treated Peter in 1981. If he did put on a show of appreciating Peter back then, it would be another point in favor of Voldemort's mind or emotional control or something having deteriorated since then, which just seems more plausible than him always being such a poor leader.

Wrt Eileen's blood status, I agree that JKR probably wanted to parallel Snape and Voldemort (and Harry) by giving a pureblood parent to each. I've come around to the idea that's actually what "half-blood" means: someone who's half a pureblood. "Halfbreed" is a concept bigots like -- half Us, half Other. I think that's where purebloods draw their limit of acceptance, and anyone who's less than half pureblooded is part of the great mass of mutts. If they cared enough to differentiate between all possible varieties of non-purebloods, they'd have separate words for them (quarterblood, semidemiquaverblood, etc etc).

Then there's Snape's silly pseud, The Half-Blood Prince. You're supposed to think it means "the prince who's a half-blood" but really it's "half-blood member of the Prince family". That's a pretty pointless distinguisher if there are other half-blood Princes around. It'd be like Harry calling himself The Magic Potter. Ergo, the Princes are purebloods.

That Voldemort might recruit a half-blood like Snape isn't all that surprising. Snape was Lucius's protegé, he was brilliant, it's not like anyone was going to have to marry him. I doubt Voldemort cared one way or the other about his blood status (is there any evidence that he ever was genuinely prejudiced, as opposed to exploiting other people's prejudices?). He's not really the type to have fellow feelings for anyone else; I think he just liked Snape because he was useful and ambitious but loyal. But what did Snape think he was signing up for? Not Muggleborn genocide, that's for sure. JKR stated he joined the DEs to impress Lily. How on earth did he expect to impress her with an anti-Muggleborn movement of whatever stripe? Is there anyone, including the author, who has any coherent idea of Voldemort's agenda anyway?

Then there's Snape's silly pseud, The Half-Blood Prince. You're supposed to think it means "the prince who's a half-blood" but really it's "half-blood member of the Prince family". That's a pretty pointless distinguisher if there are other half-blood Princes around. It'd be like Harry calling himself The Magic Potter. Ergo, the Princes are purebloods.

That assumes Severus was distinguishing himself from other Princes. But I doubt he knew Princes other than his mother. I took his emphasis on his blood status as being directed at his housemates as well as people like Slughorn - those who believed talent indicated pureblood status. He was saying 'see, I can invent all these spells while being a half-blood. Take that!'

JKR stated he joined the DEs to impress Lily. How on earth did he expect to impress her with an anti-Muggleborn movement of whatever stripe?

Not directly. But if he expected to learn cool things that would allow him to do something that would impress Lily then yes. Or if he could use insider knowledge to warn her and save her.

Excellent points. I'd assumed Snape was emphasizing the wizard side of his family (I may be a half-blood, but I'm one of the Princes) with a side order of boyish bragging (The owner of this book is a prince...sort of). Hadn't considered his nickname might simply mean "Half-blood Pride". But if Snape's housemates treated him like a second class citizen, to the point where this nickname was his "screw you" response, why did he at the same time take up the purebloodist cause? I'm probably missing something but why didn't he take the next logical step and reject their values completely? Was he really that delusional, or desperate for a job, or...?

Variations of internalized bigotry are a common thing. Think of 'chill girls' - those women who make it in men-dominated areas and adopt misogynystic attitudes - they are proud in how they overcame the obstacles in their way but don't think anything should be done to improve things for other women - anyone who doesn't do as well as they did probably deserves it. Also consider that the supposedly open-minded side among the wizards rejected him for being a Slytherin, for studying the Dark Arts, for existing. Whichever side he chose he'd have to deal with self-loathing. It's just a matter of which aspect of himself he'd have to loath.

Hmm. If Severus could have found an adequate source of income that was independent of politics he might have been able to stay out of the politics and eventually gained peace of mind. Darkglare has a few such scenarios. In 'Snape's Worst Memory' he becomes independently wealthy through a complicated inheritance. In 'Be careful What You Wish For' (WIP) he has an independent Dark Arts consulting business. This allows him to avoid both Tom and Albus, and handle the Ministry from a position of power.

I agree completely on working-class Snape; it just made sense to me immediately to read this character this way. In fact, Jodel had been arguing that he was working-class for years. And his extreme formality is a part of that reading.

As to the cowardice: apparently anyone who ever tries to save their own life, for whatever reason, is a coward by definition in the Potterverse. So yes, making Horcruxes is certainly a sign of cowardice.

/I thought you had to really feel the hatred in order to cast an Unforgiveable properly?/

JKR basically threw out everything that she had said about Unforgivables in DH. They apparently don’t take much effort to cast after all, they don’t actually require a sadistic intent (unless Harry really did have enough blind, seething rage towards the man whom he’d never met before who committed the unpardonable act of spitting on someone he liked), and it turns out that they’re not unforgivable, since McGonagall calls Harry “gallant” for casting one and then proceeds to cast an Unforgiveable herself right afterwards. I guess that Sirius was wrong in portraying Crouch Sr. as a zealot who went overboard when he authorized the use of Unforgivables. Apparently, Crouch Sr. was just acting that way because it was wartime. And now hundreds of fanfics will have the good guys casting Unforgivables without breaking a sweat as a result. Fantastic.

/Snape lives with Wormtail, apparently without killing or seriously harming him, even though Wormtail betrayed Lilly to her death. So, either Snape doesn’t know who betrayed the Potters, or he’s got a really impressive amount of self-control/

Many people have pointed to the latter, especially since Snape can’t risk his cover. Still, his behavior doesn’t match up with his reaction in PoA to Sirius and Remus.

/Wormtail’s storyline in the later books makes no sense. For one thing, why did he go back to Voldemort? JK Rowling wants us to believe that only Voldemort could keep him safe, but why not just find a Muggle family to live with?/

Maybe because Wormtail is evil, JKR couldn’t stand to let him get away? Or she needed him to stay in the story because he was important...even though he didn’t really end up doing much, other than assisting Voldemort in his rebirthing ceremony? Yeah, Peter’s decision makes no sense. We’re told that it’s because he was afraid of Sirius and Remus...who gave up looking for him not long after PoA. And yes, somehow Wormtail didn’t think to jump ship to another country other than Albania. Because the plot says so, I guess.

/And the way everybody treats him with total contempt is unrealistic too. Finding and resurrecting Voldemort was quite an achievement. He ought to be given (at least grudging) fear and respect, not scornful rejection./

Especially by Voldemort. Peter is someone who betrayed his friends, faked his death, has a useful Animagus form, and was responsible for Voldemort’s resurrection. Voldemort should *not* underestimate him or dismiss him as frequently as he does. At the very least, he should be wary of Peter and keep a close eye on him, in case Peter decides to stab him in the back as well.

/And the cowardice charge seems a bit off after GOF./

Actually, I think that Voldemort’s inexplicable treatment of Peter may be tied to the whole theme of “Bravery trumps all.” Even though Gryffindor and Slytherin are supposed to be deadly enemies and rivals and the polar opposites of each other, the Slytherins still have to value bravery. Snape is enraged when Harry calls him a coward, Voldemort tells Harry in PS/SS that he admires the bravery of his parents, and the source of Voldemort’s contempt for Peter seems to be Peter’s so-called cowardice. He tells Peter in GoF that he doesn’t count as a loyal servant because the only reason he went after Voldemort was because he was scared of his old friends. I think that we’re supposed to see Voldemort’s disgust towards Peter’s cringing subservience as disgust towards Peter’s cowardice.

/Also, WTF is up with everybody calling him “Wormtail”? Why use his childhood nickname, instead of his actual name?/

I’ve heard theories that “Wormtail” is supposed to signify Peter’s regression, to indicate that he’s little more than an animal now that he’s rejoined Voldemort’s forces. But yes, within the story itself, it makes no sense. Unless Snape went around telling Voldemort and all of the Death Eaters what Peter’s nickname was and that’s how everybody knew to call him Wormtail. But yes, why not just call him Pettigrew?

seething rage towards the man whom he’d never met before

Actually they did meet once before - Amycus was the one who was repeatedly failing to Cruciate Ginny.

Maybe we could fanwank some of those occasions of Slytherins being obsessed with bravery as playing to their audiences? Or maybe the Gryffindor characters weren't picking up on the sarcasm? Voldemort might have seen Peter as a major threat, someone who had had him in his power and was obviously both competent and untrustworthy (since of course he'd betray Voldemort if he thought he'd survive better that way), so he wanted to keep him psychologically beaten down - and so kept telling Peter he was a coward, guessing that that would hurt a Gryffindor the most. Which it apparently did. (Maybe not all his brain cells were gone after all.) And... um... maybe Voldemort talking to little Gryffindor Harry was hoping that a Gryffindor-approved compliment would make Harry more likely to give up the Stone, or at least distract him enough with thoughts of his brave parents to do something stupid and make it easier for Voldemort to get it off him?

Snape, I guess, could have been influenced by Lily and Dumbledore. Years of hearing about Brave James Potter could make a person touchy on that subject even if he did start out not particularly caring if anyone thought he was brave. Especially when he knew he was and no one acknowledged it.

(deleted comment)

she also looks down on the Great Unwashed

Don't forget the Gaunts, and how they've 'squandered' their money (unlike the Weasleys, I guess...)

(deleted comment)

Don't forget the Dursleys, who somehow have an evil upper-class aunt (Marge) and a son who acts like a working-class yob (boxing, hanging around on estates, beating up kids) rather than, say, playing rugby, entering posh nightclubs on a fake ID, using cocaine, etc.

So... she is Petunia Dursley? I'm kind of surprised that she treats her with that much contempt, considering how similar they are.

I'm not. I doubt JKR sees herself as having the less savory aspects of the bourgeoisie (or on the other hand, doesn't acknowledge them as faults/prejudices). So she can happily project all of her worst impulses onto Petunia, and mock them, without having to interrogate her own attitudes. (I doubt this is a very conscious process, though.) It's a natural human tendency to do exactly this.

While it may be a natural human tendency, I admit that I find it to be more than a little creepy.

On the other hand, I actually find Petunia to be somewhat sympathetic, what with her supposedly perfect, adored by all sister. I can definitely see why she would be less than kind to her nephew, even though I don't condone her behavior.

Am I the only one who feels sympathy for Petunia?

I think Terri writes a sympathetic Petunia in her Unlikely Allies series as well as related fics.

I feel for her too. She obviously knows at least enough to know that *someone* dangerous, and magical, is out to harm Harry - which means all of her family is in the line of fire. She's clearly terrified, and even the so-called good guy wizards treat her like dogshit, starting with Dumbledore's letter and assumption that *of course* she'll just put her family in danger for the sake of the sister who abandoned her, no need to actually knock on the door and talk to her like she was human first. She's in a terrible place, with basically no real support and no way of defending herself and her family. That will warp you, certainly. Doesn't mean what she does is ok, but I fully empathize with her. (Also, you should check out raisin-gal's Ode to Petunia Dursley for a bit of meta on this subject.)

Pretty much this. Really, she had no real reason to keep Harry rather than giving him up for foster care other than because she was (presumably) threatened. Again, I'm not condoning what she does, but no wonder she seems to hate Harry. The whole situation is just all kinds of messed up.

At the same time, of course, as a good little Middle Class girl, she also looks down on the Great Unwashed, and so we have Working Class Snape, who is a churlish Northerner and who spits on the ground after a Quidditch match.

And Crabbe and Goyle, who speak with working-class dumbo accents and have pudding-basin haircuts.

Which makes no sense, since Crabbe and Goyle are supposed to be upper-class. You can still sound dumb even without a stereotypical accent.

Are they? Not all purebloods are upper class. And now we get told they aren't even 'old' purebloods, they may have had a Muggle ancestor or two some 4-5 generations ago. I see no upper-class indicators associated with them.

For a detailed picture of what Severus' home might have been like, see Whitehound's essay 'Spinner's End' (link in a separate post).

I thought you had to really feel the hatred in order to cast an Unforgiveable properly?

No, you just really want it to happen. The hatred part is fan speculation/interpretation. I understand that urban foxes are quite the pests in Britain.

So apparently Bellatrix doesn’t consider half-bloods like Snape to be “real” wizards,

In contrast to the Malfoys. But we know the Malfoys are the more pragmatic ones. Also, this should be yet another reason to suspect what Sirius said in GOF about that 'gang of Slytherins' that Severus was supposedly associated with. At best Sirius was referring to some occasion where Severus was tagging along his friend Avery who was meeting Bella for some purpose.

“The place had an air of neglect, as though it were not usually inhabited.” So, is this because Snape only lives here during the school holidays, or does he normally spend the holidays in Hogwarts, and the house seems neglected because he doesn’t live here at all?

Severus only comes there for the summer. (Supposedly only Filch stays in the castle in the summer. Which makes me wonder about Sybil - didn't Albus hire her to keep her away from Voldemort's reach? How does that work if she leaves school for several weeks every year?) Especially now that Tom was back - Severus needed a place where he could be reached by DEs.

Elf-made wine: Makes me wonder if elves control the wizarding food industry.

I'm not surprised about how the Malfoys treat Severus. They are not idealists. Severus' relationship with Tom should come up in one of my essays in my series about the first war.

Severus only comes there for the summer. (Supposedly only Filch stays in the castle in the summer. Which makes me wonder about Sybil - didn't Albus hire her to keep her away from Voldemort's reach? How does that work if she leaves school for several weeks every year?)

Surely someone watches the animals?

The animals are on the grounds, not in the castle. IOW Hagrid doesn't count.

The link to whitehound's essay: Spinner's End

Snape as working-class Northerner definitely works for me, though I'd put his accent on the other side of the Pennines.

Re Bellatrix's comment and her view of Eileen, it's clear that Bella's never been to Spinners End before, so she might not realise this was Snape's childhood home, as opposed to a place that he moved to in later years. However, as you suggest, 'our kind' may simply mean 'pure-blood witches who haven't demeaned themselves by marrying Muggles'.

I'd always assumed that Severus would have known that Pettigrew was the Potters' betrayer from the end of Harry's third year onwards, that Dumbledore would eventually have explained things to him, though perhaps that was expecting too much. However, it would be difficult for Severus not to put to and two together when he saw Pettigrew with Voldemort. As to Severus's attitude to Pettigrew, I think that one reason why he had been placed with him at Spinners End was precisely so that Voldemort could see how Severus behaved towards Lily's betrayer, and Severus' self-control was one of the reasons for Voldemort accepting that Severus had 'desired her, that was all'. After all, Pettigrew had probably given Voldemort a run-down on how Severus was beside himself when confronted with Lily's supposed betrayer, Sirius, in the Shrieking Shack, and Severus would have had to pass that off as anger at his boyhood enemy. And that history probably does explain one reason why Severus is able to exercise self-control - Sirius was his attacker, the one who almost got him killed by a werewolf, whereas Pettigrew was simply a creepy hanger-on.

I agree that at least a part of Snape's 'lack of control' in the Shrieking Shack over Sirius is not 'just' about Lily's death. The attempted murder (as Snape sees it) of the Werewolf Incident certainly helps fuel it, however I think that a great deal of it is brought on by Snape's belief that Sirius is out to kill Harry, whom Snape has promised to protect.

One would think that would help Snape keep his cool, but I think this is one of the clues of just how much Snape had come to care for Harry - whether he would admit it to himself or not. Part of all that anger I think is that of enraged protective 'parent' seeing their 'child' in what they believe is utmost danger.

And even then, Snape manages to stay pretty composed. At least IN the Shack. It isn't until later (after the probable concussion and multiple head knocks) that Snape loses it up at Hogwarts.

When Narcissa starts to tell Severus why she came, he stops her and opens a door with a bang and Wormtail scurries away.

Then Snape says "My apologies, He has lately taken to listening at doors, I don't know what he means by it...You were saying Narcissa?"

I'd say Snape knows exactly what Peter is up to and knows a slip in front of Peter would be disastrous.

Yes - he's warning Narcissa (& Bella) that Peter's listening in.

Re: Severus' rise among the DEs: Compare to the status of Mischlinge (cross-breeds) in Nazi Germany. According to wikipedia:

According to historian and Israeli Army and U.S. Marine Corps veteran Bryan Mark Rigg, up to 160,000 one-quarter, one-half, and even full Jewish men served in the German armed forces during World War II, including several generals and at least one field marshal, Erhard Milch.

There's a wonderful one-shot story by 'Rumour of An Alchemist' called "The Dark Lord's Right Hand 2" which has this to say about Muggleborns to the DEs when one joins up:

quote: "There had been a few unpleasant disciplinary incidents in which the Dark Lord had had to remind some Death Eaters that mudbloods were traitors and enemies, whereas muggle-borns were friends and allies – in much the same sense that there was a difference between blood-traitors and other pure-bloods – and the Dark Lord had pointed out that if anyone wished to convince him otherwise, it was up to him or her to demonstrate that they were more valuable servants."

I think it a very practical point of view on that specific AU Voldy.

As far as Snape is considered, I think he was joining less to fight Muggleborns and more to fight for a merit-based society. He saw Lily as vastly different from what he thought would be the typical muggleborn - note what he tells her when she asked if it mattered. And he surely saw her as qualified to place in Slytherin.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

HBP Chapter Two: "Spinner's End"

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject