I don't think Dumbledore could have found out anything important, since he did not visit Godric's Hollow that day. He sent Hagrid to pick up Harry, the only survivor and witness.
He might have been sincere in wanting to give Harry to the Dursleys, so that he would be protected from all his fame until he's older. Later, when he found out about the blood protection, he might have decided to keep Harry at the Dursleys, even though they were clearly abusive.
Do the books specify when did Dumbledore learn about Tom's horcruxes? Because if it's after Voldemort's fall, he was probably sincere in giving Harry to Dursleys.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-09-14 08:37 pm (UTC)He might have been sincere in wanting to give Harry to the Dursleys, so that he would be protected from all his fame until he's older. Later, when he found out about the blood protection, he might have decided to keep Harry at the Dursleys, even though they were clearly abusive.
Do the books specify when did Dumbledore learn about Tom's horcruxes? Because if it's after Voldemort's fall, he was probably sincere in giving Harry to Dursleys.