Dec. 24th, 2011

[identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com
Someone in the Mary-j-59 thread on prejudice against Muggles made me realize something. S/he pointed out that Harry never attacked the Dursleys in his childish magical outbreaks.

And I realized that this was true.

Potter )
[identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com
Upon reflection, Voldemort’s grandiose and utterly unnecessary kidnapping/murder scheme in GoF wasn’t actually as stupid as we thought. We fans criticized: Why not have Barty/Moody just toss the kid a Portkey in class? (Or, if witnesses mattered, any time Barty might corner Harry alone in the halls?)

We haven’t been thinking about how it would have seemed if Tom’s scheme had worked out the way he’d planned.

Tom didn’t just plot a random kidnapping/resurrection/murder, after all. He’d planned another frame. In his early career, remember, he never left home without one.

To paraphrase Lois McMaster Bujold, Memory, a frame is supposed to come with a picture in it. And we fans have been evaluating Tom’s plan in GoF without ever envisioning the picture Tom had originally intended to present sketched around Harry’s inviting corpse.

No one (except those conversant with the relevant literary convention and expecting it to apply in this case) could possibly have anticipated Potter’s survival, after all.

This post is due entirely to oneandthetruth’s suggestion that I should evaluate the Death Eater’s performance under Voldemort’s leadership in terms of how well they .achieved his stated goals.
Only )

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 10:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios