Date: 2010-01-05 04:51 pm (UTC)
That timing certainly would have eliminated the need to stop the story for Dumbledore's coy attempt to self-efface, then pick up the action after the lull. The problem is that we would still end up with Dumbledore ignoring Tom Pitiful while explaining everything (and failing for this reader -- the whole superior, sacrificial blood thing seemed pastede on yay and offensive upon reflection, and Potter's mastery of death was empty calories).

I agree with those who say that this scene would have been better without Dumbledore. Where were the more-conflicted and therefore more-interesting Slytherin characters?

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 07:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios