GOF Chapter 2: The Scar
Jan. 9th, 2011 10:11 pmHarry wakes up with his scar hurting. We are let to understand that he experienced the events of the previous chapter as a dream. He quickly starts forgetting the details so as to keep him from noticing when relevant information pops up again. BTW from what POV did he experience the vision? Starting from the following year his visions will be from Voldemort's POV but this does not seem to be the case this instance. Consistency? What consistency?
The description of Harry's room shows he was already on his way to becoming the worst slob child hero in the history of literature. Didn't living in a closet teach him to appreciate having space?
Harry can't even see a cat in the darkness (sorry Harry, your Head of House doesn't spend her summer spying on you) so he concludes there can't be any wizard lurking outside. Despite knowing at least one way to be invisible and knowing that some wizards don't need a cloak to be invisible.
Bizarre accidents and injuries are unavoidable at Hogwarts, which is why it is such a safe place.
The Dursleys weren't of any help to Harry while awake. Except by magically protecting him from Voldemort, just the wizard he feared might be near. OK, they didn't have to be awake for the protection to work, but their being awake didn't hinder it either. (I know Harry didn't know of the protection yet, it's just that he makes judgments in ignorance.)
The story about Harry supposedly attending St Brutus' Secure Center for Incurably Criminal Boys is now the official line the Dusrleys tell anyone. How does that fit with their desire to project the 'perfectly normal' image? (Note the foreshadowing of Barty entering Harry to the Tournament as a student from a different school.)
Voldemort is still "the most powerful Dark wizard for a century". Maybe the ones before him were Albus and Gellert, in the summer of 1899. Just under a century ago - the timing almost works. Gellert never came back to Britain and Albus thinks he abandoned Dark magic, under some definition thereof.
Harry thinks there was a fortnight to go until his return to school. Looks like ending his math education at 11 didn't do him good.
Harry's assessment of Hermione's probable response is realistic. However why does not knowing where Albus went for the summer preclude writing to him? Not knowing where Sirius was didn't stop Harry from writing to him. Ah, he's ashamed to look stupid for saying his scar hurt. What about including that it hurt while he was having a vision of Voldemort killing someone? Why would this look stupid to Dumbledore rather than, say, informative? But a Gryffindor can't afford to appear weak in any way, even if this means hiding potentially crucial information.
Arthur is described as a 'fully qualified wizard'. Aren't almost all adult wizards? How meaningful is this description? Again, Harry's fear of appearing weak to the Weasleys trumps any common sense.
Only Dumbledore believed the trio's story about Sirius. Maybe because he was the only one who heard it in detail from Sirius. Anyone else present (Severus, Fudge, Poppy) just heard kids insisting on something. Severus also heard Sirius and Remus admitting to being serial liars. And was repeatedly injured by Sirius (after already being injured by the kids) and thus was denied a chance to receive evidence of the truth.
So Harry writes to Sirius. The part about Dudley's diet looks like Harry already mentioned the diet in a previous letter, but on the previous page I got the impression this was the first time Harry writes to Sirius. Oh well.
Dudley is ridiculous for enjoying a game called "Mega-Mutilation Part Three". That's because Harry goes to a school where kids learn how to really mutilate each other.
Again, Harry avoids mentioning any part of his dream. Nor does he date his letter. How is Sirius going to know when 'this morning' refers to? Why be helpful to adults whose advice you are seeking?
The description of Harry's room shows he was already on his way to becoming the worst slob child hero in the history of literature. Didn't living in a closet teach him to appreciate having space?
Harry can't even see a cat in the darkness (sorry Harry, your Head of House doesn't spend her summer spying on you) so he concludes there can't be any wizard lurking outside. Despite knowing at least one way to be invisible and knowing that some wizards don't need a cloak to be invisible.
Bizarre accidents and injuries are unavoidable at Hogwarts, which is why it is such a safe place.
The Dursleys weren't of any help to Harry while awake. Except by magically protecting him from Voldemort, just the wizard he feared might be near. OK, they didn't have to be awake for the protection to work, but their being awake didn't hinder it either. (I know Harry didn't know of the protection yet, it's just that he makes judgments in ignorance.)
The story about Harry supposedly attending St Brutus' Secure Center for Incurably Criminal Boys is now the official line the Dusrleys tell anyone. How does that fit with their desire to project the 'perfectly normal' image? (Note the foreshadowing of Barty entering Harry to the Tournament as a student from a different school.)
Voldemort is still "the most powerful Dark wizard for a century". Maybe the ones before him were Albus and Gellert, in the summer of 1899. Just under a century ago - the timing almost works. Gellert never came back to Britain and Albus thinks he abandoned Dark magic, under some definition thereof.
Harry thinks there was a fortnight to go until his return to school. Looks like ending his math education at 11 didn't do him good.
Harry's assessment of Hermione's probable response is realistic. However why does not knowing where Albus went for the summer preclude writing to him? Not knowing where Sirius was didn't stop Harry from writing to him. Ah, he's ashamed to look stupid for saying his scar hurt. What about including that it hurt while he was having a vision of Voldemort killing someone? Why would this look stupid to Dumbledore rather than, say, informative? But a Gryffindor can't afford to appear weak in any way, even if this means hiding potentially crucial information.
Arthur is described as a 'fully qualified wizard'. Aren't almost all adult wizards? How meaningful is this description? Again, Harry's fear of appearing weak to the Weasleys trumps any common sense.
Only Dumbledore believed the trio's story about Sirius. Maybe because he was the only one who heard it in detail from Sirius. Anyone else present (Severus, Fudge, Poppy) just heard kids insisting on something. Severus also heard Sirius and Remus admitting to being serial liars. And was repeatedly injured by Sirius (after already being injured by the kids) and thus was denied a chance to receive evidence of the truth.
So Harry writes to Sirius. The part about Dudley's diet looks like Harry already mentioned the diet in a previous letter, but on the previous page I got the impression this was the first time Harry writes to Sirius. Oh well.
Dudley is ridiculous for enjoying a game called "Mega-Mutilation Part Three". That's because Harry goes to a school where kids learn how to really mutilate each other.
Again, Harry avoids mentioning any part of his dream. Nor does he date his letter. How is Sirius going to know when 'this morning' refers to? Why be helpful to adults whose advice you are seeking?
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-14 07:41 pm (UTC)But considering that Snape does not hesitate to throw "You're just like your father!" into Harry's face at the least provocation
This is not true canonically. It took Severus 2.5 years to say it the first time, and the provocation was rather extreme. All but one of the times he said it were under rather extreme provocation.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-15 12:15 am (UTC)Totally ignores the point I was making...
But once again I bow to your vast store of knowledge, which you never fail to point out is vastly superior to my own.
Again I acknowledge how very stupid I am, I don't know why I even bother posting here.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-15 07:00 am (UTC)Since Severus does not in fact compare Harry to his father at the least provocation we do not know how any Weasley other than Ron did in his class, because we have no basis to think he would have made a point to equate Ron with any of them. He does not compare Ron to the twins either - but then I think the twins were a weird case - they failed the Potions OWL but many of their products must require Potions knowledge.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-15 02:50 pm (UTC)I got a slightly off feeling from the Dumbledore exposition at the end of SS/PS from the first time I read it. Why would the headmaster of a school allow a student's animosity toward a teacher go unchecked in any way, shape or form? By telling Harry that, he puts Snape in the wrong and Harry in the right, setting up problems for his staff and his student and his school. It was one of those moments where I was glad there were more books - I thought this and other issues would be taken care of since it wasn't at the immediate moment.
BTW, new grandbaby made her appearance a couple of days ago (see icon.) Number five in a series of six and counting, fourth granddaughter. Happily, fully and completely Muggle so, no worries about her ending up at a school like Hogwarts.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-15 03:41 pm (UTC)Happily, fully and completely Muggle so, no worries about her ending up at a school like Hogwarts.
For a few years my daughter had me worried - so many things 'disappeared' in her room or stopped working around her. ;)
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 01:07 pm (UTC)I haven't had a kid around whom things stopped working, thank goodness. It's bad enough we have problems with battery watches.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 01:54 am (UTC)Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 01:07 pm (UTC)Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 02:03 am (UTC)Lupin IMO does a similar thing with encouraging the students to laugh at the the Snape boggart; he knew what Neville thought himself likely to face and could have handled the lesson privately just in case. Instead he not only goes ahead with it, he encourages his class to mock a representation of a fellow teacher, and in a school like Hogwarts that isn't going to stay privy to the class and Lupin for five minutes. No wonder Snape was so pissed off - regardless of any personal affront that might also have been involved, it was highly inappropriate, whatever Lupin's motive. (Though I've always read adult Lupin's relationship to adult Snape as rather passive-aggressive generally, here I can buy a genuine element of wanting to help Neville too; but it was still wrong.)
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 12:29 pm (UTC)As for Lupin, more or less, it shows why he was friends with the marauders and that he never grew up either.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 04:28 pm (UTC)He only seems to grow up a bit regarding what Severus did for him with the potion after the fact, after he's lived with Fenrir's pack. By then of course it's rather too late.
Lupin has his good points too, certainly, and he's not quite the sadist that James was, but when it comes to Severus he's hardly at his best. (Nor is Severus always at his best around him, but that's not exactly something that hasn't been argued a million times by now.)
(I keep wanting to write a fanfic where Lupin pushes taking the potion back a little too late one day, so that when it accidentally gets knocked over by Crookshanks there is literally no time to brew more or even get him locked up safely...and he bites Snape. Partly I'm curious how Snape would react to becoming a werewolf, and partly I want Lupin to have to really face what he's playing with like this and see if I could get him to really grow up.)
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 04:39 pm (UTC)Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 04:45 pm (UTC)Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 08:04 pm (UTC)Yet the diehard fanatics of the series continue to give Lupin a pass on this (because Snape at least wasn't nice even if he wasn't "evil"), but continue to condemn Snape for teaching about werewolves that time he took over Lupin's class...
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 08:35 pm (UTC)/snark
While I can certainly see an element of wanting to get back at Lupin in moving up the date of teaching about werewolves (they were on the syllabus anyway, he simply rearranged the schedule), there is also a very practical element to it that fits in with the desire to keep the students safe. It happens in ch. 9, right after Lupin refuses to assure him that he is taking the potion (ch. 8), and Snape's response is to make sure the students know how to identify and deal with a werewolf.... Knowledge that is only effective RE a *transformed* werewolf; one in human form can't be told apart. It doesn't put Lupin at any actual greater risk of being discovered during the rest of the time, but Snape is assured that the students are forearmed should Lupin in fact turn out to be a danger to them.
So Lupin demeans a fellow professor's authority (for which Snape takes no direct revenge, unless I'm forgetting something), and chooses to toy with his condition regardless of the risk to the population of the castle, just for the fun of baiting Snape. Snape's method of revenge is to stick it in the eye to Lupin in a way that, although definitely pointed, does not actually increase the objective danger he faces of being uncovered, and gives the students practical information to defend themselves. If the two of them can't treat each other with real civility, I must say I prefer the toothless barb whose side-effect helps protect those at risk over the passive-aggressive game that ignores the risk to several hundred people.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-16 10:22 pm (UTC)Exactly the point I meant.
Re: Snape the teacher Good or Bad
Date: 2011-01-15 11:09 pm (UTC)I think I remember Ron saying something to the effect of Snape taking points away from the twins, or maybe it was just that the twins loose enough points for Griffindor. I think I remember the twins calling Snape a git somewhere along the way in the series.
But I always wondered about the relationship between Snape and the twins because as you point out, a lot of the stuff they do involves potion making. I'd think they'd at least be curious in Snape's class. I forget how many classes they actually get OWLS on but I thought it was a very small number.
I almost wonder about Snape and the twins because like him they are extremely creative, like how we see the young Snape, or at least interperet him from the HBP potions book.
SO I've always sort of wondered what they were like in his class, to me they had to have some kind of interest and ability. We see them make so many things that you'd think they would like his class.
The first lesson in the first book is something to do with the kind of crap they seem to like. Wasn't Snape's first class with Harry something along the line of boiles or blisters or something like that. That seems like a classic potion the weasley twins would find cool.
The other side of it is that they might have been so advanced at least in there ability to already be super creative that being in a normal classroom setting was dull to them. Maybe the twins would have done better in a already advanced class to challenge their creative abilities.