Because I'm having horrible writer's block regarding a Matthew Stover poem, I've decided to update my Tales of Beedle The Bard recaps! :D
Kyoshi Warrior gear, don't fail me now...
Summary Of The Story: Guy doesn't want to fall in love -- because he kind of thinks that falling in love is for pussies. :P -- so he seals his heart away in a distant room. Fair maiden arrives to help him out. Guy's hairy heart (?!) causes him to start falling in lust or something (?!?!?!?!), so he kills the maiden and then himself. Reader is left to mop up the chunks of brain that have shot out her nose. :P
Dumbledore's Commentary: Nothing too offensive so far...mostly seems that Dumbledore's commenting on how disturbing the tale is, and an anecdote of Beatrix Bloxam being traumatized by the story as a kid, which pretty much started off her...crusade, so to speak (and even though I know I'm not supposed to like her, that story just makes me smile, because it's one of those rare instances real life seems to seep in. *Pets her and gives her warm milk* :) Which sums up most of Rowling's so-called "unlikeable" characters, IMHO). Preaching on about "the power of love", blah blah blah...look, Dumbles, if it weren't for the way the Power of Love was presented in the books, I'd probably find your interpretation pretty credible.
Ironically, it's one of those moments when I welcome the commentary, if only because the story was really, really confusing. Which absolutely kills me.
Dumbles Rage-O-Meter: 5. In tolerable range. And if *that's* normal range...yeah, be very afraid. :P
So yeah...this is probably the point THE TALES OF BEEDLE THE BARD starts to go a little wacky. Be very afraid. :P
Kyoshi Warrior gear, don't fail me now...
Summary Of The Story: Guy doesn't want to fall in love -- because he kind of thinks that falling in love is for pussies. :P -- so he seals his heart away in a distant room. Fair maiden arrives to help him out. Guy's hairy heart (?!) causes him to start falling in lust or something (?!?!?!?!), so he kills the maiden and then himself. Reader is left to mop up the chunks of brain that have shot out her nose. :P
Dumbledore's Commentary: Nothing too offensive so far...mostly seems that Dumbledore's commenting on how disturbing the tale is, and an anecdote of Beatrix Bloxam being traumatized by the story as a kid, which pretty much started off her...crusade, so to speak (and even though I know I'm not supposed to like her, that story just makes me smile, because it's one of those rare instances real life seems to seep in. *Pets her and gives her warm milk* :) Which sums up most of Rowling's so-called "unlikeable" characters, IMHO). Preaching on about "the power of love", blah blah blah...look, Dumbles, if it weren't for the way the Power of Love was presented in the books, I'd probably find your interpretation pretty credible.
Ironically, it's one of those moments when I welcome the commentary, if only because the story was really, really confusing. Which absolutely kills me.
Dumbles Rage-O-Meter: 5. In tolerable range. And if *that's* normal range...yeah, be very afraid. :P
So yeah...this is probably the point THE TALES OF BEEDLE THE BARD starts to go a little wacky. Be very afraid. :P
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 03:13 am (UTC)The classical witch, on the other hand, with her often malevolent interest in the small beer of human affairs, is everything we fear only too well that we would in fact become. ... the witches will perform their evil, bad-tempered spells.
Like Merope Gaunt. Can't let the women have magic!
In his discourse about witches with warts and bad magic Pratchett conveniently omitted to cover Glinda the Good Witch of the ... North? From the Oz books.
Maybe Narnia's White Witch cancelled her out.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 06:27 am (UTC)One thing that puzzles me in that Pratchett piece is that he concludes that the fictional wizard is what we'd want to be and the fictional witch is what we're afraid to be - and that therefore "The sex of the magic practitioner doesn't really enter into it." Did we flip a coin? Why don't we have the lady wizard we want to be and the grubby man-witch we're afraid to be as standard tropes? I don't know the answer, but I don't think we need to rule gender out as a possible factor just because we found another possible factor; they aren't mutually exclusive. The few historical "wizards" I know about, like John Dee, worked for royalty - he advised Elizabeth I about astrology, among other things. So it isn't like there wasn't a real(ish) precedent for the fictional discrepancy. He even has a white beard according to his portrait.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 06:43 am (UTC)Galadriel is a great example of a she-wizard. If I recall correctly, whereas the other two bearers of the three Rings of Power were male - Elrond and Gandalf? - I think hers, Nenya, was 'the most powerful of the three', something like that. And the Wikipedia tells me that she was "the mightiest and fairest of all the Elves that remained in Middle-earth".
You know, if Pratchett is tallying the gender of magic users maybe he should have included all of the 'dark lords' strewn across the literary landscape. There's a reason why they're called dark lords, and not ladies, after all. Morgoth, Sauron, Grindelwald and Voldemort, anyone?
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 08:44 am (UTC)More sexism at work, I think - a witch is not only per definition evil, but she's a petty sort of evil, using her magic to do small, mean things and (at most) to try to steal some man's power base since she's incapable of building one herself. For proper evil-overlording, you need a wizard gone bad.
There are exceptions to that too, of course. The White Witch of Narnia, and the Green Lady after her, were full-feathered evil overlords (okay, so the Green Lady's plans to take over Narnia did involve corrupting a powerful man, but she ruled her own subterranean empire by virtue of her own badassness alone). And while the witches of Oz, good and wicked alike, looks like they are inferior to the Wizard at first, in the end it turns out that he's a fake whereas their power is real. Still, the tendency is there.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-20 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 07:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-19 08:36 am (UTC)