Head Boy an' Girl
May. 19th, 2011 02:39 pmNow, yer mum an’ dad were as good a witch an’ wizard as I ever knew. Head boy an’ girl at Hogwarts in their day!--PS chapt. 4 Many of us have questioned how James (and, to a lesser extent, Lily) could have been head boy, given everything we've been told about his behavior as a teenager. But I'm wondering... are we absolutely certain that he actually was head boy?
It occurred to me this morning that the only mention of James and Lily as having been head boy and girl in the entire series is Hagrid's statement above, which he makes soon after delivering Harry his Hogwarts letter. We are told multiple times in multiple books that Tom, Bill, and Percy were all head boys, but it is never once stated again that James and Lily were head boy and girl, not even when the trio is looking through an old list of head boys in chapter 13 of CoS.
We know that Hagrid is not the most reliable source of information. Just a few hours later, he will tell Harry, "There’s not a single witch or wizard who went bad who wasn’t in Slytherin," completely glossing over the fact that man who betrayed Harry's family was a Gryffindor. When he declares that James and Lily were head boy and girl, he is in the midst of countering Petunia's claims that they were strange and abnormal freaks who got themselves blown up. Could he be lying here... or, umm, exaggerating the truth a bit? (They weren't really head boy and girl, but they should've been, given how totally awesome they were).
After all, it is Hagrid's assigned duty to make sure that Harry agrees to go to Hogwarts and follows in his parents' footsteps... including, eventually, the whole getting themselves blown up part.
Re: The Potter fortune, plugging the plothole
Date: 2011-05-21 03:22 am (UTC)Probably true. But if she manages the money well, her children will never have to work.
Re: The Potter fortune, plugging the plothole
Date: 2011-05-21 09:35 pm (UTC)Which reminds me--the thing I found most annoying about that interview Oprah did with her last year was the sight of these two billionaires commiserating with each other about how hard it was to *sob* get used to the idea that *boo hoo* they'd never have to worry about money again! Doesn't your heard just bleed for them?
Let me be clear: I don't begrudge either JKR or Oprah their wealth and success. They've both worked hard for what they have, and they earned their money honestly in our capitalist system. What I do object to is their acting like being fabulously wealthy is some kind of burden. That comes particularly ill when millions of people are losing everything they own and can't even find a job because of the worldwide financial collapse that isn't their fault, and that they can't do anything to fix.
Re: The Potter fortune, plugging the plothole
Date: 2011-05-26 02:05 am (UTC)Wow... that's sickening in so many ways, isn't it? Poor, poor billionaires. As an impoverished grad student that kind of thing makes me want to give these people a good slap.
Re: The Potter fortune, plugging the plothole
Date: 2011-05-31 03:05 am (UTC)One of the reasons I'm a fan of Trent Reznor is because he acknowledges the impact luck had on his success. In an interview in 1994 he said, "Sometimes I want to complain about how hard it is to be rich and famous, but I have to stop myself because it's such bullshit. I know how lucky I am to have gotten a record deal. I know how lucky I am to have had a platinum album." Now that is a rich, famous person I can respect for his integrity and honesty.
Re: The Potter fortune, plugging the plothole
Date: 2011-05-31 03:16 pm (UTC)Of course, I have always been annoyed by Oprah- she seems very condescending and has a weird sort of sentimentalism that I can't quite put my finger on. Oh, and apparently she had a whole show a few years back on how to harass salespeople into giving you a discount. As a former Macy's sales associate, I do not approve, and neither did my coworkers who told me about it. I wonder if she does that at whatever ridiculously overpriced stores she shops at? ;-)