Well, well, lookie here....

[sweettalkeress.livejournal.com]

I was perusing TwilightSucks awhile ago, and came across this little gem, detailing why Bella Swan is a good match for Draco Malfoy. You can read the madness below:

http://twilight-sucks.livejournal.com/1584746.html

I nearly burst out laughing when I read the line: "Draco doesn't want friends. He wants fans and henchmen. Harry didn't fawn over him, and so their enmity was born." Seriously, that describes Harry more than anything!

And actually, no, Rowling would not write the story about Eric or Mike or whoever. Chances are, Eric and Mike would still be nobodies, just like Dean and Seamus. Harry is no everyman, after all- he's a self-absorbed jerkass Gary Stu just like Edward and Bella- he just hides it better!

Seriously, every so often someone will critique Twilight and immediately follow it up with "But Harry Potter is sooooo much better!" Newsflash: Just because it's better than Twilight... doesn't mean it's good!

Comments

[oneandthetruth.livejournal.com]

My take on Potter versus Twilight: both are disgustingly crappy books written by sick individuals. Meyers has creepy ideas about relationships and women and Rowlings wrote the Potter books as narcissistic wank-material.

I feel sorry for the trees that died to print these monstrosities.

LOL! Thanks for the laugh! You say some of the funniest things. :D

Then there are Laurie R. King's books, which can be described in all these ways. They win major awards, too, which can't be said for HP and Twilight.