Lynn_waterfall, in an exchange we were having below in the spork of GoF 36, assumed that Fudge thought that Harry had said, back at the end of book one, that Voldemort was dead but somehow not completely dead.
But what Harry actually knew was that Voldemort, riding the back of Quirrell's head, said that he was, "Mere shadow and vapor... I have form only when I can share another's body... but there have have always been those willing to let me into their hearts and minds.... Unicorn blood has strengthened me, these past weeks... and once I have the Elixir of Life, I will be able to create a body of my own."
Now, we readers, being logical, might infer that the once-a-normal-living-human Voldemort, who is now "shadow and vapor... [without] a body of [his] own" might be legally classed as "dead but not as gone as we might wish."
A) Did Harry ever work that out? and
B) Did he ever communicate that to others? To anyone?
WE all know that Harry faced a dead Voldemort possessing his living servant Quirrell in an attempt to secure the Philosopher's Stone and kill Harry.
And we know that everyone in Hogwarts (and therefore, all their relatives at the Ministry) know that SOMETHING happened down there. See the congratulatory sweets by Harry's bedside.
But as oryx points out, in OotP only Neville seemed quite sure that the incident involved "the Sorcerous Stone".
What was "known" by the rest of the WW?
The only facts we know Twinkles probably could not have hidden were: Quirrell's death (or at least disappearance), and the destruction/disappearance of the Philosopher's Stone, leading eventually to the Flamel's deaths of old age.
Does everyone/anyone but US even know these two incidents were connected? That Quirrel died in attempting to steal the Stone? And is it generally known that Quirrell was the Dark Lord's agent in that attempt (Severus's alibi to Bellatrix--which presumably is the same as he gave Riddle--was that Snape had never known that), much less physically possessed by him?
And among those who know that Quirrell was physically possessed--would they have any reason to assume that the Dark Lord had been discorporate himself when he took Quirrel over?
Tom had previously possessed animals/humans while retaining control of his own body--was this known?
Final question: when Tommy abandoned Quirinus's dying body, did Quirrell's head restore itself to normal? Or did Albus show everyone a corpse with Lord V on the back or his head?
But what Harry actually knew was that Voldemort, riding the back of Quirrell's head, said that he was, "Mere shadow and vapor... I have form only when I can share another's body... but there have have always been those willing to let me into their hearts and minds.... Unicorn blood has strengthened me, these past weeks... and once I have the Elixir of Life, I will be able to create a body of my own."
Now, we readers, being logical, might infer that the once-a-normal-living-human Voldemort, who is now "shadow and vapor... [without] a body of [his] own" might be legally classed as "dead but not as gone as we might wish."
A) Did Harry ever work that out? and
B) Did he ever communicate that to others? To anyone?
WE all know that Harry faced a dead Voldemort possessing his living servant Quirrell in an attempt to secure the Philosopher's Stone and kill Harry.
And we know that everyone in Hogwarts (and therefore, all their relatives at the Ministry) know that SOMETHING happened down there. See the congratulatory sweets by Harry's bedside.
But as oryx points out, in OotP only Neville seemed quite sure that the incident involved "the Sorcerous Stone".
What was "known" by the rest of the WW?
The only facts we know Twinkles probably could not have hidden were: Quirrell's death (or at least disappearance), and the destruction/disappearance of the Philosopher's Stone, leading eventually to the Flamel's deaths of old age.
Does everyone/anyone but US even know these two incidents were connected? That Quirrel died in attempting to steal the Stone? And is it generally known that Quirrell was the Dark Lord's agent in that attempt (Severus's alibi to Bellatrix--which presumably is the same as he gave Riddle--was that Snape had never known that), much less physically possessed by him?
And among those who know that Quirrell was physically possessed--would they have any reason to assume that the Dark Lord had been discorporate himself when he took Quirrel over?
Tom had previously possessed animals/humans while retaining control of his own body--was this known?
Final question: when Tommy abandoned Quirinus's dying body, did Quirrell's head restore itself to normal? Or did Albus show everyone a corpse with Lord V on the back or his head?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 05:55 pm (UTC)For what it's worth, I wrote him as older and not really aware of others, more of an airy intellectual. (Also, wasn't Severus supposed to be really young for a teacher?)
The entry says Quirrell was "turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort." How does this even work, and how many did he create all told?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 09:15 pm (UTC)I can't recall if this is fanon or suggested by the books, but my understanding was that Quirrell was younger than Severus by a few years, but was at Hogwarts by the time of SWM.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-15 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-15 03:06 am (UTC)Hmmm. He works all day and likes to press wildflowers. I wonder if he also skips, jumps, and likes to dress in women's clothing and hang around in bars? :D
no subject
Date: 2011-09-15 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 06:00 pm (UTC)Quirrell trying to find Voldemort to defeat him once and for all to prove himself I could probably see, but wanting to learn magic from him? When he supposedly still believed in evil and so probably thought Voldemort was an evil person doing evil magic? There's better ways to learn advanced magic to impress people, so I'm not sold on that (unless someone can come up with a convincing explanation). From what he says it sounds like he was NOT looking for power with no regard for morality (at least, not in the sense of learning special Voldemortian dark magic - more like "fame and influence" instead) when he went to Albania, since he had to "learn" Voldemort's viewpoint.
Very unsatisfactory Flamel entry. If you're going to fill in some details for readers, why not at least hint at important things like "what was Flamel doing for the whole 20th century?"
no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 06:19 pm (UTC)Going to look for Voldemort to learn magic would indeed be an odd thing for someone who believes in good and evil to do (sort of like looking for Hitler to get tips on running a country, if such a thing were still possible) -- *if* he knew that it were Voldemort. But if whatever rumours he'd heard just mentioned a strange and powerful spirit in the forest, without indicating its real identity, then it's possible that an intellectually curious person eager to become more powerful might go and seek it out.
(On a side note, there seems to be a surprising amount happening in Albania is these books. Helena originally fled there a thousand years ago, IIRC, her diadem was hidden there, and Tom stayed there while he was incorporeal. Any idea what's up with that?)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-12 07:18 pm (UTC)Re Quirrell: I can see an emotionally-detached but intellectually-hungry moth attracted to a Dark flame. What I don't get is the implication that Quirrell is quite young, when I thought she said in an interview that he was the Muggle Studies teacher before he took time off to go to a part of Europe that's viewed as a joke or dark or whatever Albanophobic stereotype some Europeans want to use.
Re Flamel: Wow, it must be nice to have millions of people with whom one can share wholly irrelevant dreams. :-)
These notes are probably going to drive me nuts, like the interviews did. At least Rowling's consistent about vulnerable young men directing their ambition into being "important" and mistakenly hitching their stars to the biggest bully of them all -- it seems to be a thing for her.
As for the original post about what the Wizarding World knew, I'm sure Dumbledore kept as much of the truth to himself as possible, so Harry could grow and test his strength, you know. Congratulatory sweets, though -- that seems in poor taste.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-15 03:09 am (UTC)I know. It's so sad how James, Sirius, and Remus turned out.
What do you mean that's not what you meant? ; )
no subject
Date: 2011-09-15 04:59 pm (UTC)In PS Harry sees Quirrell, but not Severus, as young looking. That's what canon has to say about his age. Also, it is canon he taught *something* before going on his journey. In 1991 Severus was 31. Even if we assume that under 'normal' conditions teachers were at least 24 when hired (so as not to have to teach anyone who knew them as students) Quirrell could have had time to teach a few years, go on his journey and still be younger than Severus.
A big question is how long did Albus have those mysterious 'sources' that reported to him where Tom was lurking. Because if they predate Quirrell's travels then they must have reported to him that Tom had moved from his hiding place in 1991.