[identity profile] danajsparks.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] deathtocapslock
In my opinion, Harry is a character who can be written convincingly as gay, straight, or bisexual. I've noticed, however, that I tend to dislike fan fiction that features Harry in a heterosexual pairing. For a long time, I believed that this was simply because I just generally prefer to read slash romance stories. But after reading several Severus/Hermione fics that I thought were absolutely wonderful, I decided to take a closer look at my distaste for straight!Harry fics.*

I realized that my aversion to these stories has less to do with Harry being in a het pairing and more to do with how these stories tend to treat certain other important characters. More specifically, I really dislike how Ron, Draco, and Severus are treated in many of these stories.

Ron is usually quickly discarded as a friend because he is too much of a whiny, jealous prat and too slavishly devoted to Dumbledore. "Ron bashing" is often even specified in the summaries of these stories. Draco is often flattened into a totally irredeemable wannabe death eater. His harassment of Harry is generally far more vicious than anything he ever does in the books. Severus is regularly turned into a verifiably dreadful teacher (there are records proving low test scores, extreme Slytherin bias, high injury rates, etc.) who is usually either still secretly loyal to Voldemort or unquestioningly obedient to an evil!Dumbledore. Regardless of his current allegiances, he deserves to die.

Certainly not all straight!Harry authors (mis)treat Ron, Draco, and Severus in these ways, and there is certainly character bashing in other types of HP fics. Nevertheless, I do not think I'm completely imagining a correlation between straight!Harry and such negative characterizations of these three men.

So why is the character bashing of Ron, Draco, and Severus so especially predominant in straight!Harry fics? It could be simply because the authors of such stories have been influenced by each other's writing. But the fact that the three characters are so often reviled in the same stories that emphasize Harry being in a heterosexual relationship(s) leads me to speculate that it might have something to do with attitudes about male sexuality.

Ron, Draco, and Severus are all rather submissive men. And many people are uncomfortable with the idea of a submissive man because they associate submissiveness with femininity. Severus and Draco are, additionally, both very sensitive men, and sensitivity is another character trait that is strongly associated with femininity. And, of course, feminine equals WEAK, and weakness in men is BAD.

Interestingly, Harry also has some "feminine" traits. He is definitely less sensitive than Severus or Draco, but he sometimes comes across as very submissive in canon. So, really, it isn't all that surprising that the same authors who so despise Ron, Draco, and Severus also make a great deal of effort to make Harry more "manly." For instance, canon Harry is pretty inept when it comes to dating girls, but straight!Harry easily gets himself a girlfriend--sometimes two or more girlfriends---proving his sexual prowess. Straight!Harry becomes independent!Harry, rejecting most offers of aid and mentorship from the adults in his life, because, after all, it's good for men to be self-reliant. Straight!Harry also becomes powerful!Harry, because men should be strong and powerful. In these stories, Dumbledore is often portrayed as manipulative or evil, not so much because of his callousness towards others in general, but because of how he treats Harry in particular; Dumbledore has been manipulating Harry all his life because Harry threatens his position as top dog in the wizarding world. In other words, Harry isn't naturally so submissive. No, if Dumbledore would just stop interfering, then Harry would become the most dominant wizard of all!


As a side note: Many straight!Harry fics also have a fair amount of Molly Weasley bashing, perhaps because those who are uncomfortable with submissive men are also uncomfortable with dominant women.


*To be clear, I'm referring mainly to fics where Harry's relationship with a girl (or sometimes multiple girls) is a major part of the story, not stories where Harry happens to get a girlfriend along the way.

Date: 2011-11-15 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harpsi-fizz.livejournal.com
Fans that aren't well rounded are very guilty of this kinda crap, and it makes me just insane. Ron gets designated to being the bad guy in most fics. The reason I won't read Harry/Draco (aside from the gratuitous amounts of R/Hr in them) is because they always make Ron into The Homophobe Ignoramus.

I guess what you're teaching me is that it's universal. Ron gets used by everyone as a convenient prop. The opposition in everything.

I'm guessing that in these stories, the girlfriend isn't an OFC- is she? 'Cause if she is, my guess is to immediately write them off as Step-on-me meyer syndrome of taking a crush and upping his manly!ness for the Self insert OFC.

Date: 2011-11-16 01:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harpsi-fizz.livejournal.com
he's also clearly heterosexual, at least more so than most of the other male characters in the series.

Oooh. You accidentally got close to a big nerve point of mine. Could you explain what you mean by that? I don't want to assume anything or fly off of the handle when you Prrrrobably didn't mean that the way it looks at first glance.

Date: 2011-11-16 03:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harpsi-fizz.livejournal.com
Relief. I knew that asking for clarification would make everything better. Everything you said is the truth and could certainly lead to someone thinking "Ron is displaying a lot of Heterosexuality in those moments". Of course, everything is in Harry's P.O.V, so we wouldn't get to notice him imagining the looks of males.

I hope I didn't give you a mini-heart attack. Please let me explain. On a thread in FictionAlley Park, right in the slash section (http://forums.fictionalley.org/park/showthread.php?s=97356ab536ca1801b02947fea86d10c1&threadid=91258&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=1), I've heard people say that Ron is way too boyish to be gay. The sentiments are sprinkled here and in the previous thread. As a slasher, I'm sure you know how infuriating that statement is, not to mention sexist, homophobic, and... well. So that's where I'm coming from personally. Particularly from Darth_Gojira, there's a lot of "Gay is not just about love, but an entire personality" sentiment. I didn't mean to imply that you were one of those narrow minded people. I was asking for clarification to confirm and quiet my own automatic response.

Me, I have a little stock pile of "Ron is ambiguous" arguments. Viktor Krum worship and the talk of him being majestic on the broom. The way Ron's complaints about girls don't have much substance. The fuss he put up with about taking that one girl to the dance because "uh... her nose is crooked. Yeah. That's why." Biology, too! Ron, being the youngest male in the family- look at the studies showing how the more males a woman has, the more likely the younger ones will be gay.

Of course, some of those "Ron is never ever possibly gay" people are just jerks and you can't reason with them, can only troll them. To troll the mean people, there's troll statistics. Seven Weasley Kids + 2 Parents + Harry = 10. If one in ten people are gay... :3 (Or you can split it and say "then two in ten are bisexual", too,).

And one might note Ron's supposed "crushes" (Rosmerta, Fleur) are all on older women. Even Hermione is one year older than everyone in her class. So it wouldn't be much of a stretch to imagine him falling for, say, the pretty blonde older Lucius Malfoy (God, I love that ship...)

Date: 2011-11-16 03:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadefell.livejournal.com
"I've heard people say that Ron is way too boyish to be gay."

Well, yes, of course, because gay men are all exactly alike with exactly the same traits. Just like straight men! *vomits everywhere*

Date: 2011-11-17 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
Especially since the exact way in which your sexual orientation reflects your personality is subject to cultural change, just like everything else. For instance, there was a time when fashionable or feminine men would have been considered almost rabidly heterosexual, rather than camp gay as they often are now. So it's not even a stereotype that everyone's always agreed with!

Date: 2011-11-17 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
"Especially since the exact way in which your sexual orientation reflects your personality..."

Sorry, bad wording. I meant the idea thereof.

Date: 2011-11-16 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
"Me, I have a little stock pile of "Ron is ambiguous" arguments. Viktor Krum worship and the talk of him being majestic on the broom. The way Ron's complaints about girls don't have much substance. The fuss he put up with about taking that one girl to the dance because "uh... her nose is crooked. Yeah. That's why.""

Well... maybe he is bisexual. Maybe he likes men but is still closer to the low end of the Kinsey Scale (see Wikipedia, et al.) than Harry is. Sexuality, after all, is fluid.

one in ten, two in ten

Date: 2011-11-18 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com
But Charlie's clearly gay (why else is he unmarried, off cavorting in Romania [about as far as he can get from Molly's expectations] with other--as far as we can see--all-male dragon handlers?), so that's the one, and Harry's obviously bi, so that's the two!

I've seen the occasional good Ron/Severus story, but mostly... Ron as gay doen't hit my vibes. I've seen a lot more Severus / Bill, Charlie, or Percy that totally resonated with canon, but Ron is a far shot. (I've also read some hot Harry/Bill and Harry/Charlie stories--and a few Harry/Twins, always plural.)


As to your arguments--they're not illogical, but they don't, to me, have much meat.

I mean, for a Quidditch hag to fangirl an international Quidditch star--how many teen boys do hero-worship some star or another of their sport of choice? Only sometimes is this sublimated homeeroticism. The sense I get was more is that Ron wanted to BE Victor, not to screw him. (Not that one can't sometimes want both, or feel that the one might provide the other....)

But that might be just me.

Tell me--is it really that you think canon!Ron IS gay, or might be, or just that you dislike people to assume that he MUST be straight (presumably because that's the default position for everyone in literary canon, especially kiddie!lit canon, and THAT assumption is not fair?)



Date: 2011-11-16 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aikaterini.livejournal.com
/The reason I won't read Harry/Draco (aside from the gratuitous amounts of R/Hr in them) is because they always make Ron into The Homophobe Ignoramus./

True, but I've noticed that a lot of Harry/Draco fanfics (H/D doujinshi in particular) portray Draco as very weak and submissive to the point of outright portraying him as the uke stereotype. Which is why I found it interesting that danny_sparks said that Straight!Harry is often made more "manly" in some fanfics, when he also often cast as the seme stereotype in a lot of H/D fanfiction and doujinshi (sometimes to the point of becoming a blatant sexual predator *shudders*).

Date: 2011-11-17 12:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
Ugh, the uke/seme dichotomy. Everytime I come across that relationship it makes me genuinely uncomfortable. For one thing, I'm pretty sure (admittedly I'm no gay man, but even so) that that's not how gay relationships work, or any healthy relationships at all for that matter. It always feels to me like a recreation of sexist gender binaries that exist between offensively stereotypical straight couples in porn or whatever, but transposing the weak, helpless, timid qualities onto a feminine man instead of a woman.

Now I'm reminded of a porno I put on the Weepingcock community awhile back. The story was stupid, nonsensical, OOC and possibly glorified abuse at a low level, but the most interesting thing about it was that the "top" was a man about as feminine as the "bottom," and in most of the same ways too. So much so that people started discussing it in the comments.

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 07:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios