[identity profile] dracasadiablo.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] deathtocapslock
Just unlocked all new Chamber of Secrets "Exclusive Content".

The term 'pure-blood' refers to a family or individual without Muggle (non-magic) blood. The concept is generally associated with Salazar Slytherin, one of the four founders of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, whose aversion to teaching anybody of Muggle parentage eventually led to a breach with his three fellow founders, and his resignation from the school.

Slytherin's discrimination on the basis of parentage was considered an unusual and misguided view by the majority of wizards at the time. Contemporary literature suggests that Muggle-borns were not only accepted, but often considered to be particularly gifted. They went by the affectionate name of 'Magbobs' (there has been much debate about the origin of the term, but it seems most likely to be that in such a case, magic 'bobbed up' out of nowhere).

Magical opinion underwent something of a shift after the International Statute of Secrecy became effective in 1692, when the magical community went into voluntary hiding following persecution by Muggles. This was a traumatic time for witches and wizards, and marriages with Muggles dropped to their lowest level ever known, mainly because of fears that intermarriage would lead inevitably to discovery, and, consequently, to a serious infraction of wizarding law.*

Under such conditions of uncertainty, fear and resentment, the pure-blood doctrine began to gain followers. As a general rule, those who adopted it were also those who had most strenuously opposed the International Statute of Secrecy, advocating instead outright war on the Muggles. Increasing numbers of wizards now preached that marriage with a Muggle did not merely risk a possible breach of the new Statute, but that it was shameful, unnatural and would lead to 'contamination' of magical blood.**

As Muggle/wizard marriage had been common for centuries, those now self-describing as pure-bloods were unlikely to have any higher proportion of wizarding ancestors than those who did not. To call oneself a pure-blood was more accurately a declaration of political or social intent ('I will not marry a Muggle and I consider Muggle/wizard marriage reprehensible') than a statement of biological fact.

Several works of dubious scholarship, published around the early eighteenth century and drawing partly on the writings of Salazar Slytherin himself, make reference to supposed indicators of pure-blood status, aside from the family tree. The most commonly cited signs were: onset of magical ability before the age of three, early (before aged seven) prowess on a broomstick, dislike or fear of pigs and those who tend them (the pig is often considered a particularly non-magical animal and is notoriously difficult to charm), resistance to common childhood illnesses, outstanding physical attractiveness and an aversion to Muggles observable even in the pure-blood baby, which supposedly shows signs of fear and disgust in their presence.

Successive studies produced by the Department of Mysteries have proven that these supposed hallmarks of pure-blood status have no basis in fact. Nevertheless, many pure-bloods continue to cite them as evidence of their own higher status within the wizarding community.

In the early 1930s, a 'Pure-Blood Directory' was published anonymously in Britain, which listed the twenty-eight truly pure-blood families, as judged by the unknown authority who had written the book***, with 'the aim of helping such families maintain the purity of their bloodlines'. The so-called 'Sacred Twenty-Eight' comprised the families of:

Abbott
Avery
Black
Bulstrode
Burke
Carrow
Crouch
Fawley
Flint
Gaunt
Greengrass
Lestrange
Longbottom
Macmillan
Malfoy
Nott
Ollivander
Parkinson
Prewett
Rosier
Rowle
Selwyn
Shacklebolt
Shafiq
Slughorn
Travers
Weasley
Yaxley

A minority of these families publicly deplored their inclusion on the list, declaring that their ancestors certainly included Muggles, a fact of which they were not ashamed. Most vocally indignant was the numerous Weasley family, which, in spite of its connections with almost every old wizarding family in Britain, was proud of its ancestral ties to many interesting Muggles. Their protests earned these families the opprobrium of advocates of the pure-blood doctrine, and the epithet 'blood traitor'. Meanwhile, a larger number of families were protesting that they were not on the pure-blood list.

* Over subsequent decades and centuries, the number of mixed marriages began to climb again until the healthy levels of today, and this has not led to widespread discovery of the hidden magical community. Professor Mordicus Egg, author of The Philosophy of the Mundane: Why the Muggles Prefer Not to Know, points out that Muggles in love generally do not betray their husbands or wives, and Muggles who fall out of love are jeered at by their own community when they assert that their estranged partner is a witch or wizard.

** In fact, the reverse appears to be true. Where families adhered consistently to the practice of marrying within a very small group of fellow witches and wizards, mental and physical instability and weakness seems to result.

*** Widely believed to be Cantankerus Nott.


"Magbobs" is a affectionate name?
Is sounds just as ridiculous and mocking as Muggles to me.

Pigs? Of all possible animals she had to pick pigs?

Members of Weasley family were "most vocally indignant"? I can't remember them claiming that they are related to "many interesting Muggles" anywhere in the books.
We heard about "accountant-we-don't-speak-about" but that's it.


The name 'poltergeist' is German in origin, and roughly translates as 'noisy ghost', although it is not, strictly speaking, a ghost at all. The poltergeist is an invisible entity that moves objects, slams doors and creates other audible, kinetic disturbances. It has been reported in many cultures and there is a strong association with the places where young people, especially adolescents, are living. Explanations for the phenomenon vary all the way from supernatural to scientific.

It was inevitable that, in a building bursting with teenage witches and wizards, a poltergeist would be generated; it was likewise to be expected that such a poltergeist would be noisier, more destructive and harder to expel than those that occasionally frequent Muggle houses. Sure enough, Peeves is the most notorious and troublesome poltergeist in British history. Unlike the overwhelming majority of his colleagues, Peeves has a physical form, though he is able to become invisible at will. His looks reflect his nature, which those who know him would agree is a seamless blend of humour and malice.

Peeves is well-named, for he has been a pet peeve of every Hogwarts caretaker from Hankerton Humble (appointed by the four founders) onwards. Though many students and even teachers have a somewhat perverse fondness for Peeves (he undoubtedly adds a certain zest to school life), he is incurably disruptive, and it generally falls to the caretaker of the day to clean up his many deliberate messes: vases smashed, potions upended, bookcases toppled and so on. Those with weak nerves deplore Peeves' fondness for suddenly materialising an inch from the end of their noses, hiding in suits of armour or dropping solid objects on their heads as they move between classes.

Several concerted efforts to remove Peeves from the castle have resulted in failure. The last and most disastrous was made in 1876 by caretaker Rancorous Carpe, who devised an elaborate trap, baited with an assortment of weapons he believed would be irresistible to Peeves, and a vast enchanted bell jar, reinforced by various Containment Charms, which he intended to drop over the poltergeist once he was in place. Not only did Peeves break easily through the giant bell jar, showering an entire corridor with broken glass, he also escaped the trap armed with several cutlasses, crossbows, a blunderbuss and a miniature cannon. The castle was evacuated while Peeves amused himself by firing randomly out of the windows and threatening all and sundry with death. A three-day standoff was ended when the Headmistress of the day, Eupraxia Mole, agreed to sign a contract allowing Peeves additional privileges, such as a once-weekly swim in the boys' toilets on the ground floor, first refusal on stale bread from the kitchen for throwing purposes, and a new hat – to be custom-made by Madame Bonhabille of Paris. Rancorous Carpe took early retirement for health reasons, and no subsequent attempt has ever been made to rid the castle of its most ill-disciplined inhabitant.

Peeves does recognise authority of a sort. Though generally unimpressed by titles and badges, he is generally amenable to the strictures of the teachers, agreeing to stay out of their classrooms while they teach. He has also been known to show an affinity for rare students (notably Fred and George Weasley), and is certainly afraid of the ghost of Slytherin, the Bloody Baron.


So, Peeves is not a ghost of a dead wizard but more like a twisted genius loci of Hogwarts?
Now when I think about it it makes a lot of sense.
He's a perfect mirror of chaos, bullying and "amusing" pranks that are rampant at Hogwarts.


Hogwarts is the most heavily haunted dwelling place in Britain (and this is against stiff competition, as there are more reported ghost sightings/sensings on these damp islands than anywhere else in the world). The castle is a congenial place for ghosts, because the living inhabitants treat their dead friends with tolerance and even affection, no matter how many times they have heard the same old reminiscences.

Each of the four Hogwarts houses has its own ghost. Slytherin boasts the Bloody Baron, who is covered in silver bloodstains. The least talkative of the house ghosts is the Grey Lady, who is long-haired and beautiful.

Hufflepuff house is haunted by the Fat Friar, who was executed because senior churchmen grew suspicious of his ability to cure the pox merely by poking peasants with a stick, and his ill-advised habit of pulling rabbits out of the communion cup. Though a genial character in general, the Fat Friar still resents the fact that he was never made a cardinal.

Gryffindor house is home to Nearly Headless Nick, who in life was Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington. Something of a snob, and a less accomplished wizard than he believed, Sir Nicholas lounged around the court of Henry VII in life, until his foolish attempt to beautify a lady-in-waiting by magic caused the unfortunate woman to sprout tusks. Sir Nicholas was stripped of his wand and inexpertly executed, leaving his head hanging off by a single flap of skin and sinew. He retains a feeling of inadequacy with regard to truly headless ghosts.

Another notable Hogwarts ghost is Moaning Myrtle, who haunts an unpopular girls' toilet. Myrtle was a student at Hogwarts when she died, and she chose to return to school in perpetuity, with the short-term aim of haunting her arch-rival and bully, Olive Hornby. As the decades have rolled by, Myrtle has made a name for herself as the most miserable ghost in school, usually to be found lurking inside one of the toilets and filling the tiled space with her moans and howls.


Fat Friar was a miracle worker, stand up comedian, magician and would be cardinal?!
And Nearly Headless Nick was would be beautician / plastic surgeon?
Just how are house ghost chosen? And who picked them?


Draco Malfoy grew up as an only child at Malfoy Manor, the magnificent mansion in Wiltshire which had been in his family’s possession for many centuries. From the time when he could talk, it was made clear to him that he was triply special: firstly as a wizard, secondly as a pure-blood, and thirdly as a member of the Malfoy family.

Draco was raised in an atmosphere of regret that the Dark Lord had not succeeded in taking command of the wizarding community, although he was prudently reminded that such sentiments ought not to be expressed outside the small circle of the family and their close friends ‘or Daddy might get into trouble’. In childhood, Draco associated mainly with the pure-blood children of his father’s ex-Death Eater cronies, and therefore arrived at Hogwarts with a small gang of friends already made, including Theodore Nott and Vincent Crabbe.

Like every other child of Harry Potter’s age, Draco heard stories of the Boy Who Lived through his youth. Many different theories had been in circulation for years as to how Harry survived what should have been a lethal attack, and one of the most persistent was that Harry himself was a great Dark wizard. The fact that he had been removed from the wizarding community seemed (to wishful thinkers) to support this view, and Draco’s father, wily Lucius Malfoy, was one of those who subscribed most eagerly to the theory. It was comforting to think that he, Lucius, might be in for a second chance of world domination, should this Potter boy prove to be another, and greater, pure-blood champion. It was, therefore, in the knowledge that he was doing nothing of which his father would disapprove, and in the hope that he might be able to relay some interesting news home, that Draco Malfoy offered Harry Potter his hand when he realised who he was on the Hogwarts Express. Harry’s refusal of Draco’s friendly overtures, and the fact that he had already formed allegiance to Ron Weasley, whose family is anathema to the Malfoys, turns Malfoy against him at once. Draco realised, correctly, that the wild hopes of the ex-Death Eaters – that Harry Potter was another, and better, Voldemort – are completely unfounded, and their mutual enmity is assured from that point.

Draco’s feelings for Harry were always based, in a great part, on envy. Though he never sought fame, Harry was unquestionably the most talked-about and admired person at school, and this naturally jarred with a boy who had been brought up to believe that he occupied an almost royal position within the wizarding community. What was more, Harry was most talented at flying, the one skill at which Malfoy had been confident he would outshine all the other first-years. The fact that the Potions master, Snape, had a soft spot for Malfoy, and despised Harry, was only slight compensation.

Date: 2012-09-21 06:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lynn-waterfall.livejournal.com
One interesting idea I don't think I'd thought of, before, based on the rumors about Harry being a potential Dark Lord. Harry wasn't just a possible option because he'd (apparently) demonstrated considerable power...

...he'd specifically demonstrated more power than their previous, vicious master, and Harry would most definitely not be allying himself with him. Harry isn't just a chance at "world domination," or a replacement -- he's a chance at protecting Voldemort's former followers from a returned Voldemort.

Terri? Please say I've inspired some fic? ;)

Date: 2012-09-21 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mary-j-59.livejournal.com
Well, I think it's an awesome idea! Seconding the request for more fic from Terri (but I want more of both "Unlikely Allies" and "Headmaster Snape", so I'll be patient.)

Date: 2012-09-21 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melaniedavidson.livejournal.com
I'm just surprised that people, grown adults, apparently thought it was something that Harry himself did, and also that if it was it might mean he'd be a dark lord. I mean, he was ONE YEAR OLD! You'd think the speculation would be more along the lines of his parents finding some powerful magic to protect him. And even if they did think it was accidental magic on his part (manifesting pretty early, too, I guess!), how could he possibly be a dark wizard at that age? As a baby, barely even able to communicate or understand things around him, he was already evil somehow?

Date: 2012-09-21 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
"As a baby, barely even able to communicate or understand things around him, he was already evil somehow?"

To be fair, that's pretty much how we're supposed to understand Voldemort. So I guess it does follow logically, in a way, from the determinism in this series.

Date: 2012-09-21 11:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melaniedavidson.livejournal.com
His followers didn't know that, though--or, I assume not, with his past being a big secret and all. Maybe HPverse has a history of evil babies...?

Date: 2012-09-22 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lynn-waterfall.livejournal.com
Ick. That would also turn the fact that Harry did nothing, and that his mother's sacrifice protected him, into another one of those passivity-is-good things.

Not that I expect different behavior from a one-year-old, obviously, it's just another thing in that pattern.

Date: 2012-09-21 11:54 pm (UTC)
sunnyskywalker: Young Beru Lars from Attack of the Clones; text "Sunnyskywalker" (Uhura)
From: [personal profile] sunnyskywalker
I know! The only halfway plausible version I can think of is that they thought he had some sort of inherent aptitude for dark magic (which he instinctively used in self-defense) and an inherent distaste for Muggles because they're icky and give off icky vibes, like reptiles* or something I guess, which was apparently another of their beliefs (weird, but not as hard to swallow as a baby with a defined ideology). And so they thought he'd naturally grow up to be like them, only more powerful.

This still doesn't explain why Harry deciding that pureblooded but ideologically suspect Ron Weasley seemed nice after a few hours on the train made them think Harry was a lost cause as a dark lord, however. There wouldn't be any ick-factor for his hypothetical sensitive anti-Muggle feelings to react against, so surely they could chalk it up as a case of ignorance and naivety, in their view? Ask Draco to try harder to make up to him (and do try to sound less aggressive toward his misguided Weasley brat friend for the moment, son, until poor untutored orphan Harry starts to understand our ways, because sometimes you have to suck it up and hold your tongue for the cause; remember that we are trying to be cunning here) - they got off on the wrong foot, he's sorry if he said anything to offend, how can he help Harry settle in, oh your Muggle relatives were terrible how very interesting and you have my deepest sympathies for being stuck with them, etc. etc. If Harry was too set against Draco, you'd expect to see other Slytherin parents telling their kids to try setting themselves up as alternative friends - we're the nice ones, Harry, come hang with us! Here's some belated birthday presents Dubmledore wouldn't let us send you for the last 10 years to thank you for being so amazing and carrying on your father's honorable name and all that!

I'm not saying this would work, mind, but why didn't they try? If they give up so easily, you have to wonder how the DEs ever managed to get scary at all. (Oh no, guys, the Minister said good wizards should oppose us! Shut down the whole movement!) The point where they gave up on Dark Lord Harry ought to have been when Harry started hanging out with Hermione, not when he made friends with Ron.


*Not that I have anything against reptiles personally, but an instinctive "eek, a reptile!" response seems pretty common.

Date: 2012-09-23 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melaniedavidson.livejournal.com
I think it must have been something along the lines of... they didn't strongly believe he was a super-powerful dark wizard who was going to be Voldemort 2.0 and were just sort of hoping. And then Draco has his run-in with him and sees that he's just some kid and he's already friends with Weasley and he was rude and didn't even want to be friends and then he got sorted into Gryffindor, probably a lost cause. Draco at least is not exactly a cunning diplomat, either, especially with his wounded pride to think of (and his father not actually there making him behave). It is weird that no Slytherin students tried to approach him, though. Maybe house rivalries are just that strong? Even without buying into the "next dark lord for some reason" idea you'd think there'd be some who'd see some advantage there.

Date: 2012-09-22 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Well, one doesn't necessarily have to conflate dark magic with evil. Various theorists - including terri, Jodel, etc. - have looked carefully at the books and come to the conclusion that dark magic doesn't have to be inherently evil for the series to hold up (and that popular confusion between dark wizards and lawbreakers is plenty to explain the reactions of the Gryff-type characters that gave us the idea it was evil magic). If Jodel is right and dark merely equals wild magic rather than systematized wizardry, accidental magic could fall under it and "dark lord" might translate to nothing more than "exceptionally powerful wizard with an inborn talent for non-wizarding forms of magic." Which, is a status baby Harry could fit. (That's how I always read it, in fact, not "this is baby Wizard!Stalin!")

Date: 2012-09-22 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
I attribute the rumors to Severus and Albus acting in the background. With the intent of protecting Harry from the remaining DEs.

Date: 2012-09-22 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
Do you think Lucius had given up on this line of thought by the time he released the diary or only when Harry accused him of doing so at the end of COS?

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2026 04:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios