[personal profile] oryx_leucoryx posting in [community profile] deathtocapslock
I looked up the spoilers site and found there is more detailed information about The Malfoys. Enjoy!

Date: 2012-09-23 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
It really is starting to sound like a broken record at this point, isn't it? "This character is good in the main Harry Potter storyline; therefore his family has always been good. This character is evil (or at least mean to Harry) in the main Harry Potter storyline; therefore his family has always been evil."

I feel like that thing about all traits going through the father is a tired cliche in its own right. "Only men carry power, prestige, or talent in their bloodlines; women are just insignificant vessels for the next generation." I wonder, then, if there's a deeper philosophical meaning behind the notion that Harry looks almost exactly like his father, except that he's got eyes the same color as his mother's.

So yeah, it's just more tired cliches which have been discredited in multiple works and which Rowling should feel bad for so blithely adhering to.

Date: 2012-09-24 02:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aikaterini.livejournal.com
/I feel like that thing about all traits going through the father is a tired cliche in its own right. "Only men carry power, prestige, or talent in their bloodlines; women are just insignificant vessels for the next generation."/

That’s a very interesting point. It kind of goes along with a trend that I’ve noticed in fiction, which is that female characters are rarely mentors and role models, especially not for male protagonists. If a boy is trying to emulate someone, it’s usually his father or a father figure. Harry has James and Dumbledore, Draco has Lucius, etc. And even with female protagonists, it’s often the father who’s taught the heroine her skills, whose death changes her for life, and so on.

Date: 2012-09-24 04:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
That's true and I feel like it's been noted by several different bloggers and amateur critics over several different situations. The relative invisibility of mothers and other female family members of the protagonist in most media is one reason why I love the "Code Geass" subplots involving Lelouch's mother and sister. In the case of male protagonists I feel as though it could go along with the notion that people find it "emasculating" for men to emulate women in any way shape or form--which in and of itself has sexist connotations (though it'd be completely in character for Harry Potter, since all the most powerful women are evil or in the background).

So, where exactly does Lily, Harry's mother, fall into all this? Because she's consistently held up as more virtuous than James, and I think Dumbledore at one point mentions that Harry is more like his mother, and less like his father, than Snape may realize. And it's her death, not James's, that makes Harry protected against Voldemort (allegedly, anyway).

Date: 2012-09-24 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hwyla.livejournal.com
So, the entire series seems to be based upon children inheriting their father's characteristics and morals and yet it is supposedly wrong for Snape to think Harry is a mini-James?

Not that I am saying Snape would be right for thinking that - but if JKR is going to have generations of families exactly the same as the previous generations, then why should Snape not think so?

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2026 07:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios