I know everyone say, “Dem two short planks, dey’re as fick as [Terri]” Terry Pratchett, Jingo
Well, at least, they should be saying that.
What, from Snape’s point of view, was the point of volunteering to referee Harry’s second Quidditch game?
Severus did not really imagine that he could better protect Harry from Quirrell on a broom flying through the sky with his attention necessarily divided among fourteen children and two lethal missiles (oh, and a game), than with both feet planted on the ground and his attention all on Harry and Quirrell, no. Only a Gryffindor with visions of heroically (and idiotically) interposing his body between the intended victim and a spell would come up with such an idea.
Besides, Snape’s attempted protection was rendered utterly superfluous by Dumbledore’s unexpected appearance on the scene.
So I had applied Luna’s maxim for figuring out the schemes of the smartest Slytherins: sometimes you must at least consider the possibility that what did happen is what they meant to happen.
Applied to Snape’s refereeing, that gave me Quirrell’s assessment:
“Why do you think he wanted to referee your next match? He was trying to make sure I didn’t do it again. Funny, really… he needn’t have bothered. I couldn’t do anything with Dumbledore watching. All the other teachers thought Snape was trying to stop Gryffindor from winning, he did make himself unpopular….”[PS17]
So I deduced, and thought myself bright to do so, that the real point of the exercise had been to firm up Snape’s reputation with the other teachers of being frothing-at-the-mouth unfair where James Potter’s Quidditch-playing lookalike son was concerned.
Bangs head slowly against dem two short planks I are as fick as.
That result was lagniappe.
The point was Quirrell’s “Funny, really….”
Establishing that Quirrell—and Voldemort—bought that Snape and Dumbledore had been working at cross-purposes in protecting Harry.
Rather than, say, closely together.
*
What, after all, had been Snape’s supposed reason for protecting Harry?
Well, what did Severus say when Bellatrix challenged him on that point?
“Have you not understood me? It was only Dumbledore’s protection that was keeping me out of Azkaban! Do you disagree that murdering his favorite student might have turned him against me? … I have done my utmost to have him[Potter] thrown out of Hogwarts, where I believe he scarcely belongs, but kill him, or allow him to be killed in front of me? I would have been a fool to risk it with Dumbledore close at hand.” [HBP 2, emphasis mine]
Snape’s fabled animosity towards Harry is itself his excuse for working hard to protect the child. If anything happened to the boy, he’d be the obvious first suspect. Perfectly valid, absolutely self-interested reason to take a keen interest in the boy’s safety at school—I’ll take the fall if anything happens.
Including with Dumbledore. Dumbledore doesn’t really trust Snape with the boy. Dumbledore believes Snape capable of murdering James Potter’s son. Ergo, Snape dare not. And dare not even stand by when someone else tries.
And the two of them established this as soon as they could manage after Severus tipped. Voldemort’s agent off that he was protecting Harry.
Dumbledore must have been suspicious of Snape’s story that he’d been performing a countercurse at the first match, right? Why else would he show up to keep an eye on the ref? Which incidentally kept the real assassin in check as well.
Funny, really.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 02:25 pm (UTC)Terri believes that Dumbledore and Severus want Quirrellmort to think that, while Severus is actually protecting Harry (to repay the debt to James allegedly), Dumbledore is suspicious of Severus, so that Severus can use that suspicion later as an excuse for not harming Harry at Hogwarts. Therefore, Severus needs to do something which is a very visible act of protection (refereeing rather than just being in the crowd in case) so that Dumbledore can equally obviously over-ride this by coming to the match himself.
It's just occurred to me that Tom was in the Hogwarts staff room for nearly a year under that turban, yet doesn't seem to have used the opportunity to put anyone under Imperious, or to gain any useful information on staff loyalties, family etc.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 03:03 pm (UTC)This actually supports my view that Quirrell wasn't a very willing agent of Tom's. I think Tom (especially in his weakened state in PS) needed all his energy to control Quirrell (and use what little was left to curse Harry's broom and other short term efforts).
no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 11:15 pm (UTC)I understand about wanting to make Dumbledore look suspicious of Severus. That's a really good idea that makes sense. I just don't understand why that's strengthened by Severus being in the air instead of on the ground, when it seems that would make it harder to be protective, not easier. Unless being able to get closer to the target, instead of the source, would help somehow?
(IIRC Severus wasn't a natural flier, either, and seemed uncomfortable on the broom. Or am I just projecting there?)
So I wondered if they were trying to sell that Severus was trying to set himself up an excuse for failure, which was stymied by Dumbledore turning up himself. Pulling strings to get the ref job could even have been sold as what made Dumbledore suspicious.
From Quirrellmort's words, though, he does seem to buy that Severus was the ref in order to strengthen, not weaken, his protection.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-31 01:49 am (UTC)As for Snape comfort level on a broom, it is difficult to tell. The game is extremely short and while he spits when it is over, it is also just after Harry almost ran him down. The only other time we see Snape on a broom is during the 7 Potters chase in DH. While he is not specifically mentioned as inept, he does have difficulty with his aim, ending up slicing off a Weasley ear while also stopping a DE from AKing Remus. That doesn't necessarily mean he isn't good on a broom. After all, Remus is not AK'd, so he did accomplish what he wanted. It's possible that it would have been the same result on the ground.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-31 09:47 am (UTC)I think it's not so much that he's going to be in the air, which does make protection harder, unless Hwyla's idea is correct, but the fact that it draws Quirrellmort's attention to the protectiveness, If Severus just attended the match and kept an eye on Harry, the protection aspect wouldn't be obvious. By creating a stir in the staffroom, and then being very visible up on the broom, Severus is sending a very deliberate message. Therefore, Dumbledore coming along to the match is intended to make it equally obvious that Severus is not trusted.
So I wondered if they were trying to sell that Severus was trying to set himself up an excuse for failure
That would be a good idea, but I think is stymied by Severus' earlier words in the forest, and as you say, Quirrelmort does seem to know that Severus was being protective.
As to the broom, as well as the 7 Potters and the match, there's the memory Harry sees of the boy and the bucking broom and Lupin's comment that Severus was jealous of James' Quiddich skills. Although that's obviously misleading, it wouldn't have worked if Severus was himself a good player. Severus also learns to fly unaided. So all in all, I think we're meant to get the impression that he's not a natural on a broom.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-31 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-01 12:10 am (UTC)There is nothing to indicate that Lily continued 'flying' without a broom once she got to Hogwarts. I cannot imagine people believing it 'dark' for Voldy to fly unaided if they had been used to watching Lily do it throughout her Hogwarts career. But I can see Snape inventing it based on his memories of her, especially after a reminder that even a spectacular flier (Harry) can find himself in the air with either a malfunctioning/cursed broom or none at all.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-01 12:12 am (UTC)