Pottermore stuff
Nov. 30th, 2013 12:45 pmI looked up the spoilers site, and it looks like they took down all the direct quotes from Pottermore after having being warned about copyright infringement. I suggest we take care. Summarizing or retelling new content should be OK, but no direct quotes.
Also, looks like GOF stuff is up. Can anyone tell us if there are any tidbits?
Also, looks like GOF stuff is up. Can anyone tell us if there are any tidbits?
no subject
Date: 2013-12-18 05:19 am (UTC)If James had ever decided he needed help from Slughorn and his network, anyway. He probably didn't. But we're given to believe that Lily was generally well thought of by others as well, and so James might have found that "reforming" for his sixth and seventh years and dating Lily suddenly improved his reputation, since his own "popularity" didn't seem to involve more than three people actually liking him. The new positive attention had to have flattered his ego. Not a family connection, no, but definite social benefits. Add that to no pesky in-laws trying to stay for Christmas or give him advice or chastise him, and what a perfect setup!
The "Fullbloods" idea makes perfect sense, and fills an important gap in the WW. Molly sure speaks out strongly against Muggle things, from technology to medicine to things like walking around in their own train station in large numbers, but never says anything against Muggle-born Hermione except for the time she thinks Hermione's callously social climbing. Less willing to give Hermione the benefit of the doubt given her unfortunate upbringing, but not prejudiced against the girl in general. Even Draco might think less of Harry's mother, but doesn't go around saying Slytherin's monster will kill Harry for being impure, e.g.