In time for Halloween JKR gave us another short story (more background info to be honest, it's not like it has a plot). You can read it at Pottermore (if you have an account and can actually remember your user name and password) or you can read it here: J.K. Rowling writes Harry Potter Halloween tale profiling 'malicious' Dolores Umbridge
My personal take on this little story is that it's wholly pointless. It just repeats that Umbridge was always a nasty person with no depth to her and she's worse than blood purists. Nothing really new or insightful is revealed, nor do I believe did anybody care to know this sort of stuff about Umbridge. I also found it very unbelievable that anybody would buy her claims of being a pureblood, considering how small the wizarding community is. And of course she was a Slytherin, because where else could an evil person in HP have come from.
My personal take on this little story is that it's wholly pointless. It just repeats that Umbridge was always a nasty person with no depth to her and she's worse than blood purists. Nothing really new or insightful is revealed, nor do I believe did anybody care to know this sort of stuff about Umbridge. I also found it very unbelievable that anybody would buy her claims of being a pureblood, considering how small the wizarding community is. And of course she was a Slytherin, because where else could an evil person in HP have come from.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-01 10:30 am (UTC)Now she's just a stereotype, a person born bad, bred in Slytherin and completely noxious to the core.
And that's not scary.
Also, am I horrible if I think Umbridge would have been more frightening had she looked like Imelda Staunton in the books, a sweet granny figure who you wanted to like and was so nice and kind and motherly, until you saw the venom beneath the fluff? Because how does JKR's villains not know they are villains? If you went to the costume store and opened the box for villains, it would be their clothing!
The Ruddigore Effect
Date: 2014-11-01 11:04 am (UTC)Of course Gilbert was writing a satire on the cliches of old-fashioned melodramas (which were old-fashioned in the 1880s when he was writing). And he pointed the satire by having the good guys and bad guys switch places half-way through, adopting the appropriate names, costumes, and facial attractiveness. Though there is a lot of cartoonishness in JKR's writing, she loses any pretensions to genuine satire long before Umbridge makes her appearance.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-02 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-02 09:10 am (UTC)It also doesn't help that Snape is played by the incredible Alan Rickman who is closer to 60 than the 31 he was when he met Harry for the first time.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-04 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-02 07:12 pm (UTC)Now she's just a stereotype, a person born bad, bred in Slytherin and completely noxious to the core.
And that's not scary.
Yeah, if she was a guy, I would expect her to have a moustache to twirl. I'm surprised JKR didn't give Umbridge facial hair just to hammer home the point about how un-feminine she is.
Umbridge is less scary to me now
Date: 2014-11-02 09:05 pm (UTC)Re: Umbridge is less scary to me now
Date: 2014-11-05 05:18 am (UTC)