You're all familiar with the Draco in Leather Pants and Ron the Death Eater tropes, right?
After seeing the way some--not all--members of this comm treat Snape and Dumbledore, I'm seriously tempted to rename the tropes "Severus in Leather Pants" and "Albus the Death Eater."
I'm sorry if I've offended anyone, but I joined DTCL under the impression it was about analyzing the more problematic parts of the HP books, not about glorifying characters you like/bashing characters you don't like. It looks like I was wrong.
After seeing the way some--not all--members of this comm treat Snape and Dumbledore, I'm seriously tempted to rename the tropes "Severus in Leather Pants" and "Albus the Death Eater."
I'm sorry if I've offended anyone, but I joined DTCL under the impression it was about analyzing the more problematic parts of the HP books, not about glorifying characters you like/bashing characters you don't like. It looks like I was wrong.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-17 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-17 02:59 am (UTC)But yes, GoF year was an entire waste of time, with the entire class just dedicated to assisting Hagrid in his (illegal) experiment. And clearly dangerous.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-18 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-19 08:23 am (UTC)Hagrid has no intention of ceasing his campaign of intimidation, however. In conversation with a Daily Prophet reporter last month, he admitted breeding creatures he has dubbed "Blast-Ended Skrewts," highly dangerous crosses between manti-cores and fire-crabs. The creation of new breeds of magical creature is, of course, an activity usually closely observed by the Department for the Regulation and Control of Magical Creatures. Hagrid, however, considers himself to be above such petty restrictions.
"I was just having some fun," he says, before hastily changing the subject.
Thanks for pointing me at the place.
Given Rita's penchant for hyperbole and her negative attitude towards Hagrid I think we can assume from this that breeding magical creatures *isn't* illegal. Not from this quote anyway. 'Usually closely observed' doesn't equate to 'against the law'.
Although nx74defiant in another comment right after yours says there's a piece in 'Care of Magical Creatures' - maybe she means 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them? - which says it's outright illegal?
no subject
Date: 2017-01-19 12:45 am (UTC)It is in Care of Magical creatures with a "handwritten" note: did any tell Hagrid?
no subject
Date: 2017-01-19 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-19 08:24 am (UTC)Do you mean the 'charity' book 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them'? I never read that book, or 'Quidditch Through the Ages'.
for_diddled thought that Rita's article in GoF stated that cross-breeding was illegal but it didn't quite go that far IMO.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-20 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-21 09:27 pm (UTC)I had it in a boxed set with 'Quidditch Through the Ages'.
The gimmick was that the Beast book was Harry's "actual book". So you had the text book with notes written by Harry and Ron. I think it was Ron (or it could have been Harry) wrote the note about did Hagrid know.
Hagrid, however, considers himself to be above such petty restrictions
After all Hagrid is a Gryffindor. And it is ok if a Gryffindor does it.