The DADA Curse
Dec. 2nd, 2017 06:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sunnyskywalker posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
deathtocapslockI’ve been re-reading some meta, and there are enough interesting bits and pieces about the DADA curse that I wanted to wrap it all up into one post. Most of this is not new; it’s just a synthesis of disconnected comments.
Red Hen in “His Heart Belongs to DADA?” notes,
And yet, the curse itself does not seem to show any signs of serving Lord Voldemort’s interests. Quite the opposite, if anything. It almost seems to be calibrated to do its greatest damage to those who are the greatest threat to Hogwarts. It was the agents which Voldemort had placed there himself (apart from Snape) who were the ones most deeply “bitten” by it.I mean, look at that track record during Harry’s time in the school.
Year 1 & Year 4: the DADA instructor was Voldemort and/or one of his agents. The result? Death and worse.
Year 2 & Year 5: The DADA instructor was an unaffiliated outsider. Result? Both were “hoist on their own petard.” Both brought to grief through the defects of their own characters. Mental, emotional, or physical damage of varying degree.
Year 3 & Year 6: The DADA instructor was one of Dumbledore’s agents. Result? Exposure, loss of reputation. Both driven from the school, without permanent or long-lasting injury. They both still had any problems that they brought with them, but they took no significant (additional) physical or mental damage, whatsoever. That’s hardly the way you would expect the curse to go if it were Lord Voldemort driving it.
It really isn’t, is it?
So. Maybe Voldemort didn’t create the curse from scratch. (One might expect a powerful curse to take more than a simple covert wand movement, after all, but then again, who can say with the inconsistent Potterverse magic.) Maybe he twisted some pre-existing magic of Hogwarts, and didn’t do a perfect job of it.
We know Hogwarts has protective enchantments. What might some of the less obvious ones be? Let’s look at what directly preceded each DADA instructor’s exit from the school, shall we?
Year 1: Quirrellmort tries to kill a student and is killed.
Year 2: Lockhart tries to Obliviate two students and is instead himself Obliviated.
Year 3: Lupin unintentionally puts students in danger by transforming and is revealed and ejected.
Year 4: Crouch Jr. is about to kill a student and is drained of his soul.
Year 5: Umbridge plans to torture students and is herself tortured.
Year 6: Snape kills the Headmaster at the Headmaster’s request and is only temporarily ejected from the school, having no apparent difficulties returning two months later.
Year 7: Amycus Carrow tortures students (and orders them to torture each other) and is himself tortured (by Harry).
I’m thinking there’s some sort of “don’t seriously harm students or faculty, especially not on purpose” magic at work here. Maybe it always operates at a lower, less damaging level (allowing Hagrid to have students tend his blast-ended skrewts and McGonagall to leave Neville in the hall with a murderer on the loose with no obvious repercussions), only invoking if a teacher actually kills a student. Or maybe it’s latent, waiting to be triggered by the Headmaster in special circumstances. In which case it might be that only Dumbledore’s allowing Tom access to the Headmaster’s office gave Tom the opportunity to activate and/or alter the enchantment. (No wonder he starts holding interviews off-campus!)
Swythyv hinted at this possibility in “Pipes” (archived version available here).
“No one can bide there who plays false to the peace and safety of Hogwarts - and that defense was set long before Tom Riddle was a gleam in Merope Gaunt's eye.”
If the curse/protection always active, what Voldemort did was crank the sensitivity up to eleven (for DADA teachers only). He went to Hogwarts; he knows how, erm, flexible the definition of “harm” can be there. Just about any teacher might accidentally endanger students a bit, or intend to cause at least minor harm, at some point. So if you fiddle the dials on the enchantment, as it were, so that it triggers at a much lower level of “harm” by DADA teachers, you’ll catch most of the DADA teachers.
Well, okay, he must also have magically busted something so no one can dial the setting back down again (or turn it off).
As to how he cranked up the dial for DADA teachers only, that might take some thinking. If it’s tied to the position, why not formally abolish it and replace it with a similar position with a different title? Swythyv thought that perhaps the quarters, rather than the position as such, were jinxed. Which might work, if the quarters assigned to the various departments don’t change for decades at a time or longer. Each suite of rooms designated for a particular position might have been added separately to the “don’t maim or kill students” enchantment as the castle expanded over the years, leaving them able to be dialed up or down individually.
My main problem with this is that if the Headmaster knows about these protective enchantments (which he ought to), and that they’re tied to the professors’ quarters, why doesn’t he just move all DADA-related activity to different rooms? There seem to be plenty of empty rooms and classrooms about (though maybe that’s only because we mainly see or hear about “empty” rooms after hours). So we’re in much the same position as if it’s tied to the position.
Red Hen says the curse “seems to consist of the fairly devilish trick of focusing the [Dark] energies that the instructor of the class is forced to invoke in order to teach his students a defense from, and turning them against the instructor.” Well, Quirrell died going up against Lily’s blood protection (ancient magic, possibly dark?) but didn’t himself channel it. Though maybe possession and/or drinking unicorn blood would have done the trick. Lockhart got blasted by Obliviate (possibly dark, but not publicly advertised as such since Secrecy relies on it so heavily). Lupin was disgraced after being outed as a dark creature. Crouch Jr. and Amycus used Unforgivables, and Snape used one (AK). Umbridge only planned to use Cruciatus. So I’m not sure how well this works either.
Especially since we’re also told that all curses are dark magic, and I sincerely doubt that no professor in another position has ever cast a fair number of minor curses in a year. We don’t see any of them ever suffer even the kind of minor rebound you might expect if the enchantment were working on them at a lower setting. (I think. Any possible examples?) And if the Animagus transformation is dark, McGonagall especially ought to have suffered some minor magical bad luck.
The whole thing would also work a lot more smoothly if Dumbledore’s one off-hand comment about not being able to keep a DADA teacher longer than a year might be him speaking carelessly (as discussed in a previous DTCL thread). Maybe a few teachers lasted a year and a half! That would cut down on how many passed through the revolving DADA door a bit.
And since presumably most of them endangered students through carelessness rather than actively intending to torture or kill them, most of them would have left under circumstances more like Lupin’s: inconvenient, perhaps shameful, but not permanently damaging or fatal. This could explain why no one (except Dumbledore) is 100% certain that there is a curse at work.
So, there you have it: the DADA curse, courtesy of pre-existing Hogwarts enchantments. Still missing the details of how Tom fiddled the magical dials for one position only, and why Dumbledore can’t just turn the sensitivity of the enchantment back down. Any ideas?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
miscellaneous
Date: 2017-12-06 07:25 am (UTC)An interesting tidbit of a thought: if there has always, or for a long time, been a general geas against teachers using Dark curses to punish students, that would explain Argus's beloved whips and chains. I mean, why the heck would a wizarding school have used any such things, ever? Unless BOTH a very old-fashioned idea that discipline and/or punishment required physical torment prevailed, AND the obvious magical means of inflicting such torment were prohibited.
Also, putting a curse on a specific position which amounts to ramping up the sensitivity of the "don't harm students" geas might be difficult for a random outsider to do during a brief visit to the headmaster's office. But what if someone had an accomplice on the Board of Governors and/or at the Ministry, who took a hand in preparing the parchment for employment contracts? We know from Miss Granger's exploits with the D. A. that a magical contract will enforce itself even if a signatory didn't realize exactly what consequences they were inviting when s/he signed....
As to Dumbles... Well, one possibility is that he COULD have voided the curse, if he'd ever recognized the true source. But if he'd imagined that Tom had cast something original and creative during the interview and THAT was the origin of the curse, he might not have done anything so mundane as to bother to check the contracts mousy Miss Dovelock prepared year after year for the new DADA hire....
Yes, I know; then Tom should have been able to interdict the curse in a given year for a protégé. And Tom might have intended it that way originally. But he might have set up a self-replicating bureaucracy that was hard to stop--one way, after all, of doing the trick would have been with stooges automatically using the stock of special parchment for the DADA contracts.
But further; suppose he had worked through a knowing accomplice--years 1-4, Tom would not have been in a position to demand a year's cessation of the curse had he wanted. Year 5, he wouldn't have cared. Year 6 is the only one Tom might have been both able and willing to lift the curse--and Severus's fate was sealed, by Dumbles, BEFORE Severus was offered the cursed position....
Really, we need only posit that said accomplice might have had his own reasons to continue undermining Albus throughout Tom's absence, and I think we're home free....
Another possibility regarding Dumbles, of course, is that he did recognize the source of the curse and chose not to intervene. Either out of supineness, out of a sense that anyone WILLING to traffic so much with Dark Magic as to teach DADA deserved to be hoist on his own petard, or because Tom was blackmailing him (see earlier conspiracy theories I've presented about Tom and Albus's true relationship).
Thanks for an interesting post!
Re: miscellaneous
Date: 2017-12-06 04:25 pm (UTC)It is entirely possible that normal teachers contracts already had some wording regarding student safety and the contract for DADA teachers was the only one that was spelled, or that all contracts were magical but the one for DADA teachers had a subtle difference.
Re: Umbridge - yes, she did torture students with the quill, but that alone did not immediately trigger the curse.
Also, I wonder how this meshes with the idea that the curse became more extreme when Harry, with his Voldie-soul-bit arrived at Hogwarts (as an explanation for how come only in Harry's years the students started suspecting the DADA position was in fact cursed).
Re: miscellaneous
Date: 2017-12-06 08:06 pm (UTC)I think the Quill is a traditional "sign-in-blood" contract tool which Umbridge has perverted to her own ends. Probably dark, but maybe it not being a torture tool as such gave her a little cushion? "Moody" didn't get immediately walloped for transfiguring Draco either. Though we don't know whether that particular spell is dark or not. (Can it be darkish?)
If the teachers' contracts are somehow generated in the castle (on a desk next to the auto-generated Hogwarts admission letters, maybe) rather than at the Ministry or wherever the Board's offices are, and Tom did fiddle it himself, maybe Voldie-soul could still strengthen it by proximity?
First year would have been especially tough, since there were two bits of Voldie-soul in the castle. Poor Quirrell.
Re: miscellaneous
Date: 2017-12-06 07:59 pm (UTC)Do teachers ever use any magic against students other than healing or otherwise protective magic, like slowing Harry's fall during that Quidditch match? Besides Moody, I mean. Does the magic distinguish between "cursing kids to hurt/punish them" and "cursing kids for teaching demonstrations," and that's why Dumbledore thought it would be okay in class? (Oops.)
Good point about the Blood Quill as well. I suspect Umbridge is misusing an archaic but legitimate tool of contractual magic (I mean, signing in blood is something even we Muggles have heard of, so it's got to be old). But that doesn't mean it isn't dark. In fact, contractual magic like the Unbreakable Vow, Hermione's parchment, and signing in blood just scream dark magic.
An accomplice on the Board of Governors or Ministry cursing the contracts is an interesting idea! And if there's an auto-generate function for those the way there is for Hogwarts admission letters, he might have only needed his accomplice to muck with the spell once, which would simplify things considerably. His accomplice might not even work there anymore, so they really can't lift it.
If the "don't hurt students" spell is extremely old, it's also possible that no one has given it a really detailed study in centuries. They just tell new hires not to magic the students, the end. We know Tom likes studying old magic.