Date: 2007-09-19 03:58 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (I'll just watch from up here)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
Possibly. The person seems absolutely furious at him for saying Rowling was "apparently" Calvinist when she's Episcopalian. (Which I believe she would call "Church of England...?")

Date: 2007-09-19 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artystone.livejournal.com
Oh yeah, that's definitely F_W material. I've been reading mike-smith's DH recaps but not the comments, where's this little exchange happening?

Date: 2007-09-19 05:08 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Straw Man)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
It's in the latest entry--if you look for the exchange where there's a bunch of anonymous comments, those are them.

Here's a direct link:

http://mike-smith.livejournal.com/159608.html?thread=1366904#t1366904

In the entry before that there's a long shipping conversation--I went through all of canon without really getting into any shipping debates, and now it seems like I'm kind of in one without meaning to be.

Church of Scotland =/= Church of England

Date: 2007-09-19 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cressida0201.livejournal.com
She's not Episcopalian. Episcopalians are the American branch of the Church of England. JKR grew up in the Church of Scotland. One might be forgiven for thinking that was the Scottish branch of the Church of England, but it isn't. I looked it up as part of a recent discussion (I think it was on your LJ, actually!), and they are definitely Calvinist. The Church of England doesn't believe in predestination; the Church of Scotland does.

Re: Church of Scotland =/= Church of England

Date: 2007-09-19 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cressida0201.livejournal.com
Also, I see the indignant mouse is claiming that JKR isn't actually a member of the Church of Scotland. But a quick Google search turned up quite a lot of sites, including the HP Lexicon, who say that she is a member (see the "Church of Scotland" entry here (http://www.hp-lexicon.org/muggle/encyc/muggle-c.html), for example).

Re: Church of Scotland =/= Church of England

Date: 2007-09-19 05:28 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Pope Magpie)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
I'm not sure if you're disagreeing with me or the anon guy--what you're saying here is what I meant. I thought that the anon person was claiming that JKR was "Episcopalian" and it seemed to me that if she were that she would call it "Church of England" and not Episcopalian, because Episcopalian is, as you say, American. So just claiming she was that sounded wrong right off.

I didn't know what she'd actually grown up as but I believe you--Church of Scotland. Anon seems to be wrong both ways.

Re: Church of Scotland =/= Church of England

Date: 2007-09-19 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cressida0201.livejournal.com
Oh, I'm disagreeing with the anonymouse. Sorry if I was unclear! (I've gone over to post on the thread linked.)

Date: 2007-09-20 10:29 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
In further news, his evidence seems to be the entry on her nndm entry, which lists her religion as "Anglican".

-- Dan Hemmens

Date: 2007-09-20 01:49 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (I'm listening.)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
It's one of the craziest threads I've ever seen on Mike's lj. Having read your original essay and enjoyed it, I didn't remember the point being to prove Rowling's religion one way or the other. It was just looking at what seemed to be going on in the story and Calvinism coming to mind as a good way of describing it. Since I did find myself literally thinking of certain characters as "the damned" and "the Elect" by the end of the book, it was a comparison that worked for me!

Date: 2007-09-20 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellecain.livejournal.com
LOL, I love how the mouse in question is going "She's not a Calvinist so there! That automatically makes your analysis redundant," while Dan Hemmens never said she was, and simply theorised that it might have been an unconscious influence for the pre-determination notion in the HP series.

Way to miss the point, anonymouse!

Also, isn't it normal to look at an author's envioronment/cultural context to analyse their literary work? I mean if she was Shakespeare then a discussion of the culture of the times or their personal background is a valid form of analysing their work, right? I mean I don't know much about Lit. Theory, but I reckon that's an acceptable method... so I don't really see what Dan Hemmens would be doing wrong even if he did start off assuming she was a Calvinist. (Which he didn't, anyway...)

Date: 2007-09-20 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's more or less what I was getting at. Jim Smith wrote an interesting but I think ultimately point-missing rebuttal (since I think he too was assuming that I was trying to prove that JKR was a Calvinist, rather than - as you say - using Calvinist doctrine as an analogy for the way HP character seem to be either saved or damned from birth).

Enjoying your recaps, by the way.

Date: 2007-09-21 01:59 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Black and white)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
Thanks! Yeah, I understanding the position of saying that without God it can't be Calvinist. It just still very much feels like the same idea, only here the good are those favored by the author as heroes.

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 7th, 2026 10:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios