Uh...

Mar. 10th, 2017 01:24 pm
[identity profile] star-dragon5.livejournal.com
Even the god Set (or Seth) – a god of chaos, the dry lifeless desert, foreigners, and other things threatening to the Egyptian mindset, and usually falsely mischaracterized today as the “God of Evil” (nonsensical term) because of his role in the slaying of Osiris – was ultimately an upholder of ma’at. Indeed, it is his strength upon which the world’s continued existence depends: Set is the god who stands in the prow of Ra’s solar boat and slays the serpent every night. He is the one god, in fact, who is strong enough to do so, and his scepter is both his personal symbol and a symbol of strength in general. (Yes, I have strong feelings about Set. And another frequently misunderstood myth figure, the Norse god Loki, who I might or might not make reference to sometime later.)

~[livejournal.com profile] condwiramurs, "Indestructible - Part V - The Wheels of Heaven"

Will someone please explain to me what the hell ANY of the above has to do with Severus Snape?

Also, this:

You know, when you think about it, a very, very last-minute gamble by a dying man to undergo Merlin’s initiatory ordeal might have many motivations. As indeed might Tom’s usurpation of that cave.

Some of the legends about Merlin, after all, state that he vanished from the world of men because he was imprisoned through a woman’s wiles. Imprisoned, not killed.

Some legends say, further, that Merlin’s protégé was immortal. "Rex quondum, rexque futurum,"

The legends hint that there may be a fourth route to immortality. Not the Philosopher’s Stone, not the Hallows, not a Horcrux. A mystery known only to Merlin… and perhaps to be revealed to a successor proven worthy by passing the ordeal of the cave.


~[livejournal.com profile] terri_testing, "Albus and the Birdbath"

Nice theory. Too bad there's no evidence that the damn cave was ever anything but a cave. And as usual, terri turns it into an opportunity to bash Albus.
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
In poking around more while researching stuff for my coming discussion of Severus and Voldemort for Indestructible, I discovered a curious little fact that seems fitting.

In "Indestructible Intermezzo II - Etymological Excursus," I noted that:

"Our poison synonym, ‘toxic,’ on the other hand, derives ultimately from the Greek word for bow, toxon: the term toxicon pharmakon referred to the poison smeared on arrows, and was borrowed into Latin as toxicum, ‘poison.’ Meanwhile the probably-Scythian word for bow that entered Greek as toxon was also borrowed directly into Latin as taxus, the Latin word for ‘yew.’ A tree long associated with both death and resurrection, and from whose wood, of course, Voldemort got his wand."

And today, while researching the yew tree, I found an unexpected connection back to Severus.

All species of yew tree are known to contain varieties of a highly toxic class of alkaloids called taxanes. Every part of the tree other than the flesh of the red berry-like arils contains these toxins, including the seeds, wood, and leaves. Though the birds who eat the arils and spread the seeds are generally unable to break down the seeds and be affected by the poison, and larvae of a few species of moth and butterfly will eat yew foliage, to most animals consuming yew is fatally poisonous. Human beings consuming yew 'berries' without removing the seeds have died, and cattle and horses have been found dead near yew trees after trying to eat the leaves.

There does, however, seem to be an exception to this rule. Deer are able to break down the toxin, and so will eat the leaves of yew trees. Indeed, they graze so freely on yew that in the wild yew trees are commonly found only on steep slopes inaccessible to deer.

Apparently deer can eat death and live.

You can't make this stuff up.
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Indestructible Intermezzo II – Etymological Excursus

While preparing the next post with our other set of miscellaneous cards and thinking further about Severus, I started playing around with an etymological dictionary to see what hidden meanings I might uncover for the terms of our discussion. To see what sort of a resonant background layer I could piece together, if you will.

I found some interesting things.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
I've been writing up some of my thoughts on Voldemort and Severus, and it's made me realize how central flight is. Both to Severus' relationship to the Dark Lord, and to his character and arc in general. It all unfolded suddenly in my mind last night and became clear.

It's one of the hidden keys, an important one - like in Filius' challenge in PS/SS.

I know how it works - I'd figured out that part already (I'll explain when we get to Voldemort). And where Severus got the idea - that's obvious.

But I just figured out when and why Severus decided that he needed to work out the secret of unsupported flight.

Not for himself. That's not Severus' strongest motivator.

And not as a welcome-back present for the Dark Lord, although ironically he's the only one Severus ended up teaching the magic to.

For Harry.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
I'm working on writing up the other set of misc cards for my "Indestructible" series, and planning out the Severus-centric posts, where the real meat is. In those posts I'll be looking more at the books themselves again and quoting or referencing various chapters. There are sets of parallels and oppositions scattered throughout the books, and I'll be tracing some repeated imagery across them. So, for the sake of clarity and keeping things organized, I thought I'd give you a cheat-sheet of chapters and images to refer back to, if you want, as we go through the rest of the series.

This isn't a final list - I might end up finding further references as I write - but the major pieces are here.

Also, as I was pulling this list together I noticed an interesting bit of foreshadowing between POA and DH that I've pulled out for you at the end, to think about and play with.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
All right, as promised here are the remaining miscellaneous bits I need to cover along with our look at Severus himself. I’ve decided to fold the discussion of occlumency in here too, since it’s not that complicated to need a long post by itself.

However, for the sake of length, I’ll be posting this in sections. The first three cards in this set first, and the other three later.

In “Part VI – Dark Marks and Dark Arts,” we moved ahead in the alphabet from A for Albus and alchemy, to D for dark and death. Let’s continue skipping along the alphabet here and see what we’ve got.

This time:

F, for flight.

I, for immortality.

L, for love. (Can’t forget that.)

Next time:

O, for occlumency.

P, for purity.

T, for tower, with a side jump back to C for cave.

Then we can get back to our main subjects, S for Severus and V for Voldemort. And then I can finally go back to talking about moral arcs and that gravity assist thing I mentioned a while ago, and explain my two readings of the last books. Which I’m really eager to do after I get through all this stuff.

So, onward.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
So, I'm pulling together the concluding pieces of my "Indestructible" series, in order to lay out my two readings of Severus' arc in HBP and DH. And I'm not sure which one to finish up and post next - some of them are a bit like independent cards that can go in any order, though others need to stay together.

So I figured I'd toss the question out to all of you: which piece would you be most interested in seeing next?

The cards I have left to lay out are:

A - Occlumency - its nature and how Severus uses it (probably not a hugely long post)

B - Some assorted brief explorations of love, purity, and the Tower and Cave opposition, etc. (probably all in one post)

C - A three-card set that has to go up either in order or as one very long post (which will take a while to finish):

  1 - Severus' fundamental values and character, and how he ended up a DE

  2 - Severus' boggart

  3 - Severus and Voldemort

D - Our necessarily final card, tracing out the exact course of Severus' arc in my dual readings

Thanks for reading, and being so patient everyone! I hope this is interesting to you all.

[Poll #2019681]
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Just thought I'd note, for anyone who finds it confusing to keep up with all the pieces of this Indestructible meta series as they get posted, that I'm now also putting them up over at my own archive, Alchemical Fiction.

I've set it up there as a series, with the main essays under the story "Indestructible" and the post with optional references under "Food For Thought." The parts are all in order there.

You're welcome to read and comment wherever you like, and to become members of the archive if you want. (If you'd also be interested in posting your own fic or meta there, just drop me a note and I'll add you.)
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Indestructible – Part VI – Dark Marks and Dark Arts

Ok, let’s get back to talking about the books themselves for a bit, shall we?

We’ve talked about Albus, and alchemy, so perhaps we should skip ahead in the alphabet a bit and head on over to D. D for Dark; D for Death.

Dark Marks, Dark Arts, Dark Creatures, Dark Lords… Death, and Death Eaters.

Then we can get to occlumency and to Severus and Voldemort.

I should note at the outset that ‘dark’ is something of a fuzzy term to use when talking about moral and spiritual things and about that big ball of wibbly-wobbly vaguely-defined magical stuff we get in the Potterverse. In general, ‘dark’ should not necessarily be taken as a strict synonym for ‘evil’ – far from it. Darkness is natural and necessary and a part of life and it has great lessons to teach. Nor is ‘light’ the same as ‘good.’ Severus – our resident Dark Wizard – would be the first person to tell you that. For all that the HP books, and even Tolkien, like to conflate the two spectra.

But. Darkness does make it easy to do evil, because it allows one to hide. From others, and from oneself. Spiritual blindness, ignorance, forces that overwhelm one and prevent true sight or perspective… Things can be hidden to good ends or bad, and while sometimes we need to close our eyes, we also do need to open them again, as we see and see anew.

Right?

Ok. Onward.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Indestructible – Food for Thought

I mentioned that there were a lot of literary and pop culture and other references occurring to me as I work on this project, and that I’d put up a list in case anyone’s interested and wants to check them out while reading my blatherings, instead of mashing them all in to the essays. So, here you go. None of these are necessary to know for understanding the essays, they’re just…thematic enhancements.

I promise I’m getting close to my actual reading of the HP books themselves. Not much farther now.

I've added a few more things to this list, and a date so you can tell when it's been added to again.

Last updated: September 12, 2015.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
This is a long one, so I've broken it up into sections. There's an introductory section, section V.1 on the principle of Ma'at, section V.2 on the gravity assist, and a postscript.

There a HUGE amount I could have included here but didn't, for the sake of length, but I'll get to it at some point if I can. I promise it all eventually has to do with dear Severus, metaphorically at the least.

*

Indestructible V – The Wheels of Heaven

Circles.

Circles are fundamental. When you start looking for them, you can find circles everywhere. Literally, metaphorically, conceptually…everything sooner or later can be related to a circle. I think the circle might be the closest thing there is to a base form for the universe, a single fundamental truth from which to derive all others.

From the tiniest particles to cells, to the planet we live on and the movements of that body and all others in the cosmos, orbiting together, in everything we can find circles, seen from different angles, in different dimensions.

A point: a circle shrunk down to no dimensionality. A sphere: a circle expanded to three dimensions. Expansion and contraction. A spiral, and other such curves: a circle seen in motion through time. Even its seeming opposite – the straight line – is really a circle in disguise. According to the laws of perspective geometry, a line is just a circle taken to infinity. Our finite perspective of something infinite. And so, even things appearing to be made out of straight lines, like triangles and so on, can be understood as just the finite bit we can see of infinite things intersecting.

Circles are also paradoxical. Including while excluding, a symbol of all while – by – selecting and containing a small portion of the whole. Having no beginning, and so being endless.

Circles and lines also describe time, or our perspective on it rather. We have linear, ordinary time – shooting ahead of us, extending behind us, on and on. And we mythic time, circular repetitive time in which everything old is new again, the same things happen over and over, or are always happening at the same moment even, the same situations and stories and figures encountered again and again. Put them together and we get the spiral, progression (or regression) by returning again and again to the same place but from a new angle, in a new form. Reincarnation, history repeating itself, psychological integration, evolution, the paths described by every orbiting body in a solar system or galaxy…there are a thousand places to see this pattern.

You get the idea.

We have repetition, and repetition with difference. Static and dynamic forms of the same fundamental pattern, lower and higher incarnations of the same essence. Stillness and motion. Everything is both always the same, and always changing. Perspective is key.

So to give us a slightly different perspective on matters, permit me a brief excursion to that place the Weasley family chose as their vacation destination before I get back to work on the wheels here. That is to say, let’s go to Egypt for a moment.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Indestructible – Intermezzo

I have portions of a couple more bits of the series written out and ready to post, but in order for them to really make sense there’s other stuff that I think I need to lay out first. I’ve been thinking very hard about all of this and it’s ridiculously complex to put into words at moments, even leaving aside my latest revelation that, from a certain perspective, these books are all about Severus Snape and the alchemical process from start to finish – as seen through a glass darkly – through a Mirror – by someone who does not understand at all what she is writing, what Harry is seeing without comprehending.

But that’s a bit of a tangent from my original focus for this series, so I’ll leave that aside for the most part until I get through discussing my main topic, which is the nature of Severus Snape’s character and moral journey, particularly during the last years of the war.

But alchemy is a key symbolic language to remember here, to understand what I think it’s possible to read as happening in the deep background of these books, beyond Harry’s conscious awareness. Severus is an alchemist of some kind, whether figuratively or literally. And some of the images we got in that first book – the Philosopher’s Stone in the Mirror, the murdered unicorn giving half-life, Severus as the dark and confusing but demanding and knowledgeable teacher – are clues to remember.

And keep in mind that in every book we’re dealing with a return of echoes from the past in one form or another: in each book, Severus, like Harry, is confronting an echo of an earlier time, building on each other in waves. Particularly in regard to his relationship with Voldemort – the big piece of the puzzle we still have to explore to understand Sev’s journey here.

I’m also going to throw some other symbolic and metaphorical languages at you though (sorry, it’s just the way my brain works, figuring all of this out). In particular, I’m going to have to pull out a little geometry and a brief discussion of orbital mechanics. I’m finding pictures to illustrate – that’ll help make it clear, I think. I just find geometry and astrophysics to be very useful metaphors for talking about moral concepts and interactions, for some reason.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Part IV - Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Our first – and only overt – glimpse of an alchemist in canon came in the person of Nicholas Flamel, who flickered before our eyes together with his wife Perenelle in the first book, Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. They gave Albus the stone that was meant as bait to entrap Voldemort and his slave Quirrell, that Harry in trying to preserve from him nearly unwittingly gave to him, and that Albus says he's destroyed with the Flamels’ consent.

This Stone we saw openly: hard, crystalline, blood-red. Its fruits – gold, the elixir of life, the cure-all panacea – we did not directly see and had to infer, though one of them – the promise of life – was desperately desired and sought at any cost by Voldemort. That is, by the hollow husk of the boy Tom Riddle, nurtured in error and inflicted on everyone by Albus Dumbledore.

During that quest, in his childlike attempts to understand and solve the mystery and save people, the boy Harry Potter saw, in the forest at night, Voldemort, through his slave, keeping himself alive – in a terrible half-life – by feeding on the silver blood of a murdered unicorn. This was our first image of what Voldemort was capable of and willing to do in pursuing his particular brand of evil.

Keep this image in mind.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Albus was a man who in certain ways passed the greater part of his own moral struggle and burdens onto Severus Snape, among others. He used the man, ruthlessly, as a mirror and a tool to shield himself from himself, from the full weight of the consequences of his own actions and errors.

His handling of one Tom Riddle, and refusal to be direct about addressing the problem because it would reveal his own complicity in creating it; his conduct as headmaster of Hogwarts and handling of the abuse Severus, among others, received there; the vilification of a quarter of the student population and adulation of another quarter that he encouraged, feeding into the war machine two streams of child victims, to be used by Tom and himself; his refusal to fully acknowledge and own up to the real errors of his that led to his sister’s death and what he needed to do in response, and his shunting-off of the echo of that work onto Severus Snape; his handling of the prophecy matter and the lives of his subordinates, which led in part to the deaths for which he held only Severus Snape (the only truly repentant one) fully responsible; his handling of the child delivered into his care, Harry, and the curse that marked him…

In so many ways the greatest difficulties of Severus’ life were created or driven in large part by Albus Dumbledore, and yet in response Albus offloaded all of the moral work and heavy lifting onto him. Betraying him, repeatedly.

Ultimately unto death, if we are to go with the straightforward reading of canon. (Hey! No body, no portrait - Severus lives! If you like to so believe.)

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Having looked at the list of topics and ideas I still want to get to in my Indestructible series, and seen its length, I figured a masterpost of links to the parts in order might be nice to have. I'll add to this as pieces get posted.

Background stuff to read that might be useful, since I draw on the ideas implicitly in some essays, are terri's metas - especially Greater Love, her analysis of the Unbreakable Vow scene over at snapedom, and her writings on Albus - terri and swythyv's writings about the Birdbath of Doom and Merlin's test, and perhaps jodel's essays at redhen.

In-progress pieces are listed with tentative titles and numerals - the final breakdown will be determined as the posts are written.

Last updated: September 14, 2015.

Indestructible

Introduction and Part I

Part II

Part III

Part IV - Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Intermezzo

Part V - The Wheels of Heaven

Food For Thought (some references that keep occuring to me as I work on all this - not an essay)

Part VI - Dark Marks and Dark Arts

Poll (closed)

Part VII - Miscellaneous Cards I (Flight, Immortality, Love)

Notes for Indestructible - chapters of interest and a patronus tidbit

An Addendum on Flight

Intermezzo II - Etymological Excursus

Eating Death? - a brief note on yew trees and deer

Part VIII - Miscellaneous Cards II (Occlumency, Purity, Tower and Cave) [in progress]

Part IX - Considering Severus Snape [in progress]

Part X - Wolfsbane: Severus' Boggart [in progress]

Part XI - Faithful Servant: Severus and Voldemort [in progress]

Part XII - my two readings of Severus' arc [in progress]
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Indestructible – Part II

”May it be a light to you in dark places, when all other lights go out.”

So says Galadriel of her gift to Frodo, upon the Fellowship's departure from Lorien. (No, I haven't forgotten which book series I'm meant to be writing about. Humor me for a moment.) The beautiful and wise elf queen gives each member of the party a token upon parting, something meant to aid them and remember the fading Lorien to them as they continue their quest. Or rather, in their help to Frodo on his quest. His quest to save them all.

She saved the final gift for the Ring-Bearer himself – surely the most important gift of the lot, if any was. For Frodo bore the greatest burden and faced the greatest tests of them all, in a quest that, in her words, stood even then upon the edge of a knife. And recall that, in extremis at the last moment, Frodo failed.

People forget that. That Frodo failed at the last, most important moment. It was only his own earlier mercy – at a moment when it did not seem so very important as it would later prove to be, to a being that did not even fully comprehend it, much less return it – that ultimately saved him and everyone else. (Tolkien really did see far better what to do with this sort of thing than JKR, whatever the flaws of the book and the man.)

Galadriel herself knew first-hand the power and temptation, and so the burden, of the Ring, having only just recently herself passed the test it posed, when Frodo offered it to her freely. She knew, perhaps better than anyone else possibly could, the nature and gravity of the immense peril Frodo would be facing. Both physical peril and moral, spiritual, peril, and grave indeed – and Frodo, for all his courage and goodness of heart, could not see, could have never seen, the task through with only his own strength. (Bless you, dear Samwise Gamgee.) Yet what was the nature of her gift to him?

Nothing more than a phial of clear water, in which the light of a star had been caught while it played in her fountain.

Read more... )
[identity profile] condwiramurs.livejournal.com
Or, a multi-part meditation on Severus Snape, moral struggle, and love.

All that thinking about terri's Greater Love and the fic I'm writing has prompted me to blather on a bit about how I see Severus as embodying the more complex aspects of moral struggle that work their way into the HP books, despite JKR's refusal to let him openly come into his own on the page. I’ll be posting the parts of this as they get written (that is, in between writing sections of my dissertation, sigh). It’ll be more a sprawling web of related pieces than a single long argument, I think, so I’ll just post whatever feels complete enough at the time. This is an introduction of sorts to the theme, and to my view of Severus. It’s a view heavily inspired by our own terri and mary, as well a few others over on Snapedom and elsewhere.

I suppose my view of Albus is somewhere between terri’s Fool Albus and marionros’ Narcissist Albus, with a large helping of swythyv’s Well-Intentioned Moral Failure Albus. When I’m being generous.

(Hey! I can be as cynical and petty as any potions master too, you know – no claiming perfection of spirit here. XD )

My view of Voldemort… Well, we’ll get to that, in time.

Onward.

* * *

Indestructible – Part I

"You’ve got to hide your love away…” sang the Beatles.

Well. I don’t think they meant it quite this way, but looked at from a certain angle it’s an apt theme song for our dear Professor during the most spiritually trying phase of his struggle, and the war, that we see.

And no, I don’t just mean the surface fact of hiding from Voldemort, even under torture and Legilimency, any memory that might betray that he, in one way or another, loved and loves a girl named Lily. Or even a boy named Harry, or a man named Albus.

That’s the easy part.

Read more... )

Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 03:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios