Patronus Lessons
Nov. 24th, 2011 04:37 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
terri-testing.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
deathtocapslockOn the one hand, the Patronus charm has the reputation of being so difficult that many adults can't master it; on the other, not only does super-speshul Harry do so at thirteen, but so do many of his friends two years later--including not only the incalculable Luna, but the never-top-of-the-class Ron, Seamus, and Ernest. Nor can we ascribe their success to Harry's wonderful teaching, for in DH Arthur Weasley and Dolores Umbridge both use the charm with no problem under stressful conditions. Producing, in both cases, fully corporeal patroni, not merely silver puffs.
In fact, we don't have a single canon instance of someone trying and ultimately failing to master the spell. Why, then, its formidable reputation? And why did Harry have such trouble learning it?
Someone pointed out in the "Marietta's True Crime" discussion below that Harry's teaching the DA to cast the Patronus Charm might have alarmed Marietta about the group's intentions, since the only use she knows for the charm is to repel Dementors--the Ministry's authorized Azkaban guards. (Yes, it can also be used against Lethifolds--but not only are those beasts quite rare, they are tropical. Maybe southeast Asian schools of wizardry would teach it as a matter of course to their older students, but northern European ones? No.)
So I posit that the Patronus Charm is not and has not been part of the Hogwarts general curriculum, and that in Britain the only ones who have generally been taught it are those expected to have a need to deal regularly with Dementors: selected law enforcement personnel. Think about this a moment. Aurors would surely be trained to use the spell (summoning Dementors to take custody of the Dark wizards they catch). So too would prison guards. And quite possibly no one else.
Now, people might apply to become an Auror out of romanticism or adventurousness, a desire to serve or a desire to gain power, and they have to be near the very top of their year (five NEWTS) to get INTO the program. But I imagine that prison guards enjoy about the status in the WW that they do in ours. In which case most of the people applying would be on about the magical level of Stan Shunpike: magical drop outs with at most an OWL or two. If they were qualified for a better job, they'd be off doing it.
And Stan, and those on his level of intelligence and competence, WOULD find the Patronus charm (among many others) nearly impossible to learn.
Then it would follow that so as far as the wizarding public would know, the Patronus charm is easily mastered by those wizards and witches at an Auror-trainee's elite level--and everyone below that level is expected to struggle with it.
Now, of course, the OotP, unlike the general population, uses the Patronus Charm to communicate. If the supposition is correct that the general population has never been taught that charm, then Dumbledore may have divined the secondary use way back when he founded the Order and taught his followers it for that reason. Or, he may have taught his followers the Patronus Charm originally because he always expected that Tom, if once he thought of it, would eventually seduce the Dementors, and so Tom's opponents would eventually need to know how to repulse Dementors on Tom's side. Indeed, Albus could even have come up with the secondary use as communicators as an excuse to teach the charm without revealing his suspicions about Tom's ultimate appeal to the Dementors.
However, Fudge knows even less than we Dumbledore's true motives for teaching the Patronus. To him, the fact that Dumbledore's werewolf protege Lupin had known the charm well enough to teach Harry would have ultimately added to Fudge's suspicions about Dumbledore's followers. What did you say, again, Dumbledore, were your reasons for teaching a werewolf, one of Sirius Black's best friends, to cast a Dementor-repelling charm? Did you, perhaps, teach Black himself the same spell, back in the day?
Finally, let's pause for a moment to reflect on Harry's "best evah" DADA teacher's pedagogical incompetence in the Patronus lessons. Lupin explains the spell briefly to Harry, tells him the incantation (doesn't demonstrate any particular wand movement--are we to understand that with the Dark Arts--oops, I mean, Defense--an incantation and intention substitute for the precise pronunciation and exact wand motion required by such subjects as Charms and Transfigurations?), lets Harry try it once and achieve a puff of vapor--all good so far. Then Lupin looses the Boggart for Harry's second and all subsequent tries.
Excuse me, if I undertook to learn marksmanship, I wouldn't expect to be given ONE shot at a target before I was told to try under battle conditions!
Now, in the Boggart lesson this perhaps couldn't be helped--I don't know of any way to tell whether or not a student is casting Riddikulus properly without seeing its effect on an actual Boggart. But the Patronus charm has a visible effect, and normal pedagogical practice would be to let the child practice under controlled conditions until s/he had mastered the spell itself fully--THEN practice trying to cast it as protection against a Boggart-Dementor.
And we see that in the DA, many of Harry's students were producing a corporeal patronus by the end of what was apparently their first lesson--while poor Harry, trying to cast the spell while sinking into unconsciousness, couldn't master the spell for months.
In fact, we don't have a single canon instance of someone trying and ultimately failing to master the spell. Why, then, its formidable reputation? And why did Harry have such trouble learning it?
Someone pointed out in the "Marietta's True Crime" discussion below that Harry's teaching the DA to cast the Patronus Charm might have alarmed Marietta about the group's intentions, since the only use she knows for the charm is to repel Dementors--the Ministry's authorized Azkaban guards. (Yes, it can also be used against Lethifolds--but not only are those beasts quite rare, they are tropical. Maybe southeast Asian schools of wizardry would teach it as a matter of course to their older students, but northern European ones? No.)
So I posit that the Patronus Charm is not and has not been part of the Hogwarts general curriculum, and that in Britain the only ones who have generally been taught it are those expected to have a need to deal regularly with Dementors: selected law enforcement personnel. Think about this a moment. Aurors would surely be trained to use the spell (summoning Dementors to take custody of the Dark wizards they catch). So too would prison guards. And quite possibly no one else.
Now, people might apply to become an Auror out of romanticism or adventurousness, a desire to serve or a desire to gain power, and they have to be near the very top of their year (five NEWTS) to get INTO the program. But I imagine that prison guards enjoy about the status in the WW that they do in ours. In which case most of the people applying would be on about the magical level of Stan Shunpike: magical drop outs with at most an OWL or two. If they were qualified for a better job, they'd be off doing it.
And Stan, and those on his level of intelligence and competence, WOULD find the Patronus charm (among many others) nearly impossible to learn.
Then it would follow that so as far as the wizarding public would know, the Patronus charm is easily mastered by those wizards and witches at an Auror-trainee's elite level--and everyone below that level is expected to struggle with it.
Now, of course, the OotP, unlike the general population, uses the Patronus Charm to communicate. If the supposition is correct that the general population has never been taught that charm, then Dumbledore may have divined the secondary use way back when he founded the Order and taught his followers it for that reason. Or, he may have taught his followers the Patronus Charm originally because he always expected that Tom, if once he thought of it, would eventually seduce the Dementors, and so Tom's opponents would eventually need to know how to repulse Dementors on Tom's side. Indeed, Albus could even have come up with the secondary use as communicators as an excuse to teach the charm without revealing his suspicions about Tom's ultimate appeal to the Dementors.
However, Fudge knows even less than we Dumbledore's true motives for teaching the Patronus. To him, the fact that Dumbledore's werewolf protege Lupin had known the charm well enough to teach Harry would have ultimately added to Fudge's suspicions about Dumbledore's followers. What did you say, again, Dumbledore, were your reasons for teaching a werewolf, one of Sirius Black's best friends, to cast a Dementor-repelling charm? Did you, perhaps, teach Black himself the same spell, back in the day?
Finally, let's pause for a moment to reflect on Harry's "best evah" DADA teacher's pedagogical incompetence in the Patronus lessons. Lupin explains the spell briefly to Harry, tells him the incantation (doesn't demonstrate any particular wand movement--are we to understand that with the Dark Arts--oops, I mean, Defense--an incantation and intention substitute for the precise pronunciation and exact wand motion required by such subjects as Charms and Transfigurations?), lets Harry try it once and achieve a puff of vapor--all good so far. Then Lupin looses the Boggart for Harry's second and all subsequent tries.
Excuse me, if I undertook to learn marksmanship, I wouldn't expect to be given ONE shot at a target before I was told to try under battle conditions!
Now, in the Boggart lesson this perhaps couldn't be helped--I don't know of any way to tell whether or not a student is casting Riddikulus properly without seeing its effect on an actual Boggart. But the Patronus charm has a visible effect, and normal pedagogical practice would be to let the child practice under controlled conditions until s/he had mastered the spell itself fully--THEN practice trying to cast it as protection against a Boggart-Dementor.
And we see that in the DA, many of Harry's students were producing a corporeal patronus by the end of what was apparently their first lesson--while poor Harry, trying to cast the spell while sinking into unconsciousness, couldn't master the spell for months.
Tags:
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 02:10 am (UTC)In DH, we see how super power and speshul Harry is- his hide was toast if the DA hadn't shown up. The students surpass the master...the Golden Trio couldn't manage a viable Patronus at all, iirc.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 03:19 am (UTC)(doesn't demonstrate any particular wand movement--are we to understand that with the Dark Arts--oops, I mean, Defense--an incantation and intention substitute for the precise pronunciation and exact wand motion required by such subjects as Charms and Transfigurations?)
Levicorpus and Sectumsempra seem to work with any odd wand movement as well.
Prison guards
Date: 2011-11-26 12:31 am (UTC)Who's doing the administrative, clerical, and caretaking functions? Somehow I can't see Dementors carrying trays of gruel and emptying slop buckets.... (The last could be house elves, of course, but not, I think, the first two.)
If there are slots in the door to push through food trays and prisoners are not allowed daily exercise periods, there might be no opportunity for humans to see prisoners except brief glimpses or on special occasions (shower day, inspections).
Also, Sirius, and probably Barty, were highest-security prisoners--high ranking (and previously utterly unsuspected, showing how tricksy they were) followers of You-Know-Who. It's specified that Sirius had two Dementors outside his cell door at all times; likely the other Death Eaters did as well.
If you were a human guard making rounds, would you linger to look into the cells in that block, or would you stay the heck away as much as possible? Especially after they'd all gone quiet--nothing to see here....
Madam Crouch--it's possible, theoretically, that if one dies in Polyjuiced form one doesn't revert. That seems probable, actually, or Barty Sr. should have calculated the risk of someone seeing her corpse before it was disposed of unacceptably high.
However, the other reason he might have felt secure might have been Azkaban procedure. The Dementors always know if someone is dying--they get excited. Therefore, so too would any human prison attendants. So they'd probably have staff ready to check and shroud the corpse as soon as the Dementors leave--they wouldn't even need an MD to certify death, with those Dementors providing (behaviorally) absolutely accurate proof of (and time of) death. As to cause of--starvation, hypothermia, pneumonia, failure to thrive--who cares? It's all death by Dementor, and everyone knows it.
Wand movement--actually, the Patronus charm works with no wand movement at all. As soon as Harry got the incantation right while holding firmly to a happy thought, the silver mist flowed from his wand with no hand movement on his part at all.
Re: Prison guards
Date: 2011-11-26 04:17 am (UTC)In my head canon Azkaban has some kind of anti-elf protection, because otherwise I don't see how one can keep an elf-owner imprisoned without hir cooperation, when elves can Apparate even in places protected against Apparition and take others with them.
House elves on Azkaban
Date: 2011-11-26 07:51 pm (UTC)Re: Prison guards
Date: 2011-11-27 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 03:35 am (UTC)To fly you need happy thoughts and pixie dust. The Movie Hook showedrown up Peter struggling to find his happy thought. That is not really unlike what goes on in HP.
So, I feel like JKR took the Happy Thought idea from Peter Pan.
I never got that it was super difficult from the books or movie, No matter what the hell the other people in the series were saying. It came across to me as, if you practice you will get it.
Also I remember someone questioned JKR about Death Eaters using a patronus. Maybe it was the is Snape the only DE or either someone asked could DE create them. Her answer seemed to suggest DE don't need it because it apparenlty somehow works against there 'dark' side of magic. Sorry I can't remember the exactly question/answer - but It just made me think What the hell are you talking about woman?
Death Eaters don't have Happy thoughts? Or are they like, supposedly so eat up with dark magic that they can't make a patronus? Or...really I don't fricking know and it's another frustrating example of F'ed up magical law in Harry Potter series. I have to ask why the hell wouldn't a DE want to have a cool bad ass patronus?
Why can't they do them considering harry doesn't seem to have any trouble doing curses and negative spells. JKR's answer sort of comes across as, no self respecting death eater would ever think a Patronus was a good idea. Don't cramp my reputation with that flowering puffy white animal crap. That spell is just too good for us bad guys. What would the dementors thing of us...blabla...it just seems lame. And even suggesting they can't do them is idiotic considering she has harry just blataintly doing supposed evil spells - HELL, almost ever other good character is doing evil spells. So why would a DE be stopped from having there own nifty patronus?
Ok JKR, I'll buy it IF I had a reasonable counter dark spell - I mean if there was something on the dark side that was just as relevant then okay. The CounterPatronus...this is our bad ass counter spell to patronus magic...but all the bad guys get thats even close is these dumbass 'dementors' .
I guess thats why she had to throw in this spell is supposed to be so difficult that goodies have trouble doing it. The thing that makes it all look stupid is we don't really see them having a whole lot of trouble.
Oh wait, is Tonks having that LOVE affected Patronus crap supposed to be an example of someone having trouble. Yea, unrequited love apparently screws up your patronus...right.
WTF, Rowling?
Snape was having some seriously screwed up LOVE issues from day one and his patronus is seemily the most powerful patronus out there. Snape's patronus was supposedly so damn powerful that HARRY felt a connection to it. So, WTF again.
And then if we add into that the animagus crap; McGonagall turns into a cat, her patronus is a cat.
So does this mean it's a predictor of what your animagus might be? But we've got a suggestion that people's patronus changes - As in Snape, and Apparently Lily - or I'm really not 100% sure on Lily. Someone asked JKR about the whole deal with James/Lily/Patronus (again don't remember question/answer right now) but the answer sort of implied that your patronus will change to reflect your one true love - so was she suggesting Lily's changed to a doe.
If Lily's changed to a doe to be James perfect mate - then whats the deal with Snape's - shouldn't his patronus have been whatever Lily's was before it became a doe. OR maybe Lily's just never changed and it's another case of rowlings F'ed up interview answers - and Lily/James were always setup from birth with Deer on the brain...so when they first met it was ON and nothing was going to stop that mating train to making a perfect little offspring - now matter how much of a jackass James was.
(And at this point I know I'm rambling the hell out of this message)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 07:16 pm (UTC)Just don't ask me, how in that case Severus knew, that his doe was a Lily-thing.
(Hello, after quite some time lurking, this is my first comment on this great side)
Lily Sue
Date: 2011-11-25 08:02 pm (UTC)In JKR's view she was defined by being James' woman. A doe, since he was a stag.
Re: Lily Sue Doe
Date: 2011-11-25 09:19 pm (UTC)JKR has Harry state it's like Lily's and insist it's like Lily's but there is nowhere in canon that Rowling shows us Lily either casting a patronus or having a doe animagus. It's an assumption that is shoved on us and we're just supposed to accept that Lily had a doe patronus without actual proof other than the love Severus supposedly felt for Lily and that he is able to create one.
JKR never shows us in canon Lily having a doe anything; hell I would have settled for her carrying a toy doe to the playground. JKR really NEEDED to add at least one more section to the Princes Tale, perhaps showing young school age Lily and Severus practicing the patronus charm together - but no, we're just supposed to assume it because Harry insists it is Lily.
Re: Lily Sue
Date: 2011-11-25 09:45 pm (UTC)Which makes it even more hilarious, that we never see Lily Sue use her special girly (swishy AND less powerful than James') wand, ever.
As to not get disgraced, none of the Potter Sue's had a wand handy, when Voldemort came and kicked their door in.
Convenient, that. Instant Martyrdom.
And it makes JRK's 'Lily loved Severus as a friend and might have come to love him romantically' quote even more absurd. As per the author Lily only stopped loving him, because 'he was drawn to loathsome people and acts', if I remember correctly.
And that from the girl that married James Potter. Right.
Re: Lily Sue
From:Re: Lily Sue
From:Re: Lily Sue
From:Re: Lily Sue
From:Re: Lily Sue and choosing James the violent...
From:Re: Lily Sue and choosing James the violent...
From:Re: Lily Sue and choosing James the violent...
From:Wuthering Heights
From:Re: Wuthering Heights
From:Getting into the series
From:Re: Wuthering Heights
From:It's so commercial, it can't be much good
From:Re: It's so commercial, it can't be much good
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 09:12 pm (UTC)Yea, I don't know either how Severus would have a doe; well more like I don't know how Harry in Deathly Hallows felt this kinda connection to it. Well, I don't have the book in front of me but the way it read it makes me think...why does Harry feel connected to Snape's patronus? Just because it's a doe.
I've even played around and posted my thoughts on the whole Magic as a sort of 'god'. Sorry my thoughts don't always flow orderly but if I can stick to my idea without going off track - sort of like the Patronus isn't just proof to everyone else that Snape is good or it isn't even that HE is exactly good (though I digress on the idea that he's total evil) - it's more like when He and Dumbledore are talking and Dumbledore is giving him a hard time suggesting he (Severus) has learned to care for Harry. Snape doesn't argue - he creates the doe patronus as his proof.
It's a bit like for Snape, it doesn't matter what he says - nobody believes him...and really it tends to not matter what he does...again very few people believe or trust him. So, Severus has this option, they will believe magic. The patronus is like 'proof' without words.
SO I've sort of wondered, is it even proof to him? Maybe he doesn't even trust himself where emotions are concerned. He joins a group who want to both kill or don't like muggleborn. Severus has known what Lily was from the start and HE himself is half muggle. So does Severus being able to create that Doe give him a reality jolt - making even him realize his innerself.
In another way (As I mentioned above about the God Magic) I've sort of considered the idea that 'Magic' was playing him - not unlike Dumbledore, magic was using Severus as a tool. So Magic gave Severus a doe patronus, that connected to Dead Lily that makes Harry feel a connection and trust to it. We know Harry would never trust anything Snapish - so why does he feel connection/trust to this suddenly appearing unknown doe patronus.
As far as Hogwarts curriculum goes - I have no clue if it would be taught at Hogwarts. Since The OOTP we have Umbrige who does not seem to be teaching what we might normally expect and she's changing things at the school - it is actually hard to say IF given a better teacher, IF students might have been taught about the patronus. Remus seemily decides to teach Harry for a special reason, because the dementors are more attracted to Harry. So, it's pointed out that he's young for being able to produce a full patronus - but I don't think any of that suggest that it is never taught at Hogwarts. 6th and 7th year classes are suggested to be more select students. I would imagine that in 7th year at least the subject would be touched on.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 11:16 pm (UTC)But I like your idea, that the doe reflects Severus' inner self for more reasons than just the Lily-Love.
Maybe the form of that Patronus even reflects Lily especially for HIM. That would really break my heart...
And it would be even less of an explanation, why Harry and ALBUS see that doe and think it's Lily somehow.
Maybe the WW is just that sexist. It seems to be the knee-jerk reaction that the wife/girlfriend HAS to have a form that means something special to her man?
Some fans even think, Hermione's otter is connected to OTTERY St.Catchpole and there is Tonks...
It's always the females. And Severus, of course.
I don't think, Severus knew the Death Eaters would go that far, at first. Like you said, there was Lily and he was a half-blood himself.
It almost comes off to me, as if he might not have cared all that much about the political side of the whole thing. Just about being cool and getting his own back.
Not the smartest thing anybody ever did, but it doesn't make Severus any more evil than anyone else in those books, IMHO.
Maybe they did indeed teach the Patronus-charm at Hogwarts. The degree of difficulty goes up and down as the plot requires, so it's hard to tell.
I just thought, most wizards would never need that charm.
It's mostly something for Aurors, Prison-guards(If there are human ones. Maybe its only dementors and house-elfs), and Order-members. The last isn't even any official career.
But yes, Umbridge was surprisingly handy with that charm, for such an incompetent bureaucrat.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Moon hare
From:(no subject)
From:Azkaban
From:(no subject)
From:Harry would never trust anything Snapish
Date: 2011-11-26 02:40 am (UTC)So in canon, both times he encounters Snape without knowing who it is (and without Snape trying to alienate him), he trusts him instinctively.
Re: Harry would never trust anything Snapish
From:Re: Harry would never trust anything Snapish
From:Re: Harry would never trust anything Snapish
From:Enslave the Muggles/Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:Re: Enslave the Muggles/Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:Sense of humor
From:Re: Sense of humor
From:Being stubborn about the book
From:Re: Enslave the Muggles/Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:RE: Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:Re: Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:Re: Reaction to Sectumsempra
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 03:01 am (UTC)Thus, my personal theory is that Lily was or would have been a doe animagus. Severus's patronus took the form of a doe because he was loyal to Lily above all others.
Harry didn't know that his father was a stag animagus, but his patronus still took the same form as his father's animagus form. So you don't need to actually know the animagus form of another person in order for your patronus to take on the same form.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:No two the same
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Patronus form
From:Re: Patronus form
From:Re: Patronus form
From:Re: Patronus form
From:Re: Patronus form
From:Re: Patronus form
From:Doe patronus a proof to Sev himself?
From:Interviews, shminterviews
Date: 2011-11-26 02:03 am (UTC)So Harry thinks Severus's patronus must be a doe because Lily's had been--and when has Harry been right about anything else about Severus? As to Albus, he lies like a rug.
I am reasonably sure that the doe probably symbolized Lily to Sev; about all else, I'm an agnostic. (Though Alison Venn--the one who claims to have the same birthday as one of the minor characters in the Severus Snape epic [7/31] wrote a great story, "Sincerest Flattery"? in which Lily is first in Charms class to master the Patronus, and James takes his Animagus and Patronus form and Severus his Patronus, from seeing her Patronus first....)
As in: the doe, in Celtic symbolism, represents grace, gentleness, protectiveness, wisdom, and is a guide to spiritual evolution--the white hind leads the seeker into the faery woods, if he will but abandon material ambition. (In real-life cervids, the doe, not the buck, protects the fawn.) I should imagine that's a fair animal representation of Sev's opinion/idealization of Lily. Sort of like seeing Lily as Beatrice (or Beatrice as Beatrice): we know more about the lover than the love-object, once we know that comparison is being made.
If I remember correctly the RL Beatrice married someone else--didn't stop her being Dante's spiritual inspiration....
I don't think most magical people WOULD find the charm that difficult--at least not under laboratory conditions, without a Dementor breathing down your neck. We don't see most of the DA have problems--in fact they seem to find it easier that Protegus. That it should have a such a reputation suggests to me that most have never tried it, and have HEARD of it as being difficult.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:40 pm (UTC)Harry disagrees with Snape's opinions on how best to counter Dementors. Harry's preferred (and only) method is a Patronus, so there must be some other method (left typically undescribed, because once Harry knows how to do something, other methods of achieving the same thing are clearly inferior).
no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 06:05 pm (UTC)Of course the Doylist reason is Rowling's need to be coy about her surprises - Remus being a werewolf and the form of Harry's Patronus (and what is says about James). So no corporeal Patronus can be described before Harry's.
Hmm. When Remus asked Hermione how she figured him out he proposed as hints the schedule of his 'illnesses' and his Boggart, not his Patronus. Maybe he really doesn't have a corporeal one. Maybe the whole bit about the difficulty of the spell is Remus being defensive.
No corporeal Patronus?
Date: 2011-11-26 01:10 am (UTC)Hmm. This makes Remus the one person we have actual evidence for knowing the spell, trying to use it, and not able to produce more than a silver mist. (Though Hermione is spotty--want to theorize why? Of course, it may just be that it's spotty when actually facing multiple Dementors....)
Remus--weaker than Dolores. I like it.
Of course, there is an easy explanation for Remus's impotence with this spell. Remus also believes you have to think of your happiest memory to cast the spell. I think, myself, that you have to generate and project feelings of joy, hope, will to survive--and that for many (most)people, the easiest and most natural way to do so is to remember, to revisit, intensely, a time you already felt that way. I.e., your happiest memory.
The problem for Remus, then, is the content of his happiest memories. We know what they are; he told us at the end of PoA. "...[the Marauders made] my transformations not only bearable, but the best times of my life."
Problem is, those memories are also inextricably tied up with his greatest guilt, shame, self-loathing, and also loss. He led his friends into becoming Animagi; those excursions with his pack, the "best times of his life" each involved threatening the life, health, and sanity of innocent bystanders; he knew his beloved excursions to be crimes, and to be crimes into which he'd led his friends; they were also betrayals of Dumbledore, to whom he owed so much; and they were capped by those friends finally turning on him ANYWAY, assuming him to be the betrayer, keeping him out of the Fidelius Secret; and one of his own pack became a traitor, the worst of traitors, who gave James and Lily to Voldemort and killed the last remaining pack member....
He can't, as a man, remember the joy of running free as a predator with his first pack without also remembering the guilt of being a criminal betraying his benefactor,friends, and strangers, and without remembering the grief of the pack's utter destruction. Both during PoA and post OotP, the only surviving pack member was the filthy traitor.
How could he disentangle his guilt, grief, and self-loathing from his greatest experience of joy to use those memories to power a corporeal Patronus?
Severus, of course, would face similar issues using memories of Lily to power his Patronus....
Re: No corporeal Patronus?
Date: 2011-11-26 01:15 am (UTC)Re: No corporeal Patronus?
From:Re: No corporeal Patronus?
Date: 2011-11-27 03:02 pm (UTC)And I would really like to know, what Severus' happy memory is. Maybe then I could like Lily a bit better.
As it is, I'm a bit awed, that he actually has memories that good of her. And I'm not sure, if that's devotion or delusion.
Re: No corporeal Patronus?
From:Re: No corporeal Patronus?
From:Re: No corporeal Patronus?
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-25 06:07 pm (UTC)Alternative means to communicate
Date: 2011-11-26 01:35 am (UTC)However, if one of Dumbledore's little silver instruments replicates the Trace on Harry, or goes off whenever the Ministry trace-tracker does, he would know what happened without need of Arabella or any other spy to tell him.
So I don't think we can regard the incident as conclusive. And there's no other evidence for either Arabella or Hagrid having an emergency-contact-system.
(As to the rest of the Order--is it just me, or is an emergency-contact method that requires one to think Happy Thoughts while, perhaps, one's family is being attacked by Death Eaters a trifle flawed?)
Re: Alternative means to communicate
Date: 2011-11-26 05:44 am (UTC)Re: Alternative means to communicate
Date: 2011-11-26 04:58 pm (UTC)How am I going to tell Dumbledore what's happened, I can't Apparate -
Great job of being inclusive, Albus.
Re: Alternative means to communicate
From:Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Keeping Arabella incommunicado
From:Re: Alternative means to communicate
From: