Why no Harry Potter, eh?
May. 27th, 2012 11:01 amSo I looked at ONTD's "Ten of the most Epidemically Overrated Books," and was incensed to find that books like On the Road and The Great Gatsby made the list but the Harry Potter series didn't (though at least the Twilight series did). I mean really, Harry Potter is the epitome of an overrated book series, given that there are people seriously making the point that it's so deep and meaningful and needs to be read in AP English classes. Never mind that it's a children's book series!
Well, these were the people who said that a bunch of authors besides Rowling disliked the idea of fanfiction without bothering to consider WHY they might feel that way (specifically, that Rowling is the only one who's all that fandom savvy because she's modern in a way that the others aren't). Maybe they just think Rowling is their darling author too, and you can't say anything bad about her.
Well, these were the people who said that a bunch of authors besides Rowling disliked the idea of fanfiction without bothering to consider WHY they might feel that way (specifically, that Rowling is the only one who's all that fandom savvy because she's modern in a way that the others aren't). Maybe they just think Rowling is their darling author too, and you can't say anything bad about her.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-01 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-01 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-02 11:39 pm (UTC)Yeah, I bet there are a lot of bitter kids who almost made the team at Hogwarts, and a lot of bitter kids who are involved in equally time-consuming activities offscreen who don't get out of doing homework. And for that matter, a lot of kids bitter that with the entire British wizarding world being Hogwarts alumni, there is still apparently never any kind of fundraising drive to replace the school brooms. Seriously, only one single parent ever donates sporting equipment? They can't get a dozen or so Gryffindor parents to chip in to buy even a couple of nice brooms for their team? For that matter, why can you even donate to a particular team rather than there being an all-House Quidditch fund from which all donations will be distributed equally?
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 12:28 am (UTC)I kind of wonder what the point of dividing the school up into houses is at all. Doesn't it just make the students even more cliquish than they would be anyways? It's hard enough to make friends at that age, even without the artificial separation. Especially since they have classes with people from other houses, so they could probably develop friendships with them otherwise. I can understand splitting up the dorms, but why make them compete against each other like that as well? And if they wanted to keep the competitiveness, why not have multiple Hogwarts campuses so that the students are not constantly antagonizing their rivals? It seems like the house system causes a lot of unnecessary strife.
I know that if I were in Gryffindor that I would probably be wanting to make friends in the non-jock house. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 01:57 am (UTC)Given that you started university around age 14 in medieval times, maybe what was really happening was that Hogwarts was on the cutting edge of the university movement and they were grouping the students into different degree tracks - doctorate in potions, doctorate transfiguration, etc. (Well, given that they apparently took any magical kids, not just already-educated ones, they would have had to teach a fair number of them to read just to start because they would be statistically more likely to be farmers, so it wouldn't be exactly a university. More like a cathedral school with university tacked on for advanced students? Idk. There could have been some outside influence on their academic structure, anyway.) And there was some kind of strife between the houses due to "external deadly foes," so maybe that's what started the bitter rivalry. But they might never have intended for the houses to be quite so competitive (maybe friendly competitions now and then or something, but not so bitter and longstanding).
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 07:27 pm (UTC)That would definitely make sense, but it seems pretty silly to divide them up at age 11, rather that letting them at least first learn enough about the different choices that are available. If I had to pick a career at that age I would have been a princess lawyer veterinarian. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-04 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-04 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-05 06:42 pm (UTC)I wonder whether they used to associate personality traits with different disciplines, maybe based on humoral theory or something? Transfiguration is warm and... well, I suppose it could be moist or dry, depending on what you're transfiguring... therefore you're either choleric or sanguine and thus bad-tempered and courageous, or something. Probably it would require a lot of ridiculous backbends to make it work, but then, that's kind of par for the course for humoral theory anyway.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-05 06:47 pm (UTC)And yes, it's a fantastic story, isn't it? I think what really makes it work is the rather mundane way in which Jackson leads up to it, so that when the reader finally catches on it's absolutely horrifying.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 11:23 pm (UTC)They can't get a dozen or so Gryffindor parents to chip in to buy even a couple of nice brooms for their team?
I guess the problem was that none of the children of rich Gryffs made the team and nobody bothered to donate if their own child wasn't going to benefit?
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 03:33 am (UTC)What no Chess club? We know wizards play chess. Ron could join, but then it would interfere with Harry being the center of his universe.
Snape's mother was the Gobstone champion when she was a student. Is there a competition while Harry was at school? Or was it discontinued?
Or how about study groups? Why is Hermione is a study group? Silly me she has Harry why would she need anyone else?
The problem is if it doesn't involve Harry it doesn't matter.
Another example of JK poor world building. It would be easy to throw in a reference to some other activity. A Quidditch teammate worrying about a schedule conflict with another club. A house mate mentioning that they had to go because x club was meeting. When Umbridge bans groups have other students complaining about their group no longer being able to meet.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 03:39 am (UTC)If Rowling wanted Harry to see everything important, all it would have taken would have been for him to run into the wrong clubroom by mistake, for example. Or Rowling could have derived some humor from doing what I did in one of my stories, where I had the protagonist deliberately seek out a food club he wasn't part of so he could
peek on the cute girlsget new ideas for recipes he could try.no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-04 07:29 pm (UTC)He didn't have the aside about Quidditch, but if they don't give up on Quidditch after rogue Bludgers target particular players, Dementors swarm the field, etc., I think it's fair to say they value Quidditch more and will continue no matter what the obstacles, while they think of drama (and possibly other activities) as jokes which you can just ditch with the excuse that something didn't go smoothly.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-04 10:09 pm (UTC)Pretty much, this. I guess it's pretty clear where their priorities lie.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 03:54 am (UTC)My dad said he liked figures, that's why he took typing in High School. (That would have been in the 50s, when typing was full of girls)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 06:28 pm (UTC)We did have that. In OotP, I think when Harry thanked Angelina for accepting Ron to the team and Angelina said that there was some guy who flew better but who also had charms club and said that if it came to a conflict he preferred charms. The whole thing was treated as a joke. Silly kid with his charms club acting like it's more important than quidditch. Oh well...
no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-03 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-06 02:40 am (UTC)