Building a Better Voldemort
Sep. 8th, 2012 07:38 pmLast December,
charlottehywd asked if there was a list of things that would make Voldemort a more effective villain. I figured there's no better place to compile one!
Some initial ideas to kick things off:
He could have Apparated into the Potters' house right past the anti-Apparition wards which would stop any normal wizard.
He could have actually killed Arthur with Nagini.
He could have arrested one or more Weasleys in DH and released stories about how they were being subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" on suspicion of blood treason in the Daily Prophet to lure Harry out. (Hey, dangling a loved one as bait worked on the kid before, why not give it another shot? It's not like it'll cost Voldemort much even if it doesn't work.)
He could have Imperiused someone close to Harry - Ron, Hermione, Lupin, Molly - making it hard for Harry to know whom to trust.
He could have turned someone close to Harry to his side by other means, either coercion or brilliant manipulation.
He could have unleashed the Inferi instead of leaving them boxed up in the garage.
We could have seen more of the damage the Dementors caused after they went AWOL after the DE breakout from Azkaban.
I'd love to hear more ideas!
Some initial ideas to kick things off:
I'd love to hear more ideas!
no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 02:53 am (UTC)The weird thing is that Tom Riddle did show signs of being a charismatic manipulator with leadership qualities. How is it that JKR can write that, but not after the character gets magical plastic surgery and red contacts?
no subject
Date: 2012-09-10 11:08 am (UTC)Probably because the most realistic parts of HP are those which are alluded to but not fully depicted (cf. Percy/Penelope and Draco/Pansy, which are probably the only really believable romances in the books). So when JKR’s dropping occasional clues about Tom’s earlier career, we can fill in the gaps with plausible information, but when Rowling shows us more detail, it ends up falling apart due to her poor characterisation skills and lack of basic logic.