Building a Better Voldemort

[sunnyskywalker]

Last December, charlottehywd asked if there was a list of things that would make Voldemort a more effective villain. I figured there's no better place to compile one!

Some initial ideas to kick things off:

He could have Apparated into the Potters' house right past the anti-Apparition wards which would stop any normal wizard.

He could have actually killed Arthur with Nagini.

He could have arrested one or more Weasleys in DH and released stories about how they were being subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" on suspicion of blood treason in the Daily Prophet to lure Harry out. (Hey, dangling a loved one as bait worked on the kid before, why not give it another shot? It's not like it'll cost Voldemort much even if it doesn't work.)

He could have Imperiused someone close to Harry - Ron, Hermione, Lupin, Molly - making it hard for Harry to know whom to trust.

He could have turned someone close to Harry to his side by other means, either coercion or brilliant manipulation.

He could have unleashed the Inferi instead of leaving them boxed up in the garage.

We could have seen more of the damage the Dementors caused after they went AWOL after the DE breakout from Azkaban.

I'd love to hear more ideas!

Comments

[madderbrad.livejournal.com]

Ah, I see. And yes, given what you've said, I can discern (now) how truly 'terrifiying' Rowling could have made Voldemort, had she capitalised on this 'seriously scary stuff' he apparently did when he was a child. Good point.

(I think part of my not seeing this point is due to how much of book #6 just didn't 'stick' with me, how ineffectual it was. Making the here-and-now Riddle a 'seriously scary' dark lord would have worked much better than - *yawn* - examining a couple of five-minute sixty-year-old memories.)

I dare say you've thought more about it than Rowling. I guess the whole issue of 'accidental magic' was something that she never explored or tried to integrate into her world, let alone Riddle's propensity for 'deliberate' wandless magic.

[sunnyskywalker]

It was definitely one of her use-and-forget set dressing elements, but it's there, and it really should have mattered. (Along with all eleventy thousand other things we've mentioned here over the years...) The only reason I noticed is probably because I was so desperate for something to cling to in HBP besides the burning question of who is inviting whom to the party and "omg but does s/he like-like me?". Ancient mental video clips which never amount to anything look pretty good by comparison!

[aikaterini.livejournal.com]

Same here. My favorite parts of HBP were Draco and Tom. Draco's subplot was the only thing moving the story forward and Tom's background, as disappointing as it would later be in terms of what JKR had tried to accomplish, was initially interesting and a welcome distraction from the tiresome soap opera of Lavender/Ron/Hermione/Cormac.

[condwiramurs.livejournal.com]

Thirded. Also, I so, so wish we got more of the story from Snape's POV, or at least the unnamed-narrator. After all we got the Spinner's End chapter - she could have broken away from the Harry-POV more often and shown us more of what was happening behind the scenes.... But of course that would have required actual complex plotting ability and giving us more plausible antagonists instead of cardboard, can't have that, can we. Bitter, me?

[madderbrad.livejournal.com]

she could have broken away from the Harry-POV more often and shown us more of what was happening behind the scenes....

... and removed one of the horrible flaws of DH. But this is something that Rowling just seemed incapable of doing. She made a huge sacrifice in the quality and *believability* of her story when she decided to stick with Harry's perspective throughut the bulk of DH. Forced to have the magically powerful dark lord suddenly - unknowingly?! - transmit every secret to his arch enemy, just so we readers stayed in the loop. Who could believe in such colossal stupidity from a supposedly deadly foe? That the dark lord who'd deliberately sent mental visions to Harry one year earlier was suddenly sending them again ... but from his real-life actions ... and unknowingly? Yeah, right. But Rowling went ahead and wrote such dreck anyway. Because she was determined to stick with her 'only through Harry' viewpoint? Or because she would otherwise been forced to work out another way - a realistic way - for her 'hero' to work out what was happening? Through his own efforts? And she wasn't capable of the 'actual complex plotting ability'? I'm not bitter, I'm condemning. :-)

Gah. What a horrible book DH is.

[condwiramurs.livejournal.com]

My mind is *still* trying reflexively to erase the memory of the dreck that was DH. And then something brings it up and I go "oh fuck, yeah, she did actually write that, dammit." And the little glimmers of light like the SE chapter or the bits that worked (at first....) just make it hurt worse.

And WORD on how it made Voldemort become such a brainless caricature. The story's no good if there isn't a proper villain!!

[sunnyskywalker]

It's ridiculous. And completely unnecessary even if she did insist on Voldie-vision, since she could have had Harry actively try to peek into Voldemort's mind somehow. He doesn't know what their connection is, but he knows there is one, so why not give it a shot, right? Especially if he's out of ideas? Or have it at least be the unexpected result of something he did on purpose, not possibly a side-effect of his wand literally acting on its own because Harry is dumber than a stick of wood. It still would have been ridiculous, but slightly less so.

[condwiramurs.livejournal.com]

You know you've REALLY dropped the ball when your protagonist is literally dumber and less effective than a stick of wood.