An alternative origin for Baby Teddy
Mar. 24th, 2013 03:18 pmBecause I was re-reading some old recaps in various places, and it suddenly struck me that there's an awful lot of speculation that if someone screwed up/deliberately skipped the contraceptive potion, that someone must have been Tonks. I've wondered about that possibility myself. It seems primarily based on two factors: (1) Tonks was pursuing Remus in the previous book, and he was reluctant for various and possibly-not-all-stated reasons, and (2) that's how the most reliable Muggle contraceptive method works.
Tonks was indeed pursuing Remus. She pressured him by debating the merits of their relationship in public, thus bringing more peer pressure to bear on his decision. But do we know her well enough to know whether she'd force a baby to participate in this drama? Hard to say, really - I'd be open to arguments either way. And since for the most part she only discusses her relationship issues in private with a very few people as far as we know during that whole year - granted Harry isn't around enough to provide reliable observation on that point, but at least she doesn't ever start telling the kids her woes - it's possible that the scene in the hospital wing was a stress-induced lapse on her part, if you want a more charitable reading.
So point 1 could go either way, and as for point 2, we can't rely on magical contraception being a perfect analogue of ours. Why couldn't they have a Spermus Mortalitus potion? (Or an easily-reversable Vasectomus or Fallopius Tie-us spell, for that matter... And yes these are all bad Latin, but so is JKR's.)
Just because Tonks ended up being happy about the results doesn't mean it was her actions that led to them.
And in canon, who is the person we know to have forgotten to take a very important potion at least once before, consequently endangering others and causing himself trouble as well?
Tonks was indeed pursuing Remus. She pressured him by debating the merits of their relationship in public, thus bringing more peer pressure to bear on his decision. But do we know her well enough to know whether she'd force a baby to participate in this drama? Hard to say, really - I'd be open to arguments either way. And since for the most part she only discusses her relationship issues in private with a very few people as far as we know during that whole year - granted Harry isn't around enough to provide reliable observation on that point, but at least she doesn't ever start telling the kids her woes - it's possible that the scene in the hospital wing was a stress-induced lapse on her part, if you want a more charitable reading.
So point 1 could go either way, and as for point 2, we can't rely on magical contraception being a perfect analogue of ours. Why couldn't they have a Spermus Mortalitus potion? (Or an easily-reversable Vasectomus or Fallopius Tie-us spell, for that matter... And yes these are all bad Latin, but so is JKR's.)
Just because Tonks ended up being happy about the results doesn't mean it was her actions that led to them.
And in canon, who is the person we know to have forgotten to take a very important potion at least once before, consequently endangering others and causing himself trouble as well?
no subject
Date: 2013-03-24 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-24 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 01:07 am (UTC)No no no, this is JKR's world. You know, like our world, only even more screwed up, and with the gender roles more rigid. Oh I bet there *is* a spell or potion for wizards, but can you see them bothering? I can't. *Especially* Lupin. The person passive about next to everything, and incapable to take *once a month* something as vital as wolfsbane.
Ok, I guess it didn't have to be Tonks's "fault" (though I'm very much convinced it was :-)). It could have been an accident, or the spell/potion could have been tempered with by someone else. But afaik magic doesn't usually fail, and I don't see how Tonks's pregnancy by Lupin could be in anyone's interest. Even Molly probably isn't marriage&maternity freak enough! :-)
I guess they might have been acting under the belief that werewolves are sterile, though. Lupin at least seems to be surprised, and says something to that effect. "My kind doesn't usually breed", or something like that.
And anyway, we have no proof that the kid was actually his. I think it was here, at DTCL, where I read the immortal: "No way is Lupin the father. He's such a wimp, he doesn't have the equipment to father children." :-)
no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 01:27 am (UTC)Re Lupin's remark about not breeding, I always thought that meant werewolves chose not to breed because (1) they didn't want to pass on their disease, and (2) they were afraid of killing or maiming their children in their wolf state.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 12:25 am (UTC)(Sorry I forgot it was you! :( Actually this is the only article I read here after an awfully long time.)
Me as well, and I'm sure that's how the remark was inteded, too. But I guess it can be read many ways if one wants to. :-) (I've come up with all sorts of crazy theories over the years. :))
no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 01:44 am (UTC)But hey! More alternatives for all tastes!
- There are potions for both sexes, and they both screwed up, Lupin out of self-sabotaging carelessness and Tonks out of youthfully irresponsible forgetfulness.
- There are potions for both sexes, and Lupin passive-aggressively "forgot" to take his (perhaps as semi- or entirely-conscious resentment for being pressured into marriage, so danger and time off from the career for her, so there!) and Tonks on-some-level-manipulatively "forgot" hers too (you can posit whatever level of unconscious or conscious intent you like).
- Tonks "forgot" hers and sabotaged Lupin's, because we're all like Merope in the end, don't you know.
- Lupin "forgot" his and sabotaged Tonks's, because he was Ever-So-Evil all along (and just never got caught) and this was an unexpected opportunity to take one of the Order's fighters out of the running for a while with the perfect cover. (That darn apothecary shop must have stored them improperly and rendered them ineffective!)
- The apothecary really did store them ineffectively, either because accidents happen, or wizards are incompetent, or a DE had an actual cunning plan and thought sabotaging the WW's birth control would be a nice chaotic monkey wrench in things.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 12:44 am (UTC)But Lupin doesn't want Tonks to like him, he wants to get rid of her. ;) In any case, it would have been easier for him to let *her* take care about contraception, and if there is one character known to consistently choose what's easy.... :-)
Anyway, it's the woman who runs the risk of pregnancy. Would Tonks risk getting pregnant from a random one night stand, or even rape? (after all there's a war going on)
- Tonks "forgot" hers and sabotaged Lupin's, because we're all like Merope in the end, don't you know.
Reminds me of my golddiger!Lily theory. You know, that Harry conceived so promptly was just a way to make sure James's money *will* go her way. :-) Hey, it's not *my* awful sexist prejudice! I'm just trying to think like Rowling. :)
I love the last two! :D Shame DEs and Lupin are too dumb and boring for that.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-28 12:38 am (UTC)I'm sure Tonks wouldn't intentionally put herself at risk, but without a few more years of life history of making and seeing others make mistakes, she just might not have the level of urgency that the situation really warrants. That's when "oops... well, just missing one of the weekly doses by a day won't really make much difference, will it?" accidents happen. A lot depends on what wizarding contraceptive methods are available, though - it would be a lot easier to screw up entirely unintentionally with a daily potion than a monthly spell. And we just don't know. (Though really, they should have easily-reversible magical tube-tying and vasectomies, if they have any brains... which they don't...)
Another thought: could Tonks's metamorphmagery interfere with its effectiveness? If they're really rare as she claims, there might not be enough case history to even know that it is a risk.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-28 02:34 am (UTC)And she told us she aced her field trials for disguiase, as a Metamorphmagus. Everyone else had to rely on Glamours.
Or, um, Polyjuice.
How many witches out there regularly take Polyjuice, or regularly Morph into an entirely different being?
And when they morph back, what's the effect on that once-a-month steriility potion?
I mean, if I morph back into exactly the same physiological state I was in before the last change, that's one thing. As long as I've been Morphed for only an hour or two.
It would throw my monthly dose off by an hour, no big deal.
If I morph back into what I feel to be my standard (my mid-cycle top-of-the-world best), that's quite another..
From the point of view of a monthly, cycle-dependent potion.
I'm rather suspecting that Wolfsbane, too, might suddenly prove ineffective, if used on werewolves throwing their cycles off with Polyjuice, Metamorphmagicery, Animorphmageri, et al.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-29 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 06:24 pm (UTC)That's stuff people would have noticed. I don't mean metamorphomagi or werewolves, just in general. Most muggles DO know that some medicaments can't be combined with each other (with milk, alcohol, ...), and what side-effects they have. And if they don't know, they go and ask an expert. And we know that wizarding world DOES have potions experts, so what's problem again? They were too lazy and irresponsible to really take care of everything in their power.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-25 12:29 pm (UTC)Sure, common sense demand that there must be, but I'm not sure JKR would agree.
In seven books most of everything happens because "destiny / plot says so" so maybe kids are magically conceived or not conceived that way too. And there's no need for potions.
But yes, if there are potions I think it would be perfectly in character for Remus to forget drinking them.
It's not like he can be responsible and take care to drink potions even when it's a matter of life and death. Why would he think more about contraceptive potion then about wolfsbane potion.
Hm, that got me thinking, do we ever hear something about how potions should or shouldn't be mixed?
In our world pretty much all meds come with "don't drink if you are already drinking: ______" instructions.
If potions can mess each other up, then maybe wolfsbane potion in some way canceled or made contraceptive potion less effective?
It's also possible that "standard" WW contraceptive potion was never meant for werewolves.
Who knows how werewolf's body works. Maybe potions that work perfectly for the rest of WW have no or little effect on them.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 12:13 am (UTC)That’s what I was wondering when it came to Merope. Sure, contraception wasn’t widely available or accepted in the Muggle world back then, but what about the wizarding world? Was there such a thing as magical contraception back then and could Merope have used it if she only had the means and knowledge to do so?
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-28 03:08 am (UTC)I would say, good Catholic that I was raised to be, Virgin and Martyr, but Margaret was most emphatically not a virgin (she was a friend of Emma Goldman's---you know, the one who advocating dancing joyously as the best form of rebellion) and she wasn't quite a martyr to the concept of contraception, though her enemies tried their best to make her so.
Still, if contraception wasn't known or accepted in Muggle Britain by Merope's time, it wasn't Margaret's fault.. There were people out there risking prison to get the word out, that there was a choice beyond "telling Jake to sleep on the roof."
What a witch might know, at that time.... I would imagine would depend on her antecedents.
Certainly if there were ways to control fertility magically (and there must be), the WW would be highly motivated to develop such controls. Who would wield the controls, on the other hand......
Only Merope was, as far as we could see, a motherless, auntless, sisterless, cousinless child. And abused by her father and brother.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-29 02:54 am (UTC)Given the general time period and what we know of wizarding population, you could also concoct a dystopian scenario where contraceptive use is heavily regulated by the Ministry to the ends of breeding more magical people...
Merope's lack of a family network to teach her things raises a good point in favor of Merope having used Imperius on Tom rather than a love potion, if we have to choose between the two. Maybe she would have "found it more romantic" to use a love potion, but did Marvolo or Morfin really seem like the types to be brewing them up for her to have learned how? Imperius, on the other hand... Might even be a family knack, actually, for little Tom to find it so easy to "make" animals and people do things wandlessly.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-04 10:10 pm (UTC)In Marvolo Gaunt's household? That's a big 'if'.
Frankly, we've got a lot of unfounded assumptions regarding the Gaunts. Tom (who wouldn't really know one way or the other) strongly implies that they were never at Hogwarts at all, and the general incompetence Merope demonstrates certainly supports that. But then Albus tells us that she "didn't show to advantage" in the company of her father and brother, which would imply that she did at least attend long enough to sit her OWLs, and her academic record was available to him by the time she was sanctimoniously damning her with faint praise and condescending to her obvious inferiority to Harry.
We've no idea how old she was when she lost her mother -- or precisely who her mother was for that matter.
But it's strongly suggested that her father only valued her as potential breeding stock for future Gaunts, so having a child might well have seemed to her the best way to increase her value and status.
Plus, I'm sure she enthusiastically *wanted* Tom Riddle's children.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-06 06:07 am (UTC)How I see it is, birth control (in all aspects of that phrase, not just contraception) was probably technically possible in the WW long before any of the various aspects were amenable to influence, still less anything to like firm control, by us science-based nerds.
And in the WW, such things were probably mostly controlled by whomever controlled everything else.
Which wasn't, any way you cut it, Merope.
But you're right--to whatever extent she could exert control, she'd have wanted to get pregnent, and expected to be valued more on its strength.
I truly hate to place any weight whatsoever on words of Twinkles, but his suppostion here actually fits quite well--if she'd been dosing Tom Sr. with a love potion, and if she thought that bearing a child increased her worth, then she really might have left off dosing Tom once she was pregnant with his wizard-son, assuming that Tom would start valuing the child, and its mother, as he obviously ought to.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 01:47 am (UTC)Let's just ignore the obvious solution for a while... :-)
Do we even know if there's any kind of contraception in WW?
Since the Weasleys aren't the average wizarding family, I guess there really must be. :-) And judging by the Black family tree, for quite a long time.
It's also possible that "standard" WW contraceptive potion was never meant for werewolves.
Yes I think this is very likely, but they're both (supposed to be...) educated adults, they should know. And if they can't be sure, they probably shouldn't take any chances. No matter how I look at it, they always come out as irresponsible idiots.
Although, I don't rember - is anybody else apart from Lupin affraid that the child might be a werewolf? Perhaps lycanthropy isn't a hereditary disease at all, he was just wangsting about nothing and their irresponsibility was no worse that anybody else's. (I personally see a big difference between a "normal" child, and a horribly afflicted child + dangerous dark creature.)
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 02:07 pm (UTC)But I'm not sure that, if she was asked, JKR wouldn't just shrug and say something like "the magic decide when a child will be made" or something just as silly.
Yes I think this is very likely, but they're both (supposed to be...) educated adults, they should know. And if they can't be sure, they probably shouldn't take any chances. No matter how I look at it, they always come out as irresponsible idiots.
Agreed.
But it's not like Lupin would ask anybody about it. And Tonks might have just assumed that Lupin is old and experienced enough to know what kind of potions he should drink.
Although, I don't rember - is anybody else apart from Lupin affraid that the child might be a werewolf? Perhaps lycanthropy isn't a hereditary disease at all, he was just wangsting about nothing and their irresponsibility was no worse that anybody else's. (I personally see a big difference between a "normal" child, and a horribly afflicted child + dangerous dark creature.)
For all we know it's even possible that werewolves are mostly infertile and only because Tonks was metamorphmagus they were able to make baby Teddy.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-26 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-28 12:43 am (UTC)If there is a potion interaction - which since Wolfsbane is relatively new and most werewolves are living off the grid might not have been documented much yet - and if metamorphmagery also interferes with whatever form of contraception Tonks might have been using - which might not even be a known risk if metamorphagi are really rare - that might almost let them off the hook. On the bright side, based on their characters, it's hard to believe at least one of them didn't do something foolish, so we don't have to give them a pass yet!
no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-30 11:39 pm (UTC)Come to think of it, this might explain why several of the families who were actively involved in the first war conceived children during the height of that conflict. They were producing heirs in case they died.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-01 04:59 pm (UTC)I wonder how that conversation would have gone, though (for a non-evil, non-potion-sabotaging version). Post-7 Potters battle: "Well, you did say you wanted children, and the way things are going, maybe we shouldn't wait..." That would have been some tense and interesting conversation.
no subject
Date: 2013-04-10 05:33 pm (UTC)Athough Harry knows that he's very likely going to die, he doesn't like anyone well enough to leave them money. And without a living will, ALL should go to the Dursleys, Harry's closest living relatives. Even if Harry was Teddy's godfather at the time of his death, it wouldn't be enough. After all Harry himself only inherited the Black fortune (such as it was :)) because Sirius named him in his will. Otherwise, he wouldn't get a knut. Since the Dursleys are mere Muggles, and there are no other relatives close enough to claim them, Harry's earthly possessions would probably go under the MoM. Unless Lupin somehow persuaded Harry to make a living will and name Teddy his heir, but I can't see how he could possibly manage this. :)