[identity profile] sweettalkeress.livejournal.com
Lovegood: So, as I was saying, before I was so rudely interrupted, the Deathly Hallows are an old legend that not everyone believes is true—but I’m one of those people who does believe it.

Read Chapter 21 )
sunnyskywalker: Young Beru Lars from Attack of the Clones; text "Sunnyskywalker" (Default)
[personal profile] sunnyskywalker
On [livejournal.com profile] oneandthetruth's last DH chapter commentary, an interesting thread compared the Mirror of Erised to the Resurrection Stone in its seductive (and potentially deadly) powers of showing something/someone you want.

There's another object somewhat like that: the Veil in the Department of Mysteries. There are voices coming from behind the Veil - voices Luna believes to be those of the dead - and Harry feels tempted to walk through it.

Well, okay, Harry is being trained to have a death wish. But maybe that just means he's more susceptible.

The Department of Mysteries is a research facility. One which we know has produced tangible items now available for (restricted) public use, such as Time-Turners. (Whether they invented them or improved on an existing idea, we don't know.) I seriously doubt they've only produced one artifact ever. So what else might they have made?

They also have the locked room full of either love or Amortensia, depending whom you ask. The Mirror's ability to reflect your heart's desire is suggestively similar to the potion's ability to reflect the scent of what you desire.

A big glass mirror sounds like a relatively recent invention (unless you posit a long history of magical glassmaking, but wizards seem to adapt Muggle technology more often than the other way around). I propose that the Mirror of Erised is a product of the Department of Mysteries, combining attributes of Amortensia and the Veil which the DoM was able to partially replicate/adapt after long study.

Next question: are the Stone and the Veil related? Maybe Mr. Death, whoever he was, created both, and the DoM only got ahold of one of them. Whether this makes the Veil a fourth Hallow, left out of Beedle's version for numerical reasons, is not clear. Possibly it's a super-Hallow, and you can be Master of DeathTM with it alone? Or it's a death-related magical... thing... which shares some properties with the Hallows, but it isn't the same class of artifact and mastery isn't an issue in its case.

Or maybe the Veil is more ancient and the Stone is a portable adaptation created centuries ago by the DoM's first head researcher, Johannus Mors, along with a couple of other powerful items which also escaped the premises and have not been replicated. (And Death took the second lab assistant for his own...)

Thoughts? Fanfic links?
[personal profile] oryx_leucoryx
We left Albus wondering why Tom was doing so little to advance his powers.

Sometime around 1970 something changed. Something caused people like Minerva and Hagrid to fear mentioning the name 'Lord Voldemort'. Something caused Molly and some friends of hers to elope. At the same time, mainstream pureblood wizards still thought this Lord Voldemort guy had the right ideas about who should be running things in wizarding society. Though at this point Tom was no longer making public appearances, or if he was they were rather brief - because he had become a fugitive from the law ('a wizard who has eluded capture for almost three decades' said fudge in 1996). We do not know what he was accused of. As the case of Morfin Gaunt shows, the original charge may have been something minor (like giving a Muggle hives), but refusing to show up to a hearing is an arrestable offense.

So what happened in 1970? Read more... )
[identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com

“What was the temptation, the one that worked?” Margaret Atwood, “Marrying the Hangman”


In my essay “Death Unhallowed: The Suicide Stone,” I suggested that Albus put on Tom’s Horcrux-ring and invoked its curse because he’d been directed to do so by what appeared to him to be the spirits of the dead. But that raises as many questions as it answers, really. Severus implied that the lethal curse on the ring was utterly obvious: “It carries a curse, surely you realized that?” …

Dumbledore grimaced. “I… was a fool. Sorely tempted…”

“Tempted by what?”

Dumbledore did not answer. (DH 33)


Let’s explore this temptation a little further.

Because )
[identity profile] terri-testing.livejournal.com
Back in my essay “The Keeper of the Keys,” I argued that Dumbledore didn’t start hunting Riddle’s Horcruxes until about 1995 because it took him until after Harry’s report of Tom’s boasts in the graveyard to realize that Tom had more Horcruxes than just Harry.

But there’s an even more fundamental problem. Why wasn’t Dumbledore hunting for Tom’s (presumably singular) Horcrux in, say, 1948? Or at least, after Tom’s return from the continent as “Lord Voldemort,” master of the Death Eaters?

I )
[identity profile] chocedric.livejournal.com

Hello all,

I just had someone review a fanfic I am writing, and one of their comments prompted me to pose this question on the journal here. I would really appreciate your opinions!

My fic is a rewrite of GoF through DH. The Priori Incantatem scene in the graveyard is included, and I portrayed Lily and James a little differently than in canon. In my fic, I had them tell Harry they loved him.

When I read GoF for the first time back in 2000, I was only 14. Even then, I wondered why they didn't tell him that. These were the two people who lay down their lives for him because they loved him so much. But yet, after not seeing him for so many years, there was not even a simple "we love you, Harry," said by either of them. I do understand that Harry was in a situation where he needed to get out super fast, but it would have literally taken all of two seconds to have either Lily or James say that. I understand why JKR didn't have Cedric tell Harry messages to send back to his loved ones, because the two boys weren't at all close in canon. I think his simple "take my body back to my parents" was sufficient enough for him. But Lily and James? That was the one thing I didn't like about that scene. At least in the movie, Lily calls him "sweetheart," as he's about to break the connection, and I admit I got a little choked up over that. But I was expecting an "I love you" from Lily or James in the book.

Of course, we did have the forest scene where Harry was walking to his death, when they told him how proud they were of him. But I really did wish for something more in GoF.

What do you guys think?

 


 


Profile

deathtocapslock: (Default)
death to capslock

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2026 01:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios