Head Boy an' Girl
May. 19th, 2011 02:39 pmNow, yer mum an’ dad were as good a witch an’ wizard as I ever knew. Head boy an’ girl at Hogwarts in their day!--PS chapt. 4 Many of us have questioned how James (and, to a lesser extent, Lily) could have been head boy, given everything we've been told about his behavior as a teenager. But I'm wondering... are we absolutely certain that he actually was head boy?
It occurred to me this morning that the only mention of James and Lily as having been head boy and girl in the entire series is Hagrid's statement above, which he makes soon after delivering Harry his Hogwarts letter. We are told multiple times in multiple books that Tom, Bill, and Percy were all head boys, but it is never once stated again that James and Lily were head boy and girl, not even when the trio is looking through an old list of head boys in chapter 13 of CoS.
We know that Hagrid is not the most reliable source of information. Just a few hours later, he will tell Harry, "There’s not a single witch or wizard who went bad who wasn’t in Slytherin," completely glossing over the fact that man who betrayed Harry's family was a Gryffindor. When he declares that James and Lily were head boy and girl, he is in the midst of countering Petunia's claims that they were strange and abnormal freaks who got themselves blown up. Could he be lying here... or, umm, exaggerating the truth a bit? (They weren't really head boy and girl, but they should've been, given how totally awesome they were).
After all, it is Hagrid's assigned duty to make sure that Harry agrees to go to Hogwarts and follows in his parents' footsteps... including, eventually, the whole getting themselves blown up part.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 02:36 am (UTC)But Hagrid didn't know that at the time.
----------------------------------
Oh but he did -- remember everyone thought Sirius Black, a Gryffindor, was the traitor.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 02:45 am (UTC)Well, maybe Hagrid was as stupid as me and forgot that Sirius was a Gryddindor, then? :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 04:19 am (UTC)Sirius was one supposed Death Eater out of tens or hundreds. Making a mistake and saying that Sirius was (also) a Slytherin is a case of incorrectly attributing the House of one Death Eater out of many. If there were a hundred Death Eaters then Hagrid's error rate, the 'gravity' of his mistake in this case, was something like one percent. A mistake that's easy to make. Almost negligible, we get the idea, practically all the bad guys are Slytherins.
But the James/Lily thing - that's specific. It's a fact that's tailored to those two and no-one else. Impossible to get wrong unless you're really really stupid.
In terms of (a) the probability of making the mistake and (b) the 'incorrectness' of the mistake I think the thing with Sirius is much more condonable, acceptable, understandable and possible than the one about James and Lily being Head students.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 04:39 am (UTC)Hagrid might very well believe that Sirius was mis-sorted and should have been a Slytherin, but he would have to be very very stupid to have truly forgotten that Sirius was a Gryffindor.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 06:30 am (UTC)Sure, but the question wasn't about Sirius; it was a much more general, paint-them-all-with-the-same-brush comment about Slytherins. With a hundred (or 60 :-)) of them around, all in Slytherin, it would be entirely understandable and very easy for Hagrid to make that mistake. "Slytherin? Bad house, that Slytherin". He just forgot about that very rare exception, Sirius Black. He was concentrating on Slytherin House.
But if Hagrid had been asked a different question - had his memory jogged - what do you think of Sirius Black? Why, I'm sure he would have said that Black was a bad 'un (despite being a Gryffindor).
Likewise, when he's focusing specifically on James and Lily, he tells us that they were Head Boy and Girl. No doubt about that. Thanks, Hagrid!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 06:34 am (UTC)So that's why I was careful to say 'if'. IF there were a hundred.
Now that I'm completely exonerated from any "oh, maths!" accusation ... :-) ... what couldn't there be a hundred? Yes, I agree that there's nothing in the canon suggesting such large numbers. But is there anything that precludes it either? Is a large part of your proof dependent on ALL of Riddle's minions Apparating to him after his re-embodiment at the end of GoF? (Couldn't he have gone on a recruiting drive afterwards? In fact - wouldn't he?)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 01:49 am (UTC)That's because we actually see her for more than five minutes!!
Plus she's not the complete idiot whom Riddle turns out to be in the final book.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:53 am (UTC)Oh yeah.
I'm always entertained by those fans who protest that their 'Jo' didn't make any errors at all in lining up Harry and Voldemort for the big finale, because, after all, everyone KNEW that it had to finish that way. Who cares about whether the author actually orchestrated that final meeting in a fashion that made sense?
It's one of the "we'll give poor Jo a free pass" excuses that makes me slightly nauseous to this day.
Almost makes you feel sorry for him- the main villain is supposed to have a cool and memorable exit, right?
Yeah. Instead it was the opposite:
Harry: Look, I'm telling you, the Elder Wand has picked ME as its master!
Harry: If you try and curse me you'll die!
Voldemort: *curses Harry*
Voldemort: *dies*
Worst. Villain. EVER.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 03:05 am (UTC)And if IIRC, it was made even worse by the fact that everybody else was just standing around and watching the two of them go at it. War, what war? This is more like a high school brawl.
It's one of the "we'll give poor Jo a free pass" excuses that makes me slightly nauseous to this day.
Especially since it seems to me that most other authors don't get this kind of free pass, and because she has gotten enough free passes for a years' worth of trips to Disney World. Admittedly, I gave her quite a few myself though before I came to my senses.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 03:07 am (UTC)For some reason this scenario makes me think of the old elementary school taunt: I'm rubber and you're glue... This is probably not the right kind of feeling for the climax of a series.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 12:20 am (UTC)Now go back to the graveyard - subtract 10 Azkaban prisoners and 2 known recruits, subtract Severus who wasn't there, but add Gibbons who died in HBP - we are at under 40 standing in the circle. There are gaps for the missing and dead, but Harry can tell the difference between a gap for one person and a gap for two, so at least some of them are standing next to each other. Play with those arrangements.
If there was major recruitment in the second war it was after the Ministry fell - I suppose some people jumped on the bandwagon or wanted to ensure the safety of their families.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 01:48 am (UTC)True. But you then proceed to discuss the number of DEs in Harry's era. So, was there anything limiting or addressing the numbers back in the 'first' Voldemort 'war'?
Tom only managed to get about 35-45 people for the 7P battle ... Lucius who must have stayed home ...
Couldn't other DEs have stayed home? It's not as if we're told that Riddle was ordering every single DE to Privet Drive, right? It's just your assumption that most of the minions were assembled that night?
... we are at under 40 standing in the circle.
How do you know that? I've just skimmed through the graveyard chapters and couldn't seen anything that clearly gave an upper limit. A space for six missing DEs, a gap for two, etc, but no upper bound.
Later on we have this:
"And the Death Eaters? They returned?"
I don't know if forty is 'loads'. Certainly 'loads' would support a higher figure."Yes," said Harry. "Loads of them . . ."
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 01:59 am (UTC)If Tom was desperate enough to rely on Stan Shunpike then any able-bodied and wanded DE was there.
How do you know that?
Based on the number at the time of the 7P battle, adding and subtracting as I explained.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:17 am (UTC)Okay, so all based on the numbers of the 7P battle ... and your assumption that every DE was there.
If Tom was desperate enough to rely on Stan Shunpike then any able-bodied and wanded DE was there.
That's a wobbly inference that falls far short of what would be required for a rigorous proof. For example, if Stan was Imperiused - do we know for sure if he was or not? - then it would have the calibre of the wizard who was controlling Stan which determined how useful he was in the battle. Secondly, maybe Stan volunteered, eager to prove himself. Third, maybe Voldemort ordered a certain number of DEs to attend, first priority given to any DE who had had *any* experience or interaction with Harry Potter.
(I'm forgetting if the 'seven Potters' thing was known to the Voldemort beforehand, but even if not it would have been a reasonable criterion in deciding who would attend.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 09:03 pm (UTC)Tom wasn't expecting more than one Harry, but he didn't know how he would be moved. He had to prepare for a move by air or by land, so he had to have enough people around outside of what he believed to be the boundary of the protected area blocking all possible routes. Ideally he'd want a human chain around the block in case Harry might try walking by in his invisibility cloak. He didn't have enough people even for that.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:05 am (UTC)“Expelliarmus”… and what use would it be to deprive Voldemort of his wand, even if he could, when he was surrounded by Death Eaters, outnumbered by at least thirty to one?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:18 am (UTC)So, yeah, as a priority, disarming the wizard who's trying to kill you there and then makes a lot of sense!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-21 02:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: